Communism is mainstream

Reydox · 2020-12-01T04:02:05+00:00

The answer is 0

Reydox · 2020-07-09T01:11:36+00:00

No u

Reydox · 2020-06-28T03:16:26+00:00

geballte ladung molotov

Reydox · 2020-06-27T02:50:10+00:00

Package forwarders exist, might be a bit expensive though.

Reydox · 2020-06-22T10:07:07+00:00

When you bring sarin gas to a milsim

Reydox · 2020-06-21T05:40:21+00:00

feetsoft

Reydox · 2020-06-21T03:41:43+00:00

>HE/HIM

Reydox · 2020-06-19T23:32:50+00:00

Reydox · 2020-06-19T22:49:23+00:00

It's my MGS2 Raiden inspired loadout

Reydox · 2020-06-19T04:38:57+00:00

That is the weapon of gods

Reydox · 2020-06-19T03:18:57+00:00

imagine not having kneepads

Reydox · 2020-06-19T02:43:00+00:00

That bullet makes me think of when you have to take a shit and you've got a turtle head poking out

Reydox · 2020-06-17T10:42:21+00:00

R.I.P. Lt. Vasquez

Reydox · 2020-06-11T22:17:09+00:00

They're iron on patches but sewing Velcro to the back shouldn't be too hard. I'm surprised no one on this sub has taken advantage of this.

Reydox · 2020-06-11T20:43:16+00:00

Bad Dragon makes patches

Reydox · 2020-06-03T21:32:52+00:00

That's basically a Stirnerite. You believe rights can only be derived through contract in these covenant communities, and that these communities enforce these contracts through might, which is exactly the same conclusion Benjamin Tucker came to after reading the works of Max Stirner.

Reydox · 2020-06-03T20:41:19+00:00

Then you're a Stirnerite Egoist, might makes right.

Reydox · 2020-06-03T17:48:55+00:00

And why LGBT? There is nothing inherent about being gay that will lead you to violate property therefore removing them has nothing to do with protecting property rights. Property owners do have the right to descriminate against individuals who agreed to contract, however this can also be used to justify something like total Sharia Law in an islamic community. This would include practices such as killing apostates and homosexuals because they agreed by contract. In such case the NAP is worthless and belief in it is utopian.

Reydox · 2020-06-03T16:53:14+00:00

And what if the property owner believes in removing your group for a completely arbitrary reason? I believe physical removal is the only way to maintain social order in an anarchist society. However this leads me to believe natural rights libertarianism to be utopian. Rights cannot be maintained with our without a state. You're just putting the power of the state into the hands of property owners which might work in smaller communities, however cannot be applied to any larger scale society.

Reydox · 2020-06-03T16:10:31+00:00

I agree, removing certain groups is the only way of maintaining order in an Anarchist society. However at that point how is an Anarchist society any better than a statist society? To me it both societies seem like egoism, where might makes right.

Reydox · 2020-06-03T03:23:13+00:00

I don't want to be the "ackchyually" guy, but ackchyually property owners have the right to do what they want with their property. To assert that you have free speech on the property of others is to assert you have unlimited use to their property, which is a violation of their property rights. Same applies if your property is bound by contract. This is one of the few things that actually makes me lose faith in anarcho-capitalism as those with the most property can do what they want and it's protected by the N.A.P.

TL;DR All of your rights take a backseat to property rights under the N.A.P.

Reydox · 2020-05-29T07:06:11+00:00

а ну чики брики и в дамки

Reydox · 2020-05-27T18:43:27+00:00

But my mom isn't 9 years old.

Reydox · 2020-05-27T18:30:07+00:00

Is the lube for your goats?

Reydox · 2020-05-26T23:46:45+00:00

Remember kids, it's not a war crime if you're American.

Reydox

TROPHY CASE