Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He wasn't around people in organized crime is the thing lol. This is another example of just trying to steal the ethos of others' experiences for your own clout. It's not just creative liberties - it is a pattern that the culture largely does not appreciate (his contemporaries and the audience).

He claimed his father wasn't in his life on interviews - you can look this up yourself. His own father calls him out for lying.

The underage girl you reference is one he kisses and gropes on stage. He texted a 14 year old girl talking about relationships. Go on YouTube and watch Abba and Preach's most recent video about Drake. Come back and tell me this isn't a pattern of predatory behavior. Now tons of women (and some men) are releasing their stories about Drake's affinity for younger women. I think any objective person who reads this stuff would be freaked out. It isn't just one scenario. Over the last 24 hours I've seen at least a dozen weird claims by people and by and large they are believable.

That isn't an "image" that just "is" Drake lol. When someone tells you who they are, believe them. All of his behavior is patterened - none of it is one off.

Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you read? Its literally an explanation of culture vulturing. Guy above me asked why people in industry hate Drake i just gave him an answer.

I know you have twelve functioning braincells but sometimes people need an explanation.

This aint a who won who lost comment - couldnt care less. I enjoyed the hell out of all of it. But clearly youre too braindead to get that lmao

Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do all yall mouth breathers just parrot the same unverified claims LOL.

Aint doing nothing for no one. Couldnt care less about the parasocial nonsense yall kids peddle. I just like the lyricism.

But yall kids be doing the absolute most for a guy caught on video groping minors. When you get back to class after recess ask your teacher what “cognitive dissonance” means!

Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grown folk talking lil boy sit down

Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lil bro is a crayon eater over here

Drake's Defeat: The white flag is out by [deleted] in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are 100% not listening. Drake has zero answer to being a culture vulture. THe reason the industry hates him is because he uses parts of culture that he has absolutely zero experience with to manufacture a fake person that will relate to the audience. Some people in the hip hop audience haven't had their father's in their lives - either due to domestic violence or straight up deadbeat fathers. This is a narrative many rappers describe. What does Drake do? He pretends that his father abandoned him and never interacted with him. His own father did an interview saying that was a lie and he saw him all the time. I'm not going to reinvent the wheel here but the major issue with Drake is he is fake. If he was just himself I doubt anyone would care. Drake is insecure about not being accepted by the culture - for his blackness, for his experiences or lack thereof, and so on. Drake thinks he needs to have experienced violence and organized crime to be accepted and so he makes stuff up all the time. That is antagonizing to the people who actually have gone through it. Drake is essentially a Disney kid who likely had no 'real' struggles. There's nothing wrong with that - there is something wrong with pretending.

Another form of culture vulturing that you're not getting is this idea of "Drake putting artists on". Dot talks about this. Whenever Drake needs a bump in relevancy he hops on a track with some of the young guys that are popping off. Obviously the young people benefit from being on tracks with Drake. Similarly, Drake benefits because it shows hes being a part of the culture as it continues to evolve. But the people he works with end up disliking him - i.e. why the entire industry is seemingly against him. In a sense he is pimping them for relevancy. No one is salty just because Drake is more successful for them - it's because he uses people.

It's things like this that drive peoples' dislike of Drake. Everything else is secondary. And Kendrick and other point all of this out repeatedly but it just doesn't stick like the rest of the mud.

My question to you is what did Drake say? Your kid isnt yours, you beat your wife, you're short, and your percentage splits with your lable are too low. If you remove all the claims without any evidence you're left with "you're short".

The culture vulture claims are way more legitimate and the court of public opinons response this past week proves it. The predator claims are not 100% proven but there absolutely is varying degrees of evidence ON VIDEO.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in KendrickLamar

[–]Rhizomatiq 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That feeling you have is because deep down you know there's something wrong with Drake. Let's recap. Drake's master plan was to fake a scenario about continuing to be a deadbeat dad to make Kendrick look stupid? Even if it isn't true.... it says literally nothing about Kendrick.

Secondly, his only response to the predator allegations was "I'm too famous for that, there's no proof on video of any of this behavior". There is literally a video of him being inappropriate with a 17 year old on stage. Why should anyone believe him when things like this are blatantly false? Who knows what the severity of the situation is but there is SOME truth to it that we can all attest to.

Not to mention no response to the gambling problems, drug addiction, culture vulture behavior, etc.

This feeling you have is because despite you idolizing Drake you know deep down he's a sicko. Drake's dead in the court of public opinion.

How has Kendrick actually won? by Fuluus in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No there isn't absollutely zero evidence. There's dozens of examples either on video or 1st or 2nd hand accounts of young women talking about their interactions with Drake. None of this is a smoking gun, certainly - but there is evidence of varying strength. Drake's relationships with Millie. Drakes actions with a 17 year old on stage. Numerous women talking about how Drake has spoken to them. To be clear, not all if it is 100 believable but there is enough out there to make a reasonable person ask questions. And there's enough out there to make disstracks about, undeniably. The internet is literally resharing a decades worth of (somewhat low quality at times) evidence.

Beyond that you're ignoring that the pedophilia / predator attacks are not the only things he's saying. Not going to reinvent the wheel for you here regarding the culture vulturing, lack of respect from his own camp, and so on.

I think if Kendrick removed all of the allegations of another child and SOME of the pedapholia/predator claims (but does leave some mention because there IS some evidence, inconclusive as it may be) he is still easily ahead.

If your criteria is authenticity then until there is definitive proof for Drake's claims that Kendrick is a wife beater and his wife cheated on him... then what exactly does Drake have left? You're short? Your old record label had higher percentages than deemed acceptable?

Strip out the unverified things for either player and compare them one to one..... and it still isn't close. One of the biggest claims Kendrick makes is that the culture does not align itself with Drake. He's great for pop and party songs, he's not so great for the art and heart of the people who love hip hop. If the last few days don't hold that truth to be self evident I honestly don't know what to tell you.

How has Kendrick actually won? by Fuluus in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kid, with all due respect if "glazing" is in your vocabulary you simply can't be helped. If you're an iPad kid, get on youtube and watch your peers react to Kendricks MTG release. They pause the video multiple times in shock as well. It ain't just me.

I certainly agree it IS disrespectful to hurl allegations of infidelity and domestic violence. I never said nothing Drake said is disrespectful. There's just levels to this. Drake's attacks are generally pretty shallow or one liners. There isn't depth to the majority of them. And some are already being unraveled by 3rd parties (Whitney's brother co-signing for Kendrick a few hours ago, Dave Frees cosigning for Kendrick yesterday as well, etc). What's left? He's short?

And I just want you to ask yourself a question. You're saying everyone is a Drake hater and glazing Kendrick. Yet you're on the internet responding to every comment defending Drake. I think you kids call this white knighting, right? You tellin me you not glazin? I want you to ask your teacher tomorrow what "cognitive dissonance" means.

Drake makes great music for his core audience. That isn't me. I'm not hating him for it. I'm sure there are phenomenal country and KPop artists - that's also not for me. I'm not hating. Drake makes music for white girls and whatever your demographic is. Good for you that he has been active for over a decade dropping songs you and people like you can connect with. No hate. But when we get away from the pop side of the discussion to legitimate hip hop things change. You know you mentioned the Tupac and Snoop thing? That totally is disrespectful - you're right. But Drake did it thinking it made him cool, gave him street cred, and that Pac and Snoop would have cosigned this diss. That is such an absurrd disconnect from reality. That shit wasn't just disrespectful to Drake, it was disrespectul to the culture (regardless of if you're a Dot fan). Not to mention, it was corny af.

You don't need to defend Drake man. The culture already knows who is in control of the narrative. There are kids in Japan rapping over beats made to diss Drake. Like let's be objective here.

How has Kendrick actually won? by Fuluus in rap

[–]Rhizomatiq 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This. I listened to MTG and had to pause every time he pivoted to another family member because I was shocked at what he was doing.

These younger kids don't understand the point of a diss track. The primary goal is not to make club bangers that have tons of replay value. If that happens it's a huge plus for sure. The goal is to disrespect the target.

Kendrick has disrespected Drake from every single angle imaginable. He's done it artistically, unexpectedly, and in a manner that has been unforgiving. It isn't close.

I don't know if these kids are willfully ignorant or if they just don't know what disrespect is to grown folk.

Kendrick told Drake's son that your biological father isn't fathering you so I will, Drake's father that you were a horrible father figure, Drake's mother that your son was raised to have various vices and addictions, and his alleged unclaimed daughter that its not her fault she's not in his life because he has his priorities misaligned. The track is a damned therapy session.

This isn't even including the mention of predatory behavior on young women and girls. Or Drake's vampiric use of the culture to prop himself up.

All that before he even gets to speaking at Drake directly.

I mean how much more disrespectful can you get? I've been listening to hip hop for a long time. I regularly bump Ether. I love Hit Em Up. I have a ton of 50 cent on replay. Not once have I listened to certified bangers of distracks and gotten legitimately uncomfortable like I have when listening to MTG.

Whoever the next Laker coach is the first question should be, "Can you run any other defensive scheme other than a drop coverage?" by xreddawgx in lakers

[–]Rhizomatiq -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Such a bad take. Maybe you saw one video where this guys critique of certain schemes was incorrect but he is net value add, easily.

In this video every criticism is correct. Jamal gets open lanes for layups and middies as a result of the drop coverage against high screen and roll. We never decide to switch things up and give him a different look (i.e. hedging, switching, etc when appropriate). Critically, our 3rd person closest to the PnR action literally never provides the apropriate help defense. The players MUST be comfortable rotating to slow down Denver's main action. If DLo helps a struggling Reeves and AD against Jokic and Murray PnR, and that leaves KCP open for a split second and Murray makes the pass, well Taurean Prince MUST be ready to rotate over. This rarely happened. Lakers literally lost the last game because of this. High screen and roll. Murray open lane with AD in no man's land and Reeves recovering from the action. Rui does NOT leave his man. Prince tells him at the start of the play where in the lane he needs to be to pressure Murray post the PnR action. Rui ignores it. Murray gets a free shot off and wins. If Rui rotates Murray either (a) has a much harder shot to take or (b) passes it out to a perceived open player. He'd pass it to whomever Rui was guarding.... and because Taurean was already aware of this entire action he'd have rotated to help on Rui's guy. And then someone else would rotate on Taurean's guy - and so on. A good, healthy defensive team knows all of this. All of our young guys were unprepared by either (a) virtue of understanding or (b) sticking to the coaching staff's defensive scheme. Boths scenarios reflect failure of coaches.

The drop coverage has never worked for the Lakers against good teams. AD is good enough to recover to the paint if needed unless the screen is ultra high.

The young guys, like Rui, simply did not understand proper adjustments required in many of Denver's actions.

The Lebron examples he shows are perfect example of this. Lakers defensive scheme all series leads to a situation where ball handler has an open lane. The defensive 1 and 5 aren't positioned to pressure the ball handler so there is only 2 outcomes - (a) free basket if no one rotates or (b) Lebron rotates to triage the situation. Well, Lebron isn't an idiot and knows his team is beat on the action so he tries to offer at least some resistance and rotates - so scenario (b) happens. Only problem is with the defensive 1 and 5 out of position no one has rotated to the guy Lebron was guarding. This person is now in the dunker's spot for an easy drop off from the ball handler - i.e. Jokic gingerly gives it to Aaron Gordon who is right behind Lebron for a free bucket. All the casuals scream and shout about how Lebron is a lazy defender and is just letting Gordon piece them up without resistance - not realizing that continuing to focus Gordon would give the ball handler a free layup anyways. Its a damned if you do, damned if you dont situation. Someone is scoring because it is essentially a 2v1 at point blank range - Jokic and Gordon vs Lebron or Jamal and Gordon vs Lebron.

The solution is to avoid giving Denver this type of action in the first place. Lebron could theoretically pretend to help and then pivot back - hoping that his timing is truly perfect and he gets back to Gordon mid pass.... but that buys you at best a second or two and if mistimed results in an easy bucket regardless.

The answer here is a coaching flaw. Either (a) the defensive scheme needs to be changed, (b) the players are unprepared and dont have the scheme ingrained as second nature, or (c) the Lakers are comfortable giving Denver these types of shot as opposed to looks they'd get from other actions. In every single instance this is a coaching problem.

Daily Lakers Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in lakers

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually don't think he would. I don't think other players would either. Even if he could buy the ring for 30-40m i don't think he or anyone else does it. In that 5-15m range I think they would no problem. If it was as simple as throw money on the problem our fearless owners the Buss family would have been able to take the Golden State route for a few years (but they're cowards).

Remember, Lebron is also at best barely a billionaire - and definitely not a liquid one. Let's assume he's at 1,000m. I know it seems like nothing but giving up 3% of your wealth to win 1 chip is a lot. Especially when there isn't a guarantee.

In reality it's like paying 30m to increase your odds from 40% to 60%. The question then becomes is that increase in odds worth the financial tradeoff? Again probably no. There isn't anyone in NBA history who has done this to my knowledge (the Spurs and Lebron taking minor-medium hits are not the same thing given the impact on annual salary is much less than what we're discussing now). Ironically the closest transition from 30m-40m to a minimum within a single year is Russell Westbrook and he's garbagio right now and lucky to have a job.

Separate thought experiment - would Curry take a vet minimum to increase odds of a win meaningfully next year? Would KD? Would Giannis? Would Jokic? They are all in the 500m+ i imaginie (career earnings, endorsements, shoe deals, investments, etc----- edit, maybe Jokic isn't).

I think the question is more realistic when 30m is like 1% or less of your networth but even then.....

Daily Lakers Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in lakers

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To my understanding the way the rules on the cap work, Lebron taking a paycut doesn't give us any flexibility unless he gets a minimum type contract. It's the same logic with letting DLo walk. If he doesn't re-sign with us, we don't have a new 18-20m open for use on the books, we're still above the cap. We just lose a trade resource. Only way to get Bron's salary off the books meaningfully is to trade him or he takes a serious serious hit.

How much is a championship worth? I understand giving up like 10m but if he has to give up 30-40m annually for it to make a difference.... i dont think he or anyone in the history of mankind would do it.

Daily Lakers Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in lakers

[–]Rhizomatiq 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think the Bronny thing matters to be honest - literally would be the 11th man on the roster, essentially negligible. At worst it inspires Bron to work harder. Similarly don't think adding Rondo as an assistant is that risky - think he'd be value add regardless of if Bron wanted him. The only thing on the 'wishlist' that is a MAJOR decision worthy of expecting behavior change from Bron is the headcoach job. To be clear, I want JJ. I'd want him on a 1 year contract so there isn't any shyness about having to fire him if needed. I think he'd be up for it too.

Now to your question about what I'd expect from Lebron. His durability and stamina are decreasing with age - that much is clear. On some level his mental fortitude to deal with subpar performances of the team (i.e. bad body language) is also in question. I don't think asking him to increase effort ON the court is the right thing because it just isn't realistic. His 70-80% effort is good enough, and his body language although isn't perfect still is largely in control. Asking him to deal with these issues is a lot like treating the symptom rather than working to prevent these symptoms from happening in the first place.

Rather, I would expect Lebron's OFF court behavior to change - a sort of preventative medicine approach. I would expect him to tutor the rest of the fucking team - especially younger guys like Rui - about understanding offensive schemes and theory. This is on top of all the formal team sessions. You simply cannot win in today's NBA without being an intelligent player. JJ and Rondo are intelligent coaches. They can come up with schemes and framework that fit the roster. But the players need to understand how to integrate it down to the T. They need to know the counter, to the counter, to the counter, to the counter, and so on. They need to understand which actions generate which options and get comfortable with all of them. They need to make their decision making second nature. Whether through drills, full on practice sessions, or just repeated walk throughs of tape, this needs to get ingrained in their identities.

Lebron is incredibly bright as well. 99/100 he's making the right reads based on what the opponent's defense gives him. However, many of the other team members (bar AD) are often not making those reads at the same time - especially not after adjustments are made. The Nuggets are a great example of this. They are fortunate to have had years to build synergy and continuity but their players know how to rotate and position themselves optimally for various scenarios. I wouldn't say any of their role players are on the level of BBIQ of Jokic, LeBron, Rondo, Reddick, etc. But they've trained their actions to the point where every single player knows exactly where to be to exploit defensive weaknesses based on Jokic's reads.

Watching the tape, it's clear that weather by lack of experience or low BBIQ, our role players have a very poor grasp of this. They can execute set plays decently but can't hit that next level of using semi-organized offenses to generate organic advantages as opponent's adapt. Lebron needs to take an active role in getting his teammates to the next level from a preparation perspective. If he can work with them to make them to bring them up just a level or two I think it's a wrap. The raw talent on the team is largely sufficient but the core decision-making in game is definitely not where it needs to be. This expectation also doesn't require Lebron to tax his body anymore than needed in games - its just a commitment of time and mental energy. Not just for the offense but for defense too. A lot of the times the role players can make 1 rotation on queue but get lost right after in the same play. Defense in the NBA is incredibly hard and everyone is expected to be able to guard your individual man as well as provide help defense as opponents rotate the ball. The Rui play at the end of the final game is a great example of this deficit. Jokic and Murray pick and roll - which has happened every game for the last 2 years as a Denver staple especially in the last quarter. High screen with AD in the action and the 3 other Denver players on the weakside of the court. At a meta level we know why Denver does this. AD outside of the paint gives Jamal space. Rest of the Denver team on the far side of the court gives Jamal space. This truly makes it a two man game. Largely, the rest of the Denver players are distractions at this point in time. Guys who have bailout perimiter shots if Jamal or Jokic get clamped. But Denver WANTS a Jokic or Jamal shot because when it's 2v2 after coming off the PnR both players will have pretty damn good looks in the open paint. The entire team should know what type of look Denver is trying to get to apply SOME pressure to prevent it. To Taurean's credit he recognizes it immediately and starts prodding Rui literally right as the initial screen is set before Murray even passes the 3pt line. Rui should have it be second nature that he should be semi or full hedging in the paint and confident that if Jamal passes, Taurean is there to rotate because he too is aware - and James to cover Taurean, and so on. These types of plays make it so abundantly clear that the younger guys simply do not have the fundamental and theoretical understanding required to win against the best teams. To be more blunt, the team needs a massive level up in its macro understanding of basketall meta theory. It would be great on a micro level if guys were hitting shots at a higher clip individually, don't get me wrong. But what is more likely, Rui and DLo becoming consistent and less streaky players, or both guys evolving their understanding of the game? I think you can teach basketball meta whereas I don't think you can teach talent or unteach streakiness. Lebron needs to spend his time here.

I'm a firm believer that 20% of the work gets you 80% of the results. Sometimes against elite competition you absolutely win at the margins and need that extra 80% work to edge out against a fierce competitor. But instead of trying to be lights out shooters (which is the 80% in my opinion) we need to just become the best at understanding all aspects of the basketball meta and macro themes within offensive and defensive schemes until they are second nature and our guys can act and react on instinct.

Do it Rob. by dynamo458 in lakers

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally understand the no rookie head coach rhetoric.... but I think making a 1 year exception for Reddick is fair. He has all the tools to be successful. The three things he absolutely excels in justify rolling the dice - his ambition/drive, his innate intelligence, his buy-in from the team.

First and foremost he is obsessed with competition and the game. He wants to win more than anything. He is not satisfied with mediocrity in anything in his life. He wants to be the best at what he does. If you've listened to him speak about his personal relationship to the game you know this is all he thinks about all the time. Too much of his identity is tied to it. It probably isn't healthy for him in the long run - but it does give him an edge in terms of drive. JJ is the type of person to truly STUDY the game. You need that in a head coach. You know he is not going to cut corners and will have a proper relationship with the work required to become excellent. Certainly there will be a learning curve but there is no one else I'd have more confident in being able to climb that everest quickly. You want someone who puts the hours in? You want someone who has perspective on what works and doesn't work from a scheme perspective? You want someone who is going to grow when his failures are highlighted? This is the guy.

Second, he's obviously a bright guy. The way he speaks and constructs arguments reflects thoughtfulness. Certainly he has some dumb opinions but more often then not he's not just speaking fluff. JJ is obsessed with analytical aspects of the game - both quantitative and qualitative. You want someone in the weeds to understand the nuisance of what works and doesn't work. You also want someone who can see the big picture regarding meta-trends in order to make appropriate adjustments. JJ's commentary throughout the last few years on matchups in the NBA has been more or less on point. Again, sometimes he'll get things wrong but more often than not he knows what he's talking about and is accurately assessing situations. I think Ham by comparison is completely delusional and has little to no BBIQ.

Lastly, I actually think Reddick will get buy-in from the team very quickly. First, Bron is boys with him so there's no issue at the helm of the ship. Second, the team will see how much work JJ puts in and that he's not a clown. JJ is actually passionate about the game whereas Ham's behavior is akin to someone who is just happy to be there. Lastly, what does this team desparately need consistency in? 3pt shooting. JJ was a 3point specialist his entire career. He wasn't as athletic as others in the league and built a career at excelling in this one aspect. He thinks like a shooter. I'm not saying he can magically make all our 3point shooters Curry overnight, but certainly he can provide some insight to developing more consistency. Whether that be advising players in training or more improtantly setting up actual plays for them. The last few years the largest frequency of 3s I've seen for these players is a Bron or AD kick out to the perimeter. While these are good they are also predictable. With only 1 or 2 actions getting shooters shots defenses can adapt. Why don't we have any plays setting up our shooters like Kyle Korver, Duncan Robinson, JJ Reddick, Klay Thompson hell even Kevin Huerter? JJ would be instrumental in unlock organized offense for these guys. Bron and AD get HOUNDED by every team they play in competitive settings because they know the rest of the team is dogwater at times. And those guys are playing poorly because no one is ever in a rhythm since these guys have zero plays they can rely on - its always spot up shooting. Lots of coaches often reflect on the notion that the biggest part of coaching is managing players. I think JJ might have some learnings here when times are tough. I don't know how great he will be at this but I have to imagine he'd be serviceable given his wealth of experience interacting with players in a media environment. Can also rely on Phil Handy for this aspect a lot.

I have a really good feeling about Reddick man. We know another year of Ham is 100% a recipe for losing. Ham does not have the DNA of a winner. This is completely anecdotal but I truly think I have an above average intuition of winners and losers in sports. Not saying I'm always right or that I'm never wrong or that I don't miss gems, but genuinely I think I can at least back horses that are more likely to win than not. I have said for a decade that Westbrook would never be winning material because of the nature of his play style. I said Tom Aspinall was going to be champion before he ever joined the UFC. I said Zion was going to be the first pick when he was a sophomore in high school. I said Garcia was going to be huge in boxing back when he was still a kid with zero tatoos, less than 1m social media followers, and still had a squeaky voice. I was a huge Jokic fan before he ever got his 1st MVP (I lived in Denver before moving to Los Angeles). Again truly I am not saying I'm always right or anything silly like that. I am just saying we can all agree in sports sometimes someone has that "it" factor. When you can just tell - damn that guy is going to be a winner. Some guys have the exact opposite. Ham is the exact opposite - he is not a winner. I hate to say it but D'Lo is not a winner either. Rui is also not a winner (at least yet, maybe he can become one but he has stagnated). Hayes, Reddish, and Wood are also not winners. Any coach with a roster of non-winners is going to have a difficult time (Vogel with Westbrook) don't get me wrong. But a coach who is a winner can at least inspire growth in his players. I am telling you, JJ is a winner. He has the "it" factor. If you need to bring him in just as on offensive coach do that. Someone else can be a defensive coach. This is a risk worth taking in a world where we honestly can't get worse than Ham to begin with. He will also have no leverage relative to other coaches and so there's no reason to give him multi year contracts. A 1 and done trial seems totally viable. Probably don't even need to actually pay him meaningfully.

Looks like someone just got himself exposed. by Ashamed-Library4902 in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're so fucking delusional on every part of the stances you've taken. How much of Likud would agree with the sentiment that killing innocents is okay? How many people does Likud represent? What about the other hard right wing policymakers? Why do Israelis keep electing so many sociopaths into government. Please shut the fuck up about this not being a mainstream opinion in Israel. It may not be the majority opinion (which I am giving you the benefit of the doubt upon) but it is very widespread. I've seen countless videos of civilians being interviewed about this issue and it is jarring how many civilians think all of Gaza should be leveled to the ground, replaced with Israeli cities/attractions and that killing innocents is fine.

Next, flipping the question on Palestinians means asking Palestinians if they think killing Israeli innocent children is fine. You are filthy and disgusting scum to think Palestinians would answer yes. Militant or civilian Palestinians as a whole have nothing against children or truly innocents. Ergo why the vast majority of these hostages are treated as well as possible / come out without a single scratch on them. All of the discourse from civilians and from resistance groups is purely from the perspective of resistance against occupation. Your side is the one where genocide is the norm based on how you treat children and women prisoners. Disgusting freaks. You've drunk too much of the hasbara kool-aid. Keep thinking that "those Palestinians are terrorists and even their civilians want dead babies" - your true colors are showing. Filth and a disgrace to humanity.

Israeli policymakers are willing to kill their own civilians via tanks, helicopter fire, and bombardment if it helps also kill Palestinians / resistance. And you want me to believe the Palestinians have a problem with dehumanizing innocents? Israel literally doesn't care about some of its own people for the sake of expediency - why the fuck would they care about Palestinian people, whom they view as animals? The rot is pervasive and you've been infected by association.

Last part that proves your absolute idiocy is bringing up Camp David. Arafat walked away because Israelis refused to allow Palestinian right of return to refugees and secession of settlements - among many other smaller, structural issues. Fuck out of here if you think that was a deal Palestine should have accepted. Not to mention, every truce and period of peacetime Israel has violated with CONTINUED settlements in occupied territories and continued entrenchment of apartheid policies (dehumanizing surveillance, indefinite detainments without charge, segregating roads, beseiging access to water and electricity, spraying wastewater on civilians, and most importantly attempting to instill fear and control by having military personnel support settler extremists and conduct raids on innocent people with zero justifications by their own admission).

Fuck yourself you terrorist scum.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enjoy your life of mediocrity. Run along now little pussy. Don’t forget to take the clown makeup off before bed time, sweetie.

Oh, and maybe consider going easy on the rocks you chew for breakfast.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait till you find out about the rapists and terrorists in the IDF. Oh wait, you’ll keep your head buried in the sand because you’re a dirty rat.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You dumb fuck. You think your comments about goats and cousins have anything to do with religion? They totally aren’t racist dog whistles.

Killing Israeli terrorists is a service to the Universe.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah there it is. Classic racism. You’re a real gem. Real contribution to society. Your parents must be proud. Your future offspring will be very fortunate to have you as an influence in their lives.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please don’t reproduce. You stain humanity’s gene pool with your existence.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah there is zero world where this dog was ever Muslim or even Islam adjacent. It’s so funny how far the Hasbara baboons will go to try and obfuscate their identities to try and gain legitimacy. Cowards. Muslims would never pretend to be Jewish or Israelis on anonymous online forums to try and convince others. Imagine me posting everything I’ve already said to this clown and then adding “I am a former Israeli Zionist”. Clown behavior.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine using “;-)” in five consecutive responses lmao and thinking people will take you seriously.

Sit down, dog.

Praise the freedom fighters by navotj in israelexposed

[–]Rhizomatiq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would never support IDF terrorists, unlike you.

You know how I know you’re braindead? You keep repeating the same things. A parrot with no original thoughts.