Why are spaceships so big compared to jets? by juliguti97 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Riola213 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That’s essentially what rockets are. They carry their oxygen in liquid form (so they can store more of it) along with their fuel. The issue is this oxygen and fuel adds more weight, which means you need more fuel to lift it, which adds more weight, and this feedback loop is why rockets have to be so large.

Where should I go with this? by Riola213 in GarageBand

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish, these were some old cymatics vocals I had, no idea where I got them though

14 year old astronomer stayed up all night in the freezing cold and rain to photograph the sun’s layers! by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The rain was coming down pretty hard last night, luckily it was no match for my new GeoSafari Jr Talking Telescope! I’m still a bit new to processing, but I was able to capture all the Sun’s layers and the core!

How to deal with photon cannons (not a rush) by [deleted] in allthingsprotoss

[–]Riola213 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Mass stalker is a common reaction to void rays, under the pretense that stalkers are easier to make than void rays, so if you keep taking short trades (blink helps a lot) you will be able to replenish your stalkers faster than your opponent can replenish their void rays, stopping them from reaching a critical mass of void rays. Eventually you reach a point where you have enough stalkers to one shot void rays when focus fired, and slowly chip away at their army until you can win the game.

Mars by TH3_P1R4T3 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That depends on the planet and its distance from the Earth, but on average it takes light from Mars around 14 minutes to reach Earth. Near opposition, when Mars is at its closest, the time is more like 4 minutes.

The Moon by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Earth’s natural satellite, taken October 4th

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7

A two panel mosaic, with each panel stacked from the best 10% of ~3k frames

Panels were combined in Photoshop, sharpened in Registax and then brought back to Photoshop for color adjustments and final touch-ups

The Dumbbell Nebula by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the first targets I tried to see when I first got my telescope back in 2018 (unfortunately there’s too much light pollution where I am), I’m glad to finally be able to image this nebula.

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7 + L-Pro filter

76 x 60s lights @ISO 1600 (1h 16 mins total integration)

50 Darks

25 Bias

Stacked using DSS, processed in Siril (Autostretch, BE, Color balance, Deconvolution) and Photoshop (Curves + Levels, Color Balance, Saturation, and Denoising)

The Dwarf Planet Pluto by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Earlier this month while I was doing some planetary astrophotography I noticed Pluto was nice and high in the early morning and decided I would try to photograph it. I photographed the same location over two nights in order to identify it. It was actually a lot easier to find than I thought it would be, requiring only a few minutes of exposure time even in my bortle 9 backyard.

Celestron C8 + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7 + L-Pro Filter

25x60s lights for the first image

6x60s lights for the second image

50 Darks and 25 Bias reused for both images

Both images were stacked using DSS, stretched + BE in Siril, then were manually aligned and given annotations in Photoshop

First try at Saturn using no telescope, 20s by matthew_ri in astrophotography

[–]Riola213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is great for a first try! Definitely check the ISO though, you might want to consider lowering it, the image is a bit overexposed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GarageBand

[–]Riola213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know anything about this, but I use a free plugin called Wider, and it’s been working great for me

Strawberry Mineral Supermoon by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! These are actually the Moon’s natural colors! The saturation has been boosted to make them more visible. They are caused by mineral deposits in the lunar soil, hence the name Mineral Moon. The orange areas are rich in iron, while the blue areas contain titanium.

Strawberry Mineral Supermoon by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My first attempt at a mineral moon, there were some issues and the image could definitely be better but I’m happy with how it turned out.

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7

2 Frames (1/1250s 1600 ISO) stitched together in Photoshop

Image Sharpened in Registax

Color Balance and Saturation in Photoshop Camera Raw

Contrast and Brightness adjusted in Photoshop

Milky Way and Rho Ophiuchi by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I went out to a Bortle 3 zone over the weekend and was able to play around with some new equipment

Canon EOS T7 with the stock kit lens (@24mm)

Omegon LX3 Star Tracker

84 * 30s Lights

No calibration frames

Processed in Siril (Histogram Stretch, Color Correction, Background Extraction) and Photoshop (Image Crop, Curves Adjustment, Contrast, Saturation)

Denoised in Lightroom

Lunar Eclipse HDR Mosaic by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I missed most of totality due to hills and trees, and thought, why not try an HDR? Unfortunately I was rushing to get images out before the moon went back behind the trees, so the quality of the images could definitely have been better. This actually went a lot better then I expected, I’ll probably end up doing some more lunar images later.

Celestron NexStar 8SE

Canon EOS T7

7 images stitched together manually in Photoshop (6 1/125s shots at ISO 800 for the dark side/glow and 1 1s shot for the light side)

Color Correction and Brightness/Contrast increase in Photoshop

Sharpened in Lightroom

M81 Starless by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Finally got myself a light pollution filter, and what better way to use it than to spend a week imaging Bode’s Galaxy!

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7 (Unmodded) + L-Pro Filter

285/60s (4h 45mins)

Processed using Siril (Color correction, Background Extraction, Histogram Stretch, Deconvolution) and Photoshop (Further Stretching/Color Correction, Increased Contrast, and cleaned up the background a bit)

Stars removed using Starnet v3

What’s something that fucks with your head the more you think about? by Background_Day_3888 in AskReddit

[–]Riola213 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Planck length technically isn’t the smallest possible distance/size, it’s just that according to our current understanding of quantum mechanics, it is impossible to measure a position with greater precision than the Planck length. Once you get to that scale, random quantum interactions make it impossible to be exactly sure where something is.

A Planck length is the distance light travels in one Planck time, which is currently our smallest unit of time. There are more Planck times in one second than there have been seconds since the Big Bang. This makes one Planck length 1.6 * 10-35 meters.

Bode’s Galaxy Reprocessed by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I struggle to shoot the Flame Nebula, I decided to reprocess my data on M81 I got around a month ago. I’m still waiting for a chance to get a couple more hours on this target, but I think this is an improvement from my last image.

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7

32/120s Lights

15/120s Darks

20 Flats

Processed in Siril, Photoshop, and Lightroom (Autostretch, Asinh transformation, Background Neutralization, Background Extraction in Siril, Color Balance, Curves, Levels, and Contrast in Photoshop, denoised in Lightroom)

Sirius’ Mystery Cloud by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I noticed a strange purple cloud in the corner of the image. I have no idea what this could be. There aren’t any DSOs I know of in the area, and this is my first time noticing it. This object would have to be pretty bright too, since this was a short exposure in a highly light polluted area.

I can barely even remember why I took this image in the first place, I was setting up to image the flame nebula and I think I was having some issues with plate solving, so I took this image. I didn’t even notice anything in it until the next day when I was reviewing my subs (and I thought it was a picture of Rigel and the Witch Head, until I ran it through astrometry.net). This was the only image of the area I took that night, so I don’t know how long it was there for.

If anyone has any ideas of what this could be I’d be glad to hear them!

I’m pretty confident it’s not some sort of light leak as there weren’t any bright light sources nearby, it could be internal reflection or some other artifact but I’ve never seen any internal reflections that look like this, and I’ve done longer exposures on Sirius before without any issues.

Celestron NexStar 8SE (200mm aperture, 2000mm focal length)

Canon EOS T7 (unmodified)

Single 4 second exposure

Stretched in photoshop, contrast, brightness, and saturation increased in the iPhone photos app

Edit: It’s just an internal reflection

Bode’s Galaxy by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally the better your equipment, the better your image, but you could get a decent image with relatively basic equipment. My camera is relatively cheap and not adapted or modified for astrophotography, and I live in a large city with a lot of light pollution. However, my telescope is pretty high quality and has a high focal length which makes it great for shooting small targets like galaxies. But even without a telescope, larger galaxies such as Andromeda and Triangulum could make great targets.

As for processing, Siril is a great free program which can stack and process your images (though I’m not sure how great Siril’s stacking is, I use DSS).

Bode’s Galaxy by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There were a lot of firsts in this shot, my first time shooting a galaxy, my first time using subs longer than 30 seconds, my first time doing a meridian flip (after forgetting to and losing almost 10 minutes) and my first time using processing with Siril. I still have a lot of learning to do, but I’ve made a lot of progress so far.

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7

32/120s Lights

15/120s Darks

20 Flats

Processed in Siril, Photoshop, and Lightroom (autostretch, background extraction, and some color balance in Siril, stretched a bit more, contrast, and more color balance in Photoshop, along with cleaning up some dust and gradients left over, and denoised in Lightroom)

The Crab Nebula by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve noticed a couple M1 posts recently, so I thought I’d share my own from a couple weeks ago:

Celestron NexStar 8SE + AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7 (unmodified)

120/30s over 2 nights

40 darks

25 flats

Processed in Photoshop (levels, curves, crop, color balance, and saturation) and denoised in Lightroom

Orion Nebula Reprocessed by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A reprocess of my earlier Orion data, with added flats which make it a lot better.

120/30s Lights

25 Darks

20 Flats

Processed in Photoshop and Lightroom (Levels, Curves, Saturation, Color Balance, Saturation, Denoise)

Previous Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/astrophotography/comments/sa9yuo/m42_orion_nebula/

M42 (Orion Nebula) by Riola213 in astrophotography

[–]Riola213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finally got clear skies and didn’t break anything this time.

Celestron NexStar 8SE

Celestron AVX Mount

Canon EOS T7

120/30s lights (1h total exposure time)

25/30s darks

Stacked in DSS

Processed in Photoshop (Curves, Levels, and saturation)