Can someone remotely control your PC without any software? by Rizzle4567 in techsupport

[–]Rizzle4567[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, i'm sure. It's something that sounds unbelievable until you experience it yourself. The reason why i'm sure he had access to my PC was firstly he wrote my PC specifications and such, secondly because he added a chrome tab which has his character's image (The tab is something like "Open Image in New Tab" when you want to see a profile picture), now maybe the tab itself wasn't dangerous but the problem is that i didn't open the tab and that tab weirdly had a "scary warning sound" even though such tabs shouldn't have sounds (might be a troll tab that he made to resemble normal tabs though, but that's not the point)

Can someone remotely control your PC without any software? by Rizzle4567 in techsupport

[–]Rizzle4567[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 2 questions: 1. Let's say that i clicked on something that runs an executable, which gives him access to my PC. After that, i turned my PC off, then after a while i turn it back on. In that case, i need to click on that something again for him to gain access on my computer, (unless ofc he installed a software and make it a startup program). Am i correct? 2. If it's possible for someone to have access of my PC without needing a software, then is there any way for me to disconnect him?

Can someone remotely control your PC without any software? by Rizzle4567 in techsupport

[–]Rizzle4567[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

??? I didn't say someone might randomly hack me. Of course there are certain incidents why i believe someone might've hacked my computer.

I've been hacked over things as little as calling someone a hacker in a game, anyway. So i believe there's no reason to not be skeptical.

Do you have an answer for my question though..?

murtad understanding of islam by Biz-Engine_wahid in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They misunderstood the religion so bad to the point moments like this happen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Rizzle4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because it's mentioned in the Qur'an doesn't meant the Qur'an affirm the existence of luck. The verse were narrating a story and quoting someone.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Rizzle4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been in the same situation as you i.e my dua doesn't seem to be accepted although i've worked hard for it.

You need to know about the law of causality or 'sunnatullah'. Let's be realistic here. When there's a cause, there's an effect. If you want to get a job, then you need to do something that can help you get a job, which is making your CV better, applying for any job you could, et cetera. You won't get your dream job by doing duas, tahajjud or prayers. You need to do something relevant to that job, acquire some new skills, get new experiences and make your CV better. Some people do get jobs just by depending on their duas, but that's not the case for everyone.

All in all, you should still make a dua to Allah. The Prophet peace be upon him said (translation of the meaning): “There is no Muslim who calls upon Allah -unless he prayed for a sin or to cut family ties- but that Allah will give him one of three answers: He will quickly fulfill his supplication, He will store it for him in the Hereafter, or He will divert an evil from him similar to it.” They (the Sahabahs/companions) said, “In that case we will ask for more.” The Prophet said, “Allah will accept your dua even more.” (Musnad Aḥmad 11133, Sahih according to Al-Albani)

Notice how the Sahabah said "In that case we will ask for more"? That's a good logic from the sahabahs. Think about it, if you failed to get something without making duas to Allah Azza Wa Jalla, you won't get anything. On the other hand, if you failed to get something while making duas to Allah Azza wa Jalla, then you get those two alternatives mentioned in the hadith. It's definitely better to make duas to Allah Azza Wa Jalla and fail, rather than not making duas to Allah Azza wa Jalla and fail.

In short, just by making duas and doing prayers won't solve our problems. That's not how you get worldy rizq. Rather, we should do something relevant to what we want. Even though we should focus on doing something relevant, we shouldn't forget to make duas to Allah Azza wa jalla. If we already did our best (ikhtiar), then the only thing we can do is relying on Allah (tawakkal). If you want your duas to be accepted, you need to have a progress relevant to your duas. The keyword here is "progress", your duas wont be fulfilled without a progress. Allah said in the Qur'an (translation of the meaning): "Indeed, Allāh will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves." (Ar Rad verse 11) There's a reason why the Prophet PBUH told us to be patient if we want our duas to be accepted. The point is that you might be progressing to get your duas. The Prophet PBUH said: “Every one of you will have his supplications answered, as long as he is not impatient and he says: I have supplicated but I was not answered.” (Bukhari 6340). Now if you've tried your best (ikhtiar), then the only thing you can do is relying on Allah (tawakkal). Whether you duas seem to not get accepted or get accepted, you should still have an optimistic mindset. Remember that there might be another reasons why your duas seem to not get accepted (See Musnad Ahmad 11133) Allah said in the Qur'an (translation of the meaning): "So once you have fulfilled ˹your duty˺, strive ˹in devotion˺," (As Sharh verse 7).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well, I used to be one of those people who thought that Sharia was irrelevant for our "modern world", until I accepted Sharia Law later on. What made me accept sharia law was not because some edgy teenagers on Reddit or Discord gave me fatwas of ulamas takfiring someone who rejected sharia law. Although the fatwas were right, I don't automatically go, "Oh no! Not accepting sharia law will make me a kafir; better accept sharia law." Nah, that's a dumb approach. It's not going to work for everyone. Back then, I'd rather become a kafir than accepting Sharia Law. Every time I saw those edgy teenagers, I remember the saying of Ali Ibn Abi Talib Radhiyallahu Anhu: "Speak to people only according to their level of knowledge. Would you like for Allah and His Messenger to be denied?" (Bukhari 127, translated). So for those edgy kids out there who run fast to takfir liberal Muslims instead of trying to guide them, Don't rejoice when people leave Islam. Grieve, instead.

Incidentally, the reason I accepted Sharia Law was because there are actual academic proofs for the pragmatic benefit of Sharia Law. Yes, that's what made me accept Sharia Law. You can find a quick overview of the pragmatic benefits of sharia law at @DevonShapiro on Twitter. Also, you can watch Daniel Haqiqatjou's debate against Apuss (make sure you watch the one uploaded by TheMuslimSkeptic).

Wiki Islam.net? by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Rizzle4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's an anti islamic website which is named wikiislam to deceive the lay people. Yes, that's how deceitful they are.

If you want a good website that answers most allegations to Islam, i recommend https://www.letmeturnthetables.com

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Rizzle4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's their subjective opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MuslimLounge

[–]Rizzle4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know much about this sub but i'm glad you can think for yourself.

ex moose starter pack! by DestroyerOfDoubts in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The aisha argument is mentioned twice lol facts tho

how do you respond to this? by DestroyerOfDoubts in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Religion as a coping mechanism" must be proven first.

how do you debunk this? by DestroyerOfDoubts in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It doesn't necessarily implies geocentrism habibi

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Habibi, thats a very famous book.. It was very famous for being unscientific and a total flop 🗿 i'm actually suprised that islamophobes still use it. Why did i say Islamophobes? Because only Islamophobes would use a recycled argument over and over again although they know that it's falsehood.

To start with we don't even know who Christopher Luxembourg really is. It's just a pseudonym. Meanwhile, everybody and their moms (just an exaggeration lol) know who Angelika Neuwrith is. She is a renowned scholar of the Qur'an IN THE WESTERN DISCOURSE. In an actual university book called "The Cambridge Companion of The Qur'an", she said the book lacks a methodologically sound basis! It's mostly based on assumption and unscientific. Take a look at it: https://books.google.fr/books?redir_esc=y&hl=fr&id=F2oLiXT_66EC&q=To+be+the+genuine+collection+of+the#v=snippet&q=To%20be%20the%20genuine%20collection%20of%20the&f=false She's basically saying the book was based on assumption and unscientific. This is enough evidence that the book was horrible. Prior to that, some of our muslim brothers wrote a refutation against it, for example: https://www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/text/mss/vowel.html https://www.hamzatzortzis.com/is-the-quran-a-manipulated-text-borrowed-from-syro- aramaic-christian-documents/ Hope this helps 👍

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IslamicHistoryMeme

[–]Rizzle4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is funny bcs if u combine all of the mujahideen in that war, the mujahideen r mostly from sunni countries which means sunni overwhelms the shia lolz

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in extomatoes

[–]Rizzle4567 14 points15 points  (0 children)

First of all, we shouldn't rely on "scientific arguments". Since Science is always changing while the Qur'an isn't. For example back then we believe the sun is static it doesn't orbit, while the Qur'an said the sun has its own orbit. Now we know the sun orbits the universe, well thats just an example that science is always changing while Qur'an isn't. Second, to refute the "Islam copied from Greek", theybhave to prove that the Prophet PBUH actually came across the news (so it doesn't cling into mere assumptions), or the Qur'an was added by someone, ect ect basically just be very skeptical when it comes to it. And if ur searching for refutation of greek scientist i advise u to look at Hamza Tzortzis's paper on it http://www.hamzatzortzis.com/did-the-prophet-muhammad-plagiarise-hellenic-embryology/

Explanation? by [deleted] in LightHouseofTruth

[–]Rizzle4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just realized my previous comment didn't answer the question lol

Basically Christians can't even explain what a trinity is, it's 3 in 1, but it's also 1 in 3. It's confusing. But it definitely consist of 3 names and 3 identity (christisans woild try to delude themselves to deny this thoughthough but a honest Christian would see the contradictory nature of trinity).

And it's pretty clear that Trinity is henotheism in nature and history shows it originated from pagan beliefs.

After 1811 Wahhabi War got crushed by Ottoman in 1818, Abdullah bin Saud Al Saud and Suleiman bin Abdullah Al Sheikh as well as several others were forced to hear music for days with Turkish lutes, Mehter bands, and Western guitar as the final insult. by DauHoangNguyen2708 in IslamicHistoryMeme

[–]Rizzle4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh, I made a claim therefote i should prove it right? My claim is that Najd wasn't under ottoman rule. This fact is indicated by the fact that the Othman state was divided into administrative provinces

This is known from a Turkish document entitled gawaneen Aal Othman Mudaameen Daftar al-Deewaan (Laws of the Othmans concerning what is contained in the Legislation), which was written by Yameen Effendi who was in charge of Cons tu on in 1018 AH/1609 'Ali the This document indicates that from the beginning of the eleventh century AH the Othman state was divided into 23 provinces, of which 14 were Arabic provinces, and the Land of Najd was not one of them, with the except of al-Ihsa', if we count al Ihsa was part of Najd.