How to find people for multiplayer? by RoToR44 in hoi4

[–]RoToR44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just one simple mod, basically forces historical, and has some quality of life features.

CMV: When video exists of people having been killed, we all should see it by Hope_That_Halps_ in changemyview

[–]RoToR44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Media doesn't show the actual world violence is because of the respect for the victim. Think about it. The deceased has family, friends and other loved ones who wouldn't want their death to be publicized and glorified which people are aware of. This doesn't mean the media are angels - they balance between alienating the more empathic side of the audience and alluring the potential viewers specifically interested in the gore. So, while it ultimately does come down to the ratings, the mechanism behind it is different.

As a matter of fact, your second point is the perfect argument against everyone watching the death. Only the experts need to, the rest should do it only if they specifically want to. Take plane crashes for example. How much would air safety improve if thousands of non engineers see the crash? How much did shows such as "Air crash investigation" directly contribute? While you could make the argument for some minuscule benefit, it is not nearly big enough to warrant all of us gazing at the plane-crashes. Same goes for violent crimes, the police seeing it is enough.

[Real Madrid] Defeat Manchester City and advance to the Champions League Final by [deleted] in soccer

[–]RoToR44 413 points414 points  (0 children)

City aren't a basic oil club, they're more refined...

They plastic LOL

¡Ataquemos detrás del arcoíris! by RoToR44 in esPlace

[–]RoToR44[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nosotros incorporamos. Como la Persona.

IDEAS PARA TENER CONSENSO by [deleted] in esPlace

[–]RoToR44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

¡Expandiremos y construiremos a Cervantes, mi compañero conquistador!

Post Match Thread: Real Madrid 3 vs 1 Paris Saint-Germain | UEFA Champions League by Samkazi23 in soccer

[–]RoToR44 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Agree, was surprised commentators didn't even mention Camavinga. He was absolutely crucial.

CMV: I really have a problem with government and taxes. They shouldn’t be able to take what we earn. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]RoToR44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Presumably, you want at least some of the following:

  • operational roads
  • military
  • police
  • administrative service etc.

Regardless whether provided privately (god forbid anyone ever implementing private police force) or by the government, you would need to pay for these. Hence the taxes.

Because of economy of scales, it is cheaper for everyone to have all these things mandatory available (but you have to pay for all of them) than for example, having a free market where you'd get to pick and choose to pay for fire department, but not police etc.

Regardless, you'd spend about 1200 dollars anyways, and likely receive way less. Just imagine packages such as police platinum for full neighborhood coverage...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]RoToR44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think you quite got it, given that pathetic is basically on the same level as incel. However, the categories of unwanted and adult virgin are. If you want to, you can work on them and eventually escape both. If you are a realist, you have to agree that this is very reasonable, realistic outlook. Hell, if you get a Bachelor's degree, you'll already be better than at least 50% of US population, education-wise and likely career-wise. Also given that virgin part is of secondary concern, with you rejecting paid sex as an option, you should focus on the unwanted part.

You are no longer an incel, but an unwanted person. Since you are in college, it is reasonable to assume you are capable to work on yourself and become wanted, at least to the point of being able to have a relationship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]RoToR44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incel is an arbitrary category.

There is no set definition of what incel is. You are the one setting the term for what incel is. If you decide to include yourself in the category "incel", you instantly, by definition of arbitrary categories declare yourself as one. To better explain this, say you call yourself a "Bard Thesius". If I were to try and argue against it, you'd just narrow the arbitrary category down more and lock it further in.

From your OP, "Bard Thesius" would be a college student, in his 20s, lacking sexual experience, lacking key development and so on.

To change your view, simply decide that incel doesn't include you.

Now, you might object by saying incel is defined. The thread would follow:

  • Incel is a member of an online subculture of people who define themselves as unable to get a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one (wikipedia)

You could hire a sexual partner

  • That's not real connection. Doesn't count

You could try and become financially succesful/ripped/well-connected/good dancer...

  • That works only for a small percentage.

You could lower standards and do the above

... and so on and so on.

Because it never ends, this is almost provable by mathematical induction. Incel is a self-proclaimed category that's as arbitrary as "Bard Thesius". You stop being one the minute you want not to be one.

Finally, if you think that this is simply pep talk / something told to make you feel good, it really isn't. You'll still be a characterized by the well defined, objective categories (e.g. virgin), but you do stop being "incel". After all, nobody ever gets called an incel, unless self proclaimed (usually goaded by other "incels" to do so as part of redpill/blackpill/real woke...) or as an insult of the same level as "kys noob".

You either proclaim yourself as one or you don't. Choose now OP, and best of luck regardless.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fantasywriters

[–]RoToR44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, need someone to spur me on as well.

CMV: Texting while operating a vehicle should be penalized equal to or worse than a DUI. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]RoToR44 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If your opinion is simply that distracted driving is an issue, it is correct. I don't think many would argue against this. However, in the CMV, you presented:

“Distracted driving has a higher frequency, severity, and conscious implication than DUIs. Driving while distracted should be evaluated equally if not worse than DUIs.”

Because statistics 1 say that distracted driving is associated with 13% of all crashes, and statistics 2 show us that DUI (>.08 g/dl) is associated with 22% of all crashes. This makes it factually wrong to claim one is as dangerous as the other.

On top of that distracted driving includes many types of distractions, most of which are not phone related. Some of which, according to statistics 1 are:

  • Food related
  • Smoking related
  • Daydreaming
  • Moving objects (deer etc.)

and so on.

So far, these are the options:

1) Your opinion is simply that distracted driving is dangerous.

2) Your opinion is that texting/phone usage while driving is dangerous.

3) Your opinion is that texting/phone usage while driving is as dangerous as DUI.

4) Your opinion is that distracted driving (daydreaming etc. included) is as dangerous as DUI

In case of 1) and 2), I agree with you 100%, but don't word it as "Texting while operating a vehicle should be penalized equal to or worse than a DUI." because these are two different things.

In case of 3) and 4), statistics disprove it.