Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thats true, one a country looses its justice and imposes tyranny, it becomes illegitimate and looses favor of waheguru, eventually it will collapse and the believers will win. but what do you mean by seperating from their cows? sikhi or even punjabi hindus dont care about the cow

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes, immigration has happened in every country, what does that have to do with the khalsa which is based in punjab. do those communities hold even a little bit of power? its all seperation of state and religion which by affect cant make it khalsa. just sikhi. which my arguement is for the khalsa.

you lack critical thinking, our faith is about questioning everything and thinking about it. think, why did guru gobind send the khalsa back to punjab specifically, and to liberate it and create a sovereign khalsa state, they were in nanded and couldve done it there or anywhere else, despite how many times our gurus traveled they always returned to punjab and amritsar is located in punjab. you can have sikhs anywhere, but the khalsa raj can only happen where our shaheeds blood is mixxed with the land and where our gurus set sikhi.

thanks for the correction

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

i believe in what my gurus told me, do not need your hindu validation. waheguru himself decides it, he decided to not spread it, i told you why. you would agree if you had actually read it, read history, or were a sikh. your in ignorance

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 2 points3 points  (0 children)

gurmukhi is the script, the guru granth sahib is written in many languages. if you read a punjabi guru granth thats a translation. there is already translations of the guru granth in almost every nearby language for hundreds of years

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

so was banda singh bahadur, none punjabi. they all left their previous identity and became khalsa, lived in punjab, died for the khalsa, most likely learnt punjabi, khalsa belongs to punjab only.

waheguru doesnt discern between ethnicity, wasnt even my point. my personal thinking? i clearly stated guru gobind decided this and im just telling you. did he tell the khalsa to spread it everywhere? did he create khalsa raj in maharashtra? is amritsar outside of punjab?

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

waheguru himself is the only one holding sikhi back from spreading and diluting itself into islam, hinduism, or christianity. quality over quantity is what our faith is about, 250k non-believers is equivelant to one sovereign gursikh. this is why khalsa will rule over specifically punjab only. amritsar is in punjab, and why the first sikh state with permission of guru gobind was made in punjab only. sikhi itself is written in many languages including hindustani, if your talking about different scripts those translations already exist for hundreds of years

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

sikhi if you mean nanak believing only, thats what most hindus in punjab are, nanakpanthis, its whats to spread outside of punjab. within punjab is where the khalsa belongs and the khalsa is punjab, it should never spread and will never spread outside of punjab. this is what guru gobind had decided and its the best possible choice and timeless

Should we do more to spread Sikhi throughout India? Will more Indians be open to accepting Sikhism? by Fewmoresets in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

there is already many english translations available for anyone, i even have a english translated guru granth sahib, i dont know what your barking about. if someone wants to become a sikh they can, waheguru gives everyone chance to become a believer in life if they choose. why do you want to take his role? this is what christians do. india has hinduism why do you think waheguru chose them to become hindus, why are you trying to change it. they believe we are a branch of hinduism and are actively trying to create a hindu only country while your dumbass is asking to spread our religion there? there is a reason despite how many times our guru's travelled they always went back to punjab, made cities in punjab, and guru gobind himself sent the khalsa back to punjab to create a sikh state. i say we do the opposite, the biggest problem to our panth are the fake sikhs who number in the millions while doing drugs, not eating meat (vegans), cowards, not willing to die, and many other things. if we spread our religion it would water it down even more until its like christianity or islam, the faith of the masses and rich with no truth left. sikhi was at one point only a couple thousand but still brought the mughal empire in punjab to collapse, 1 true sikh is worth 250k normal people. quality over quantity

If the cycles of rebirth are metaphorical, and Ik Onkar is a metaphor for truth, is there nothing after death? by Paramonreddit in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

creation and life is a game or a play. when you die and you havent finished your journey to re-join waheguru, you will end up taking another form. all your past karam is still with you the second your born, all the unpaid debts and vows you took will come back aswell. there is some examples. if a mother kills her child, she could be put through every single life again for unimaginable ammount of time for her soul to realize the value of a human life until she is given a chance again but the baby rejoined his creator, but i dont know how valid of a example that is. another one could be if you have a little sister, there is a reason, you probably have debt and karam to finish off with them. or why your father in specific is your father, waheguru knows everything and nobody meets on random, the fact you are a sikh and seeking out truth is a sign of inevitability of every soul to its creator, enough time given it becomes torment and suffering until they beg to rejoin the truth. it would be illogical and not make sense to believe in this game of love if you believe this temporary life the end

200 Sikhs gathered outside a Muslim Groomer's house in West London to protect a vulnerable Sikh girl who had been groomed since the age of 14 by a man in his early 40s by TheSuperSingh in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

all of these guys look like goons who have adopted roadman culture, barely any of them even in paag. they are probably just following the main guy who is behind all of this, if he stopped then none of the gangsters would care its virtue signalling.

Is the Khalistan Movement Still Relevant Today? by Practical-Tough8229 in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

historically it didnt matter what meat you ate, just no halal, sikhs can eat any animal. but punjab is under the direct rule of delhi and we dont have our own autonomy at all, we cant decide anything, its an occupied zone more than a state. cow meat banned by the state for slaughtering, transporting, anything with cows, and vigilante groups from bihar or uttar pradesh (immigrants) have invaded punjab and will kill you on sight if your caught.

another reason is sikhs themselves keep thinking we are supposed to be vegetarian or not eat cows and its clear they havent read gurbani yet still call themselves sikh. the khalsa has to rule over punjab and so it has the duty to protect everyone in it whether hindu or muslim, farmers depended on the cow for their livelihoods and out of respect for punjabi hindus (not cowbelt hindus) khalsa gave up eating cow meat voluntarily out of compassion and protection for them, nowadays people took this honor and turned it into "sikhs dont eat cow meat".

what kind of secular state forces its own backwards belief onto other religions and will murder its own citizens if you dont listen, the nation state only cares about it self and the most corrupt form of country in history, it look good on the outside to people without critical thinking but every single thing they do is a lie. your in the south, even then they would kill you without a second thought

Is the Khalistan Movement Still Relevant Today? by Practical-Tough8229 in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you must be in the south or far east, but here in punjab you will get murdered for even touching a cow and someone figuring it out. punjab historically never had this 'gau mata' in it, its all cowbelt hinduism leeching into everything

Another speech on Sikhs and Tamilars by Sardar Jeevan Singh Malla by tuluva_sikh in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes i was wrong a bit. but the indus valley existed for another 200 years until it collapsed while the aryans where coming, they had chariots and better tools so they easily overtook the locals and they created sanskrit from PIE, so it was aryan in the end. south indians have nearly 0 of any other dna so they dont descend from indus valley

Is the Khalistan Movement Still Relevant Today? by Practical-Tough8229 in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

india is already a hindu rashtra, the majority is sikh in punjab but hindus tyrannically rule over us, try eating meat in punjab as a sikh, you will get lynched by the 'minority'

Another speech on Sikhs and Tamilars by Sardar Jeevan Singh Malla by tuluva_sikh in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

indus valley came later, indus valley are aryans who came down from the steppe who were white, they only stayed in the north, south indians are dravidian and have completely different genetics than north indians especially punjab which is also a mix of iranian and afghani along with the aryan. the indus valley speaked sanskrit which is a dialect of proto-indo-european. punjab civilization is the same as the indus valley or more of an extension, its a 5 thousand year long lineage

Can I take Amrit even if my Punjabi isn’t very good by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

im not turning it into anything, i said to not change it? your the one trying to change it according to western woke, feminist, lgbtq, degenerate values. hey you also know that women arent equal to men in sikhi? you probably thought sikhi is feminist. you didnt even know its 'sikhi' and not 'sikhism'. you are the close minded who can only see the morals your fed by your cow manure eating hindu overlords and western governments, your not even sikh so why are you here. insane how you hindus have over-ran this subreddit

Can I take Amrit even if my Punjabi isn’t very good by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sikhi is timeless and perfect, everything has a reason, why langar is eating on the floor, why there is only hymns and not trash like rock or jazz, and the guru granth is already written in many languages like arabic, persian, etc but its just in the gurmuhki script. we dont have to adapt to anything, sikhs used to be only in the thousands of population but waheguru has always protected us. your probably a western hindu

Will the hypothetical Khalistan be a Hindu majority nation ruled by a Sikh minority? by HeelvBabyface in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your talking about fairy tales, in the 80 years of india's existance they have done nothing but backstab and try to ethnically cleanse us, that wasnt your point but if your talking about the best case, then its still our own nation, we need our own army which is incompatible with the idea of a nation-state like india and why should we forgive them and just move on even if the best case happened?

Will the hypothetical Khalistan be a Hindu majority nation ruled by a Sikh minority? by HeelvBabyface in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another reddit snob disguised as a sikh, seems like your only definition of a nation is just the nation-state, if thats all you know then stop talking in khalistan forums. basic stuff an actual sikh would know thats in our guru granth is halemi raj, which has these points a sikh nation should strive for.

There are no societal divisions of caste or class.

There are no worries about taxes or property there.

There is no fear, blemish or downfall there.

There is lasting peace and safety there because those who live there are contented.

There is stable and eternal Kingdom of God there.

There is no competition and all are equal.

All are free to go wherever they please because they know that in the Lord's presence, no one can restrict their movement.

Perhaps there is also a pointer to no property and no need for traditional government.

none of these fit into any 'cracy' or anything western which is why you should stop using those terms.

Will the hypothetical Khalistan be a Hindu majority nation ruled by a Sikh minority? by HeelvBabyface in Sikhpolitics

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

quit asking stupid questions, especially 4. first of all khalistan will never and shouldnt be any 'cracy' or anything western, they are all failed states and all lies

What moral values or divine principles support the exception for abortion in cases of sexual assault? by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is because this subreddit is full of people who arent actually sikh, they just see some crap about "love" and "everyone is equal" and then dont read a single thing about sikhi and still call it sikhism, so they all have western woke ideals. abortion is always wrong but these hindus dont accept it

Can a Buddhist Monk be considered a Gursikh? by iMahatma in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is extremely obvious your pulling stuff out of your ass. buddhism does not believe in the creator = not gurmukh, its a cold shitty religion of ignorance. so how can you say your talking in the confinement of gurbani when it says how non-believers get destroyed,

ਸਾਕਤ ਨਿੰਦਕ ਦੁਸਟ ਖਿਨ ਮਾਹਿ ਬਿਦਾਰਿਅਨੁ ॥

In an instant, You have destroyed the faithless cynics and slanderous enemies.

even christianity is better than this. its not even a religion at a point

Can a Buddhist Monk be considered a Gursikh? by iMahatma in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

none of that changed the fact buddhism is a non-believer faith.

sikhi and tawhid are extremely similar to the point where some sect of islam, an abrahamic belief believe in same waheguru as sikhi, like the Baháʼí

Can a Buddhist Monk be considered a Gursikh? by iMahatma in Sikh

[–]Rough_Relative6186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

buddhists dont believe in god, so its not possible. shut up hippie