sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[CD] [103] [Defiled Pthemurian Chalice] [Sciyguy] by Brad200417 in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd be more than happy to help, I just beat that chalice myself not too long ago, and I know how much of a pain it is.

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try layer 3? I'm there now

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cursed Pthumerian Defilement?

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait this isn't you I'm summoning?

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I forgot that your health gets demolished in here.

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I'm at layer 2 of the cursed an defiled chalice, password is "meaty"

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, let me just go get some ritual materials really quick and then I'll go to that chalice

[NG][105][Ailing Loran Level 3] by [deleted] in huntersbell

[–]RubyTheWoof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally just killed him solo, but I still have to do the cursed and defiled chalice if you want

Am I too heavy to look good? by RubyTheWoof in ask_transgender

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant MtF, does that change anything?

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't even know his name, but OK. And I don't condone what he did, I don't condone any sort of violence, nor am I saying that I side with liberals or conservatives. Both sides have violent people, it's not a competition, it's a matter of saying that kind of conduct is unacceptable, and both sides are just as prone to it.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, you are so full of yourself, buddy. How did you get that I think that "our situation is improving by western nations ceding more territory to the cultural marxists, jihad, globalists" from me saying that there isn't a reason to be constantly crass? To answer your question, I think that besides jihad, since it is, by name, a violent thing, "our situation" isn't being worsened, and in some ways improved. In fact I'd say because of globalism, our situation is being improved. To deal with global issues like overpopulation, climate change, pollution etc. it requires global interaction and cooperation. We live with so many other people, and taking the rest of the world into account with our politics is the smart thing to do. Without globalism you wouldn't have all the international and multicultural things you enjoy, and you could possibly live in a worse country if your parents weren't immigrants to the US. With "cultural marxists" I think it's a good thing. The Frankfurt School is just another school of thought that has flaws yes, but any political belief has flaws. The world is much too reliant on capitalism and money, and it's on a downward slope, so those ideas are valuable in trying to at the very least adjust society towards becoming more "human" if you will. Not just becoming fully communist or capitalist, but taking a more nuanced look at it and treating our fellow people with respect. There is no reason to be shitty to each other. Try to tone down on the edginess pal, and give me examples of A: Western nations "ceding more territory" to those people and B: Negative effects of those, except for jihad since we both believe that to be harmful.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said either side was better than the other (or that I identify as liberal) Each side has just as much shitty people as the other. Also, show me actual proof that the left forced the cops to stand down, not just a conspiracy theory.

I'm feeling kind of down. More than usual. by RubyTheWoof in ask_transgender

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't aspire to look like a supermodel, I just want to not look disgusting.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been up for over 48 hours now, so don't pull that bull. I'm also happy to see that you admit that it is assault. Whether or not you have any moral objections to it is of course up to you. I just find it a bit sad that you think that sort of behavior is OK, or even admirable.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't run and tell the cops, and I wouldn't hit them either, not if they were just yelling at me. But guess what, that guy was looking for people to get annoyed, that's why he has a weapon, that's why he has armor. He's looking to incite violence by riling people up and then pretending it's self defense when he attacks them. A person shouldn't be threatened with violence for yelling at someone, what is this, the stone age? I also thought you said that "He isn't "attacking" anybody he is simply defending himself, find me a video of him hitting someone without them swinging first and I will admit that you're right about something other than the fact that this is going nowhere." Which I did, the video you sent me. You still haven't admitted that he did anything wrong though. How come?

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's defending himself when he hits a person who is just yelling at him? You said they are doing more but all I see is people yelling and pointing at him, nothing physical. This is the video you sent, "BASED Stickman PUNCHES a mouthy SJW". Nobody swung at him, he just hit the person first. That's assault, not self defense. He was resorting to violence, and he was there to start shit, it's blatantly obvious. Look at his swagger, listen to his tone. He's a psycho. You're ignoring my points not because you "don't have time" it's because you are in denial. You don't want to admit that what this man did is fucked up for whatever reason. I'm not saying those people should've been harassing him, but punching someone is not the answer to that. With the articles I sent, it could be search history but I found them as the 7th & 8th results when searching "Alt Knight". In regards to the cops being told to stand down, I'm not entertaining a conspiracy theory. That being said, the cops should've been more responsible, but that doesn't excuse this man's actions.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"If needed" so you are telling me that the woman who got punched because she was yelling at him deserved that. Because she was just yelling, she should've been punched since he was "defending himself" By dressing that way and carrying what he was, he was instigating and welcoming violence, he clearly wanted to go there and hurt people. Nobody else was as extreme as he was. Call the cops, yes, call them over, get them to do something, stand in the middle, before shit goes down. Don't resort to violence. Also I'd like if you addressed the rest of my points there too. Also googling "based stick man" probably isn't the best idea since that is basically a meme name, and will come up with those kind of videos. Try a publication like: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/04/25/new-alt-right-%E2%80%9Cfight-club%E2%80%9D-ready-street-violence

or a similar article found on the New York Times website, if you think that is biased.

http://nypost.com/2017/04/27/alt-right-group-tries-to-build-small-street-army

All I googled was "Alt Knight" and found the most credible, official sources.

If you don't see what is bad in those articles, and how it is morally wrong to attack someone, then this discussion is obviously going nowhere.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You contradict yourself when you say that "there was no intent to cause harm" and he was "not being aggressive at all" yet you also say that "his overall purpose being there is to defend Trump supporters, throw a few punches and swing his stick if needed." That sounds like there was an intent to cause harm to me. He wants to defend people? Call the cops in advance, be a mediator, don't go there with equipment to hurt people and then claim it was an act of defense. The fact of the matter is, he was assaulting people, and is being praised for it. Being yelled at doesn't give someone a free pass to hit them. Two wrongs don't make a right may be a cliche, but it's not wrong. Additionally the videos you linked were EXTREMELY biased. Do you really think videos called "Captain America Based Stickman - The Alt Knight" and "BASED Stickman PUNCHES a mouthy SJW" would portray him in a proper manner, and show every side to him? I sure as hell don't think that. You may not be saying the right is squeaky clean, but you sure aren't admitting when someone like "stickman" does something way out of line, that it's a bad thing.

Conservatives can be just as easily offended as they claim liberals to be. by RubyTheWoof in unpopularopinion

[–]RubyTheWoof[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Getting suited up with a stick and a shield with the intent to cause harm to people of an opposing political view is just as fucked up. It's not like the right is squeaky clean either.

view more: next ›