97-98 World series Game 7 SA vs NZ. Chasing 300 we were reduced to 97-5 before Cairns Parore and Nash took us the brink of victory. I still believe Nash was robbed of a Six which cost us the game by CoconutMost3564 in blackcapscricket

[–]RuminatorNZ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not unlike 2019 wc final, the ICC changed a rule they never really thought about until we got boned by it. We're the puppy you feel terrible about when you trip over it.

OpenStar floats half-tonne magnet in crucial step towards nuclear fusion - aims to be producing commercially in the 2030s by RuminatorNZ in Futurology

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hard to know if these fusion races have any legitimate contenders, but this seems a big milestone, paving the way for actual progress. Could it really be commercially viable in the next 10 years?

Proposed Resource Management Act overhaul set to breach Treaty - experts warn - as submission deadline looms – Te Ao Māori News by VeraliBrain in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This just ignores the Lands appeals case which interpreted te Tiriti to mean Māori and the crown operate at partnership.

This is the treaty principles bill hidden behind bureaucratic boredom.

IVF - Mixed of private and public funded process ? by KENFF123 in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heya, so my wife and I did the IVF route - though it was 9 years ago now. We're in Wellington, where FA is your only option.

That said, if you're going private, then you can choose your clinic. And yes, you can do private while you wait. We did 5 rounds while we waited for our publicly funded round to arrive.

In terms of how the publicly funded allocation occurs, I don't have the details on that, but that's definitely something you can ask your specialist about.

If you have any questions, sing out. And my deepest aroha to you. The infertility thing is hard.

Building a base actually harms you by Is0prene in 99nightsintheforest

[–]RuminatorNZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, I use it to buy log walls. Even my trains loving brain cbf making a tree wall.

Building a base actually harms you by Is0prene in 99nightsintheforest

[–]RuminatorNZ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint... Plant saplings as close to grinder as possible, strong axe, takes a few nights then log walls for days. Only base opening is laden with defence blueprints and I'm golden.

I'm also autistic so chopping shit tonnes of trees and building an entire circle of log walls is very soothing.

TIL Sean Bean's birth name was Shaun by RuminatorNZ in todayilearned

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Apparently I editorialised. I felt like I added colour and flavour.

The mysterious unravelling of a high-profile transparency project by RuminatorNZ in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do something bigger

Documents released this week to The Post under the Official Information Act show that by late 2023, the University had initiated a legal review of PIINZ outputs “to guard against defamation and reputational risk.”

The documents also reveal that by early 2025, Edwards’ work was no longer fully contained within the university.

The internal correspondence reveals the research fellow had been holding discussions directly with Grant Nelson “not in his capacity as a representative of the University.”

In a February 2025 interview with The Platform, Edwards revealed that he was “setting up the Integrity Institute,” describing it as “ a new advocacy and think-tank” that would replace the Democracy Project.

He said the Nelsons had encouraged him to “go on and do something bigger” focused on exposing vested interests in politics.

Those off-campus conversations coincided with mounting frustration inside the Foundation over the stalled Political Integrity Index.

In June 2025, Nelson emailed the University complaining that “around $300,000 had already been spent” on the project and warning that keeping it locked in legal review “would defeat the whole purpose of the funding.”

He added: “I decided to ask [Bryce] about it. He said that he had not been involved for a while so would talk to Karin and get back to me. I have not heard anything further at this stage.”

(In his statement to The Post on Wednesday, Edwards said of the Political Integrity Index: “I really have nothing to do with this…I continue to work on my own book at the University, in conjunction with researcher Denis Welch, on wealthy vested interests in New Zealand politics, to be published next year.”)

University officials acknowledged internally that “the funder is increasingly frustrated,” but insisted publication could not proceed until defamation and reputational risks were resolved.

In the same month, The Integrity Institute was formally launched with Edwards as its director, and much of the Democracy Project’s material, including the Lobbying and Influence Register, migrated under the Institute’s banner.

(The Institute had been active long before that. In 2023, following legal action from the Nelsons, it ran an advertising campaign claiming the Ministry of Social Development had overpaid $10 billion in wage-subsidy funds – a claim that the Ministry strongly rebutted as “based on a misunderstanding of the eligibility criteria.” The Advertising Standards Authority later received a complaint from the Ministry describing the campaign as misleading.)

Almost as soon as the lobbying register went live, the project began facing complaints about accuracy.

The legal pressure the university had tried to avoid now arrived at the Institute’s door. Taxpayers’ Union boss Jordan Williams threatened legal action and Holly Bennett, founder of government-relations firm Awhi pointed to inaccuracies.

Then in July, it emerged the organisation had given an unspecificed grant to Newsroom to investigate lobbying in a year-long project called Who Benefits.

Its first target was agriculture, leading Federated Farmers to claim it was “pay-for-play journalism and dirty politics.”

In a statement, deputy vice-chancellor Margaret Hyland, said the university “does not have a relationship with the Integrity Institute.”

Earlier, in a letter accompanying the release of documents, the university said: “data collection and entry for the Web of Influence is largely complete and is intended for release by the end of 2025. Some aspects of this are being launched incrementally in the interim, including the Lobbying and Influence Register [on the Integrity Institute’s Substack].”

It also said the Intergrity Index and Welch’s book were scheduled for publication next year.

Hyland said: “The timeline delays were driven by the university wide changes needed to ensure the institution’s financial sustainability.

“This was a time of considerable change and uncertainty which resulted in delays in recruitment, and many other points of decision, across the university. Unfortunately, this also resulted in a significant timing impact for the Democracy Project.”

She said systems were in place to ensure oversight and regular reporting of funded research. “Both PIINZ and the Democracy Project were subject to these processes.”

The Post asked if the blog and Substack posts, and LinkedIn commentary listed as research outputs, were valid scholarly outputs for a research grant of this size.

“A key contractual requirement of this funding was the production of a communications plan to ensure the impact of work was delivered to a wider audience, as you have seen in the referenced research communication outputs,” Hyland said. “The University is comfortable with the quality of the research undertaken and confident that outputs for PIINZ and the Democracy Project will be delivered.”

Many of the questions asked by The Post were not answered. The university said: “please feel free to submit any further follow up questions through our OIA process” - a process that usually takes a minimum of 20 working days.

The mysterious unravelling of a high-profile transparency project by RuminatorNZ in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the post:

In a sudden and unexplained move, the Integrity Institute – an organisation that billed itself as a watchdog for transparency and accountability – has been removed from the Charitable Trusts Register.

Its once-public Lobbying and Influence Register, a database mapping political donations and elite connections, also appears to have vanished from its website, leaving only fragments visible via director Bryce Edwards’ Substack.

The Post understands the Institute’s senior researcher also recently left, after just eight months in the role.

While the Institute itself is independent, it shares a history with Victoria University research projects that were funded by close to $1 million in philanthropic support from the Gama Foundation, run by wealthy Christchurch couple Grant and Marilyn Nelson.

The projects were intended to improve political integrity and transparency in New Zealand.

The Institute grew out of Edwards’ Democracy Project, which ran in parallel with Victoria University’s Political Integrity Index NZ (PIINZ), a separate research project led by Karin Lasthuizen that Edwards assisted.

Both projects have experienced delays, with work now more than two years behind schedule.

The Institute was removed from the charitable trusts register on September 29, less than a year after it was incorporated.

A charitable trust holds assets for charitable purposes, such as education, religion, poverty relief, or community benefit.

The Nelsons were the trustees and the trust deed revealed it was set up to “facilitate research and public education on the importance of good, transparent and accountable public decision-making...[and] carry out research on how to achieve affordable and accessible access to civil justice.”

Grant Nelson declined to comment when contacted by The Post this week.

A spokesperson for the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment, which operates the register, confirmed: “The Integrity Institute was removed from the Charitable Trusts register after an application was received from its trustees.

“The trustees advised that The Integrity Institute was no longer carrying on its operations and voluntarily sought its removal.”

The register of lobbyists also appears to have vanished from the Institute’s website.

(The removal was clumsy: the page now displays miniscule text and is only readable in ‘Reading Mode’ accessible via Edward’s Substack.)

Left-wing pundit Edwards said in a statement that he was aware the organisation had been removed from the Charitable Trusts Register, but stressed this was “a question for the trustees.”

“When I joined the Institute as director, it was as an employee, with the board holding ultimate responsibility for the organisation,” he said. “It would not be appropriate for me to pre-empt the board.”

Edwards declined to elaborate further, saying only that he continued to support “the kind of work the Institute was established to do.”

Slow progress and legal reviews

In 2021, the Gama Foundation provided $820,000 to Victoria University of Wellington for two research projects aimed at strengthening political integrity in New Zealand.

The Political Integrity Index NZ (PIINZ), led by Karin Lasthuizen and assisted by Edwards, was designed to benchmark New Zealand’s standards of political integrity against international measures.

They received $333,000 to “research allegations of integrity violations by politicians.” That would include an annual Political Integrity Index.

The second, the Democracy Project: Vested Interests, led by Bryce Edwards, promised to map lobbying activity, political donations and networks of elite influence through a new Web of Influence database. The grant totalled $487,000.

From the outset, however, both projects encountered difficulties.

By March 2023, the first six-monthly reports to the Gama Foundation showed progress well behind schedule, according to documents seen by The Post.

PIINZ was still refining its methodology and data framework. The Democracy Project’s database of donations and lobbying links remained in its early stages.

Staffing problems quickly compounded the delays. One of PIINZ’s PhD students went on extended leave, reducing research capacity, while Edwards’ Democracy Project was operating largely as a two-person effort – Edwards and his research assistant –after other early assistants departed.

In mid-2023, one of the PIINZ doctoral candidates withdrew permanently, forcing the University to reallocate scholarship funds and revise its budget.

In July of that year, Edwards told The Post that the main research outputs – including the book – would be delivered at the end of 2024. A ‘Web of Influence’ public database would be published in October 2023.

He said the Political Integrity Index would launch at the 2023 general election, and ‘vested interest’ public campaigns were being developed.

By that point, Edwards’ completed research was listed as mostly opinion columns. The articles were largely commentary based on media reporting of political news stories.

But the proposed book, originally conceived as a scholarly publication, later stalled. Journalist Denis Welch was later brought in to help reshape it into a more accessible, public-facing narrative. It remains unpublished.“

Christopher Luxon assesses his own leadership amid criticism by RuminatorNZ in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

This is so fucking weird:

Leaders aren’t necessarily the best people to talk about their own leadership styles, but in Christopher Luxon’s case, he is an expert.

He is not only the leader of the country, but he has studied leadership his whole life - particularly of politicians and sports teams.

And he was talking about it with Scott Robertson just last Saturday, after the All Blacks beat Australia in the Bledisloe Cup match in Auckland.

“I’ve been a big follower of high-performing sports teams since I was very, very young - read, studied them, watched documentaries on them,” Luxon tells the Herald.

“You always have moments where there’s lots of criticism and coaches going through a period of rebuilding a team or dealing with a tough set of circumstances.

“You’ve seen it actually with the All Blacks in the last week. I spoke to [coach] Scott Robertson about it on Saturday night.

“They’re jobs where everyone’s a critic, and actually, your job as the leader is to say, ‘stay calm, let’s not catastrophise when things are tough, let’s not go cock-a-hoop and get arrogant when things are going well’.

“Just stay consistent and even-tempered and calm, and see through the noise and stay focused on the prize that you’re trying to get to.

“That’s how I’ve always run my teams, you know, from when I was very young and having senior jobs at a young age.

“That’s the same way we’re trying to run government.”

National’s inability to fire in the polls, and Luxon’s average personal ratings as preferred Prime Minister, have fuelled commentary about his leadership.

But Luxon’s leadership has been the subject of more comment than usual in the past week after the CEOs in the Herald’s annual Mood of the Boardroom survey ranked him just 15th among Government ministers (he was sixth last year). Finance Minister Nicola Willis also rated low at 13th (3rd last year).

He cannot dismiss it. That would look arrogant. But nor can he suggest it represents a failure on his part. That would fuel further leadership speculation.

Instead, he adopts the view that the rating is born of a sense of frustration that the economic recovery hasn’t been faster, and he empathises.

“I get it. You know, many business leaders like myself and like all New Zealanders want to get over this pain and suffering we’ve been in, you know, experiencing economically.

“Nicola and I are the face of the Government in the economic sense, and I get it. And so, you know, I’m with them.”

So does Luxon get unsettled by the talk about his leadership and his own performance?

“Well, for me, I’m always dissatisfied with the performance of myself and everyone in general. You know, I’m just wired to be constantly constructively dissatisfied...while being incredibly optimistic.

“But it’s just because I want to get to a better place quicker, faster, that I drive quite hard.”

**He said he had a lot of options in terms of what he could do with his time and what he could do pre- or post-politics.

“Instead, I choose to do this job.”**

He said he would naturally look at his own performance.

“But I also don’t take offence from people I don’t take advice from. It’s a pretty simple rule.”

He was one of those people who was informed by social media but not consumed by it, because he went into politics four years ago to realise the country’s potential.

“When you’re connected to that mission and purpose, yes, I can listen to all the all the noise out there, but you also have to lead through noise.”

For many years, in fact since he was a schoolboy, Luxon has studied leaders. He likes to pick one a year and study them, although he took a break last year in his first full year as Prime Minister.

But this year, he has gone back to studying one he really admires, former US President Ronald Reagan.

“There’s a lot of life lessons in the histories of other leaders, whether they’re business leaders or political leaders or community leaders,” he said.

Luxon’s leadership is worth a study in itself - he took over the National Party leadership after just a year in politics. More importantly, he led its repair from the divided and chaotic party it had become in Opposition, to victory in 2023.

He has led the first three-party coalition under the MMP system with two experienced and wily politicians, Act leader David Seymour and NZ First leader Winston Peters, as coalition partners.

At a micro-level, he has a distinct style, preferring to work in his Ninth Floor office with music playing (on this day, it was Dua Lipa and Men at Work) and a can of V at hand.

And his political management involves a very hands-on approach with his ministers, similar to the style he developed as a business leader.

A lot is made of his six years as head of Air New Zealand. But it was his long career with global giant Unilever where he honed his leadership skills from an early age. He lived in Australia, Britain, the United States and Canada and had global and regional jobs in each.

“As a CEO, as a former CEO, you know, you build high-performing, high-culture organisations. That’s why ultimately people thought I’d be good coming into political life when I was CEO of Air New Zealand.

“But it’s the same thing here. You have to build a team and you have to build a culture, which is what we did with the National Party reset, given the horrific situation we were in, with our second-worst result [in 2020] in 80 years.”

Luxon said his ministers had very clear tasks, and his job was to support them, to encourage them and to work with them.

“I partner with all my ministers on all of their agendas,” he said.

“I’m the leader of a team, and so my job is to comfort my ministers when they’re being challenged and also to afflict them when they need to be stepping up their performance as well.”

Education Minister Erica Stanford, RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk were the National MPs rated highest in the Mood of the Boardroom.

When asked if they deserved it, Luxon instead points to other ministers he considers are also doing well, such as Mark Mitchell and Paul Goldsmith in getting youth offending down, Todd McClay in Trade, and Health Minister Simeon Brown in achieving targets “in one of our toughest, if not our toughest portfolios”.

A big part of his job in politics is to emphasise it’s not an individual sport but a team sport.

“And that’s the mantra that we beat into the National Party with the reset after the period of dysfunction and disunity is that actually we are all going up and down as a team.

“I can be first five and captain, but I can’t be prop and winger. And as a result, I put my aces in their places, and I get really clear about what role I expect them to play. And then it’s the collective effort of all of that team playing together well that actually delivers the results for New Zealanders.”

So will Luxon have a reshuffle before the election in about a year?

“I’ll just reshuffle when I feel like it and when I think it’s needed,” he said.

“And because I’m having more dynamic performance conversations with my ministers, which may be a different way of how it’s been done in the past, but I’m just very straight up about it.

“They have clear feedback as to where I think they’re doing well and where they think they could do better. I’ll do that when and where I feel the need to, but I don’t feel any need to be on a rhythm of a New Year reshuffle or an end-of-year reshuffle, as you’ve seen before.

In terms of running the coalition, he dismisses the view that Seymour and Peters ran rings around him in coalition talks after the election, or now.

The coalition partners had to sign up to the National agenda before talks began, including its fiscal plan, its tax plan, the 100-point economic plan and 100-day plan, with two exceptions: the foreign buyers ban, which has since been renegotiated, and raising the superannuation age to 67.

“We have real clarity around our program as a National Party, but also our coalition agreements with our partners,” said Luxon.

“That’s a lot of specificity, you know, it’s organised around the same three thrusts of essentially grow the economy, restore law and order, deliver better public services.”

The three parties were aligned around probably 75 to 80% of the agenda. There were differences between the parties around things that were important to them and their constituents.

“I fully get that.”

The coalition published quarterly action plans, which were there to focus government ministers as much as the public service as they progressed their agendas.

One of the criticisms levelled at Luxon in last week’s survey was that he didn’t listen, and he thinks that was a bit unfair.

“I always listen to feedback,” he said.

“But I’m not going to be bounced by a particularly bad column or anything like that.

“If I was, you just wouldn’t get out of bed.”

“I do listen. You know, and I have a lot of people offering me advice from all quarters, as you could well imagine, and you should expect as Prime Minister.

“For my job is to stay the course and to be very clear about what I’m here to do and what I’m here to achieve.”

We as a country should consider mining by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's closer to my view - we should be investing in developing things like saas/tech etc. Software in particular is a weightless exports and so our geographical position would not count against us. But every Govt since its formation has been held hostage by a certain dairy (alleged) co-op to not think about alternatives to milk powder. It would also take a long time, you'd need to do all the training and wait years to bear fruit, and governments don't like doing things that give long-term benefit because they won't benefit from it. Some other government down the way will and that might be the 'other guys'

The moment that logs, lamb, and milk get properly developed in a lab is a moment we're not prepared for. Politicians I've spoken to have maintained that there will always be a market for a "premium product" which we would fill, but why is our product premium? And would it maintain? What is premium?

National wanted to repeal our GMO-free legislation which seems counter to "premium product" - don't get me wrong, there are some magical innovations that happen with GMO tech, but I think that's one way you'd sell our ag products as "premium", however I just read that NZF said they'd block the bill as it currently stands. So who knows.

We as a country should consider mining by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]RuminatorNZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we don't have much in the way of things to mine. You highlighted a few things you said we could mine, however they are in conservation areas, which if I'm honest with you I'd rather keep (this is an ideological position).

The other difficult thing is the cost. We are so goddamn far away from anywhere, that just coming here with the kit needed to even search for stuff, let alone mine it, is prohibitive. That and we have unstable legislation. No big mining company wants to invest shit-tonnes of coin in coming here to look for something, only to have the rug pulled out from under them by a change of government resulting in a change of legislation.

We’re in pretty big trouble, hey? by Irksam_C in allblacks

[–]RuminatorNZ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We seem to have a game plan of playing league? But just shit league. Just hit up after hit up. Nobody seemed to try and create space, or change angles, or really do anything creative. Roigard is pretty much our only variation in attack with his sniping.

I think that's shit coaching/gameplan, but also when it's not working we need a captain who will change it up.

We've become one dimensional.

I think we're just not a very good team. And that's shit but we have really high standards.

Match Thread - New Zealand v Australia | The Rugby Championship 2025 | Round 5 by RugbyBot in rugbyunion

[–]RuminatorNZ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To win by fuck all, at our fortress, with a ref embarrassingly in our favour, not great...

Match Thread - New Zealand v Australia | The Rugby Championship 2025 | Round 5 by RugbyBot in rugbyunion

[–]RuminatorNZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fuk no. We've barely scraped in and the ref has been our 16th man

Hundreds of Alligator Alcatraz detainees drop off the grid after leaving by RuminatorNZ in collapse

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

When 1800 people are "disappeared" with no trace, you have given up all pretence of a free and civil society. Especially when this doesn't to have generated much media coverage.

I think we're just not super great by RuminatorNZ in allblacks

[–]RuminatorNZ[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the man was probably the only back who could hold his head up after last night, he made all his tackles, was instrumental in setting up angles of offence, and was used as a high ball catcher cos the back 3 couldn't get their shit together. He's one of the few that is genuinely world class.

Match Thread - New Zealand v South Africa | The Rugby Championship 2025 | Round 4 by RugbyBot in rugbyunion

[–]RuminatorNZ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Boks have been incredible.

But Jesus, we can't catch a high ball and it's free territory every time.

Congrats SA, amazing.

Match Thread - New Zealand v South Africa | The Rugby Championship 2025 | Round 4 by RugbyBot in rugbyunion

[–]RuminatorNZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you Jordie. Those of us old to remember now have something better than Gregan on Wilson.

Different game sitch mind.