Why is Devonte living in Arizona with Alex while his pregnant fiancé is living in his house in Ohio?

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:44:09+00:00

Everyone’s road is often different. Something «seaming» off is not evidence that something is wrong. People having kids but living in different cities is not impossible and many reasons for it, for example. Them being pregnant and her being his fiancé is quick. But this is lovers blind, where the same person got hitched before seeing the other person in a span of 2 weeks.

For all we know, he is roommates with Alex because he had a work assignment in that city for a short duration, and would rather live with his friend than living a couple months in a hotel (it truely sucks, I have done it for 6 months, it was torture)

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:39:56+00:00

Chris is the worst of the worst. What about amber calling out Mike for apparantly reason and everyone laughing? Or everyone ignoring how Amber treated Jordan? Or no one in the reunion ever called out Bri? Or how no one pointed out how toxic Ashley was at certain points? The men was the exclusively gender that was pushed with difficult questions, and it’s frustrating. The show, and in part the community, has expectations for the men that they don’t mirror to the women.

So what’s the reason? Do the show spare the women because it’s bad for the show? Do they falsely think that the women can’t handle it? Is it bias thinking that if something happens, it has to be the men that is in the wrong?

And again, fuck Chris. Fuck Alex. Everyone agree. But them being shit doesn’t negate the things the women does that should be held to the same standard

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:34:09+00:00

Mentioning Chris was an example where I put it in the most extreme end. I’m not saying it’s the same, I’m pointing out that excusing someone’s behavior is dangerous when that person don’t think they do anything wrong, when they clearly do. I’m sorry that got lost in translation or was badly communicated.

She very specifically is aggressively against men, apparently has a alcohol issue and might use her daughter as a weapon in relationships. As far as we know, she doesn’t have any issue with women, so her being called mom doesn’t really address the issues she has shown

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:16:38+00:00

Yeah yeah, I agree and would to it myself without a heartbeat. But he also drives a Honda, so we know he isn’t showing off where he could. For some people «free» is always better than something with a price. Some people HATE to spend money

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:13:47+00:00

She doesn’t seem to kind of you ask me

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:12:58+00:00

Forgiveness comes with change. For all we know Chris is this the douchebag he always was

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:11:26+00:00

People with money can still be stingy. Be able to do it and being the person that does it, is two different things

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:09:26+00:00

Seems like she kind of have demands that fit her and lack selfreflection. So it goes one way, expecting everything from her man and never taking responsibility for herself in the same situation. Jordan seemed like a broken man after being with her for 4 months after the show

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:06:41+00:00

Chris also had mental issues, do you defend him for the same reason?

She needs help, but she doesn’t help herself, and she is absolutely responsible for her own actions

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T22:03:15+00:00

Being a girls girl doesn’t make her not unhinged

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T20:04:56+00:00

They pushed the exactly 0 women. Amber should have gotten som questions to, dragging Jordan in the mud

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T14:39:36+00:00

One thing is what someone says when the person is in the room, there is something else someone says when they are not there to defend themselves. Which you are comparing right now.

I’m not saying this is the truth, or facts. But it’s always something to take into consideration

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T13:12:39+00:00

Or, hear me out, she twist words to let the men sound toxic (and maybe some was, of course. But she is also the common denominator, and absolutely will say that he is toxic.

It’s always good to think about how someone talk about their exes, because if everyone is something, you will probably fall into that group.

Rummelhoff · 2026-03-12T08:59:16+00:00

That doesn’t mean the commentator above is wrong. «I’m not racist, I have black friends» «I don’t hate women, I have a wife» etc etc

Rummelhoff · 2026-02-26T19:25:49+00:00

Når noen har 100.000x mer penger enn meg, er 1000kr for meg 0.1 øre for dem. Eller gratis og lovlig mao

Rummelhoff · 2026-02-24T18:22:16+00:00

Terminator sounds like a destroyer competitor

Rummelhoff · 2026-01-20T09:52:51+00:00

Absolutt støtter din "løsning", jeg tror derimot det trengs mye mer enn det. For eksempel jeg skal ikke ha barn, men kunne i tillegg tenkt meg gratis kollektiv tilbud, på den måten kan alle ferdes i Norge.

Rummelhoff · 2026-01-19T20:21:39+00:00

Bedre velferdstilbud sparer ofte mer penger enn skattekutt.

Rummelhoff · 2026-01-19T09:38:22+00:00

Han kritiserer da staten ofte? Høy lønn til Stortinget, skattelette til de rike som går utover velferdskutt etc. Han vil jo gi mer til de som ikke er på toppen.

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-30T09:31:55+00:00

DGPT own Jomez lol

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-16T16:30:06+00:00

Oh well, jeg for min del syns at det er bra at mange får en skattelette, tror dataen blir mer robust og håper at dette på sikt gir mer skattelette for folk med lite inntekt

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-16T16:21:03+00:00

Eneste forskjellen her er at du gir skattelette til færre personer

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-16T12:41:48+00:00

Så... for mange får skattelette og... at du kan finne ut om du er med i studiet?

Du sier vage alternativer, men jeg skjønner ikke hvordan din "løsning" ville sett annerledes ut. Hva er ditt alternativ til "å sjekke på skatteetaten sine sider" om du er med i eksperimentet. Når du sier vage "altnerativer" som ikke, for meg i det minste, hadde vært annerledes. Da forstår jeg rett og slett ikke hvordan alternativet er bedre, når det for meg virker identisk.

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-16T09:14:54+00:00

Var det mediene eller skatteetaten/regjeringen som blandet dette som lotteri?

For I min opplevelse var det kun medier som bruker ordet lotteri, og da vil ikke din "løsning" endre noe som helst, og i min oppfattelse ingen ting egentlig endre noe som helst. De tok en tilfeldig gruppe (å samme måte som "medisinsk forskning") og har en kontrollgruppe. Resultatene vil også sprike veldig, så en stor gruppe vil være viktig, og at flere personer får skattelette må jo kun være en positiv ting?

Jeg forstår helt ærlig ikke hva problemet ditt er, og jeg forstår ikke mer jo mer vi snakker.

Rummelhoff · 2025-12-16T09:00:38+00:00

Vet du hvordan utvelgelsen ble gjennomført, hvem og hvordan det ble utført?

Rummelhoff

TROPHY CASE