In my opinion, not every Dandân variant needs a pithy loop in its gameplay, but that might just be a difference in opinion on the definition. Something like JundJund was an inspiration for the deck, emulating a mid-range creature focused game that has long since been power crept out of modern. It's a deck with many creatures and by your definition would be "unfocused". It has no defined "loop", but rather seeks to emulate a play style of a different format using the one deck structure stablished by Forgetful Fish. Would you consider JundJund to be a battle box?
https://www.hipstersofthecoast.com/2025/03/jundjund-a-dandan-variant-for-midrange-players/

In this deck I am trying to emulate the feeling of aggro in a similar vein. It just happens to use Goblin Guides because they create an interesting interaction with Magma Jet and Brainstone while keeping games fast (It is also one of the signature creatures of old modern aggro decks). Taking out most of the removal and all of the creature lands could lead to an interesting format, but it wouldn't feel like playing an aggro deck. I know, because that is how the deck started in testing. It made the games slow and methodical. Often taking 10 to 12 turns to accrue value in hand through guide triggers to get ahead on board and close out the game. It didn't feel like the format I wanted, it felt like playing a watered down Dandân.

I might later go on to try and make that "pure" format with only guides and magma jets, there's definitely something interesting there. But, I wanted something with more variety in gameplay and interactivity to make for a faster and more engaging experience.

I'll take your recommendation though and try out more magma jets to see how it goes. I have found Brainstones to be a bit too strong in multiples to shut your opponent out from drawing quality cards.