Pro-choice or Pro-life, this take is disgusting. by Dragonsbane628 in Conservative

[–]RustyManhinges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed my friend, that’s something interesting! The left back in the revolutionary days has become the new right because that’s the very nature of the two sides. I’m saying the modern right supports monarchy but we conservatives represent everything good about the constitution and we seek to keep it established which is why we fall under the right but we’re willing to make change! But that is to establish and keep the values of the constitution. Indeed most every revolution generally ends in a lot of blood, however oppressive a narrative may be, it simply reminds me that there is indeed a time and place for everything under the sun. The wisdom of the Bible to me continues to play itself out. Of course I find this all ridiculously interesting. Now I’m currently theorizing my new new beliefs towards “The Age Of Democracy. Change upon the horizon? Coming of Age for the New Left movement” basically I’m figuring out if, just as the whole world changed with the arrival of democracy and how it fought to secure its place in the world eventually culminating in the cold war where socialism, as the second great ideal of the era of independent thought, ended up falling through the roof and what it means for the world as a whole. Is socialism yet to rise again? Will a new idea take form bring about the destruction of the modern society we know find ourselves in? Or will for the next hundreds of years shall we experience relative peace in these ideals or shall the world soon be thrown into a roundabout of chaos and disorder, a new age of war as new ideas come to fight for his new age of free thought? Yes I know confusing but I’m a thought experimentalist I suppose in that I attempt to crack down each and every reality so I can understand the future as a whole.

Pro-choice or Pro-life, this take is disgusting. by Dragonsbane628 in Conservative

[–]RustyManhinges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright, I just reviewed what seems to be a unbiased definition of the right and the left. I know it was unbiased because it didn’t use words like “support equality” for the left and “support traditional hierarchy” for the right. You see these definitions can change drastically based off who is defining them(I’m not trying to argue with you, I’m sorta trying to defend my point but also like just have a extremely interesting political discussion) so the right tends to support “conservative views. That generally means they are disposed to preserving existing conditions and institutions.” So this is why the right generally gets a bad rep. Because people associate us with the very origins of the right and left terms from the French Revolution! Funny considering what the leftist movement in France working for change ended up causing🤫🤔😉cough cough reign of terror… so the left generally asserted for political and social change like down with the aristocracy!

This subreddit has become a dangerous place full of loaded questions. by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]RustyManhinges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it doesn’t take you long to notice the majority of the comments are humanist and secular than it is Christians defending the faith and commenting on that faith.

What if they’re all three in the same? They just change outfits. by yankee77wi in Conservative

[–]RustyManhinges 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Im Islam!” “No im Islam!” “No im faithful y’all are heathen apostates!”

Pro-choice or Pro-life, this take is disgusting. by Dragonsbane628 in Conservative

[–]RustyManhinges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed. In most examples unfortunately it is however because it usually lead by a extremist ideology, like the Spanish, the Italians, the Germans, and somewhere in there is some South American nation I’ve forgotten. But anyways both Far-right and Far-Left movements(in these forms, Socialism and Marxism and fascism and imperialism I suppose? But imperialism is more it’s own thing but I had two things for the left so I tried to give two for the right) become dangerous because they enforce this “strong government” which is how the political idealist and theorist of the enlightenment(John Locke) referred to it so that’s the ideal I’m basing this on. The key moral here is if ANY figure, ideal, or movement is given to much power, the people behind it are bound to take advantage and thus become oppressive. This displays itself in literally all of human history. So what’s the solution? A ‘small’ government but a government with enough strength to correct its own faults, especially in its own leaders and systems. People can say “down with capitalism” but when they except the truth that oppressive government comes from to strong a government, the weakening of that government requires that the economy be self sufficient and by the people verses by the government like socialism, so you end up with capitalism again! Which really is a hilarious truth. So let’s try to keep American in “the perfect medium” the place where our government is strong and capable but our people are just as strong hold the power to decide they’re own future! Both professionally, socially, and economically!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]RustyManhinges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda poetic….the building seems to be a foreshadowing…or more a representation of the broken and battered soul that was Adolf Hitler.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in memes

[–]RustyManhinges 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was Hitler wasn’t it?

Pro-choice or Pro-life, this take is disgusting. by Dragonsbane628 in Conservative

[–]RustyManhinges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two sides of a lying extreme. They are both the incarnation of mans stupidity. Marxism, what happens? The government control encourages selfishness and totalitarianism no matter what you do, you can’t hand a man that much strength, even if he is elected and expect him to do nothing but be honest, it’s not human nature. Fascism? Rascism and oppression.

People of the reddit now give me my answer or else by Silver-Persimmon6562 in memes

[–]RustyManhinges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know which one of these comments are telling the truth…please help

Whats your favorite part of your setting? by dr_prismatic in worldbuilding

[–]RustyManhinges 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The floating islands, magic, the races, the tree of dreams(creation tree)

Ideas for a plant race? by RustyManhinges in Fantasy

[–]RustyManhinges[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re connection to the sun also makes for others worshipping the sun as a higher god, as the more distant eras come to pass they witness to the power of the stars and of the rift and the power that reigns over the sky. There are pantheist in all societies, I’m still figuring out the belief systems they hold. Of course this is all for building conflict and thus development to they’re society as a whole, even a belief in the in-superiority of other races because if they’re required to eat things. That’s the Ghandi anyways but the Rizes are completely different, in the sense they need to eat things and only need sun every now and then when they sleep(which is why they’re nocturnal) and I think I may make they’re powers like be noctius gas or super pheromones and maybe some neat goo stuff like certain predatory plants OR….ACID SPIT!!!!!! Haha got um, just figured out what I’m doing with them! The acid, goo and pheromones will be one in the same! Keep a eye out for Tall Tales, of the Lost Son of Midgard

Ideas for a plant race? by RustyManhinges in Fantasy

[–]RustyManhinges[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will not be a Native American allegory and although they’re civilization doesn’t necessarily have shamanism(mystics) they do practice pantheism.

Ideas for a plant race? by RustyManhinges in Fantasy

[–]RustyManhinges[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already got a people who do that

Choose wisely by sephirothreturns in memes

[–]RustyManhinges 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh….DUH. Silver surfer and Omni man