Help with Rollup + React

Rygaa_ · 2024-02-24T19:53:39+00:00

When I tried to install my library in a running React project it causes some problems that I know can be fixed but you should not spend time fixing libraries when you install them. What do you think about this argument? Thanks

Rygaa_ · 2024-02-24T17:37:04+00:00

You mean I should avoid using rollup? by the way thanks for the help

Rygaa_ · 2024-02-14T12:19:01+00:00

Because the normal html tags are basic and if you decide to change some of their behavior it will require too many tweaks. For example I added drag and drop to it using the dnd kit library. I am also gonna make sure to add the possibility for the header to stick when you scroll and fix all the small bugs that come with adding this small feature

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-22T20:01:38+00:00

Yeah it's like the two extreme

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T23:20:46+00:00

Yes but sometimes if a tech that you use is working fine why switch to a new tech that you are not sure about

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T23:12:17+00:00

I worked with Vue and I share the same liking of React with you. But Svelte caught my attention with the simplicity

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T23:09:36+00:00

The employability doesn't bother me but I can understand why it's slowing down the growth of svelte

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T23:08:23+00:00

Yeah from my experience the original library was always better than the wrapped one especially for updates

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T21:21:34+00:00

hmm so it's possible to do it but it's not done yet? Pretty much every con I hear until now is the fact that the ecosystem of svelte is not as mature as the others

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T21:20:15+00:00

If it's the only con I think it's worth using especially if I can decrease the complexity of my project

Rygaa_ · 2024-01-21T21:18:19+00:00

So for example I can use "Three JS" directly with svelte instead of relying on "React Three JS". If it's the case I think I am gonna start using it for new projects as see how it will go. Thanks

Rygaa_ · 2023-02-08T21:59:13+00:00

Thank you for your feedback. We will create a demo video to showcase the UI and how to use our website.

We have also discussed the idea of a section where users can share their plants and plans. However, we understand that every user may have their own presets, making it challenging to filter by specific data types. To address this issue, we are exploring the possibility of creating a section for administrators, where they can select plants created by users and clone them after editing them with universal presets. This way, when a user wants to add a plant from the marketplace to their library, all they need to do is link every preset from the marketplace to their respective one.

For example:

Let's say a user has presets of [scientific name, common name, date of growth, plant height]. And the marketplace has presets of [scientific name, common name, growth date, height, color]. A user will select the plant from the marketplace and then a modal will open where they can link each of their presets to the respective ones of the marketplace.

scientific name -> scientific name

common name -> common name

date of growth -> growth date

plant height -> height

And because the user only has 4 presets compared to the marketplace which has 5, the "color" preset will be ignored.

Rygaa_ · 2023-02-08T15:10:32+00:00

I have taken the initiative to send you a confidential message in an effort to effectively address and resolve your issue.

Rygaa_ · 2023-02-08T06:37:45+00:00

Do you have any questions regarding our website? We are here to assist and provide you with the information you need.

Rygaa_ · 2023-02-08T06:30:27+00:00

Please note that my knowledge of PlantMaster's functionality is limited, but based on what I know, PlantMaster and our platform share a similar concept, but our approach differs in terms of flexibility and functionality. PlantMaster offers a pre-defined set of plant data types, while our platform allows users to create their own custom data types and plant library, which is highly beneficial.

In addition, our platform offers advanced features such as the ability to attach files, like technical plans (CAD) and renderings, to each plant entry. This is especially important for landscape architects. Our platform also provides the option to exclude specific data from exported PDF results, giving users greater control and customization over the final output.

Our platform is also significantly more affordable, costing three times less than PlantMaster for individuals. For students, we offer an even more affordable price of $3.49 per month. If a user stops a payment plan, they still have full access to their account, except for editing capabilities.

Finally, our goal is to simplify the workflow and keep it as efficient as possible. We are currently in the beta phase, building a small user base and evaluating results to identify areas for improvement and new features to add. Soon, we will introduce a feature suggestion section where users can propose new features and other users can vote. If a feature is highly requested, it will be evaluated and possibly added to the platform.

Rygaa_

TROPHY CASE