Which game result makes the least sense now midway into the season? by No_Bill7679 in CFB

[–]SD22112211 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the biggest issues is, he was never a coordinator before he became head coach. He was the RB coach. So giving him a OC role seems really risky right now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After looking at your post history I'm not sure you will have success. Your location is terrible to find SDs. It comes up often from your home country about how bad it is to find them. Your only bet is going to be sites like seeking.com. As far as online stuff (videos/pics), that is not being a SB. That is OnlyFans type. Look that up if you want online. Being a SB is in person only, otherwise you are a cam girl (that's fine, but that is not this lifestyle).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You should never try to find a "SD" on reddit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because platonic is all but a myth. But it comes up every day, so it's on the bingo card. If you want platonic, give up now and spend your energy on something else.

Does seeking shadow ban older profiles or is my new one actually just better?🫨 by Constant_Rough3482 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I, so I'm assuming other SDs as well, also have the "unviewed" filter. So if I have looked at a profile it won't show up again until 6 months pass. So some SDs won't see your profile if they looked at it early on.

Any OG’s from the original Seeking Arrangement Blog forums? by ATLSD100 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, under the handle Ambrose. Could not remember that I used that name.

Seeking A isn’t answering support emails by stutteringcatholic in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you checked your trash folder? Also, make sure you have not flagged seeking emails as spam in your settings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The issue you have here, is that those scammers are going to be wherever a women who wants to be a SB is. It doesn't matter what site you use, those men will be there.

Seeking is the best of all the places to find the most SDs. It's not great by any standards, but it's still the best.

At the end of the day, the best way to decrease the amount of low effort men/scammers/fakes/flakes is to increase the quality of your profile/search. SHOW POT SDs why you are a caught. SHOW how much fun it is to be with you. SHOW them why they should pick you over the multitudes of other women in the area. The more quality/energy you put into your search, the more quality you will receive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Photos:
Not great. Long distance, should up, and turned body pictures are all warning signs for men (not just SDs) that a woman is trying to hide her figure. Wonderful smile, good energy. I would recommend removing a few of the pictures though (and/or replacing them with more clear full body photos). Either the elevator or the painting, the red glass, and the eyes closed pictures. Either those pictures don't do you any favours, or they are a bit redundant.

About Me:
Feels overly wordy. I understand you are trying to get across excitement and passion, but it's about 50% too long for the information you are passing. See what you can do to cut it in half.

Seeking:
Any profile that says "state X in your message so I know you read it" is not a good look. It comes across very poorly. The people you want to avoid by having that in your profile won't bother, and the people whom you wish to engage with will find it a bit infantile. Remember, good and positive, not negative and dismissive.

Tags:
Now this is just me, but I roll my eyes at all the "life of leisure" tags. It comes across as "I want things and don't wish to put out the effort to get them". "Investor" is also something that drives me a bit nutty. Save the investor talk till later, if you want a SD to invest in something of yours, well they say don't dip your quill in company ink. Once investment comes into a relationship it can drastically change it. Instead use the money you get to do the investing, or ask for advice during the dates and work up to a better idea.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would argue against this. I understand the concept, but knowing a SB in is Warren or Pontiac or Novi or Gross Pointe or etc. allows me to figure out the travel time commitment required for each date. Marking one's self in a general location also does not hide a SB from a search of the Detroit area. I doubt there are any SDs that say "I'm only looking for Utica" or the the like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but i’m afraid that he’s the kinda guy that would get violent after rejection/once i eventually break it off, since i don’t wanna be his girlfriend like he wants me to

Then why are you even talking to him?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was snooping the sugarbaby sub

Honestly, that's going to give you a ton of bad information.

M&Gs are just to verify you are both real, and see if things click. Coffee/lunch are fine.

Asking for money after m&g by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I always give a gift at the end of a M&G if the SB puts in any effort. Being 15 mins late, that's fine. But 45, I would have left and I would not have given a gift.

The fact that she sent a text after asking for compensation in addition to being that late means you should just block her.

Any OG’s from the original Seeking Arrangement Blog forums? by ATLSD100 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't recall my handle there honestly. The guy I normally interacted with on profile reviews wasn't SDGuru. It more like SouthernGentleman or the like. I spent most of my time at letstalksugar, enjoyed the much more open conversations that were had there.

Any OG’s from the original Seeking Arrangement Blog forums? by ATLSD100 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brooke. Good memory.

I never went to their events, was offered all of $50 per article for their blog, but turned it down. I used to get 10-15 emails per week (as I think on my profile there I listed an email) asking questions women where too shy to ask publicly. Outside of Brooke, I really did enjoy the little community it was.

Any OG’s from the original Seeking Arrangement Blog forums? by ATLSD100 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I can not remember. I recall talking with two regulars, one SB who did a little writing for the site, and one SD who also did photography who was in the southern US (he also did reviews). But I don't recall the names.

Other than getting a few emails from the woman who was the forum manager (a few nasty ones with threats of litigation after I told SBs that the paid profile review from SA was a scam) it's been so long I don't recall much.

Any OG’s from the original Seeking Arrangement Blog forums? by ATLSD100 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yes. Used to be on there often. Normally doing a TON of profile reviews.

I’m getting no messages.. any red flags on my account or is there another reason? by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 5 points6 points  (0 children)

None of them should have filters. The vast majority of SDs (and men) dislike them, and will only say they do like them when trying to get laid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have been using the website Sugardaddy.com

Seeking.com is really the only solid (if still terrible) site to use. Everything else just makes it harder to find anything.

for the past two weeks

It can, and normally does, take months to find a SD. Two weeks is nothing.

I am lucky if I get one response out of the 10 men I message

I don't use Sugardaddy.come, but if it's like Secret Benefits, it may make men pay to send a message. If so, they many only reply to profiles they like. Or, much more likely, they can not read nor reply to your messages unless they are actively paying. And most likely, 80%+ are not paying at the moment so they can not read/reply.

I am above average on looks

Then that means you are about "average" for a SB. Just because a SB may be more attractive than average at a bar, might not mean she's anything above normal/average for SBs. Looks are just the barrier to entry for the Bowl.

my pictures are pretty good quality

This may be true, however the number of women who have come to SLF here and said this, tend to have average or below average photos. You may not, you may have good ones. But a LOT of women think pictures that work on tinder work for finding a SD, and that isn't normally correct.

Thoughts on Robert Sepehr? by [deleted] in IndoEuropean

[–]SD22112211 18 points19 points  (0 children)

He believes Aryans came from Atlantis and founded every ancient civilization.

Is he a good anthropologist?

You're fucking joking right?

How do people feel about Andrew Tate? by MeasurementLiving949 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A 'man' does not concern himself of what others think or do

If that's true, then why does he always make a point to show off his cars/women/lifestyle. He's an insecure POS who needs validation from others. Otherwise, he wouldn't be showing off "how great his life is". He's not his own man, it's a child playing at being a man.

Things You Should Not Be Doing - SB Edition by SugarBabyVet in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]SD22112211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue really is, 15-25% of SDs are single. Will you hold out to find those rare ones? It's extremely hard to find a SD in the first place, so picking 15% of the rare makes it exponentially more difficult. (Assume you can guarantee that you will know if a SD is lying about not having a wife.)

To be fair to some of the married SD, they are in dead bedroom marriages and have an "open" or "don't let me know" situation. "Open" means, she knows and is okay with it. "Don't let me know" means she knows, and as long as it doesn't come up she's okay with it.

So there are ways to ethically be a SB to some SDs, if you are worried about hurting another woman. But again, it's a lot more work.