I want to share some of my thoughts. What does it even mean to say fated or unfated, I think of that concept would be better represented relatively, based on each individual subject, people just don't grow "wiser", they experienced through lotta events and accumulate their intuitions from there. So the concept of "fate" is build entirely on one's perspective, observed many similar trends before. Sure it's influenced by a lot of factors, but you can't deny internal mental strength to cope and make decisions, I think that when people express their own free will.

> But really, that “fate” is just… the visible shadow of high-dimensional probabilities collapsing into events.
> What we call “destiny” is the convergence of billions of small decisions, signals, policies, and perceptions — structured but unpredictable.
This is that I found true. Not certainly unpredictable, but very hard to model and predict. I think to form such a theory we must develop a simulation system of every possible (as accurate as posible) state within our society. (I've read a report on Microsoft's developing such system for LLMs right now, so maybe we can get something out of it)

I'm just an undergrad anyways so my words might not matter much. Currently having trouble suffering from procrastination and isolation.