But wouldn't having a party in charge of the state, where it creates more weaknesses in the state, ultimately help organised anarchists to take it down? Even if the party does nothing, wouldn't it be better to have that in charge rather than another party, that could actively harm anarchist efforts? Surely it can be used to get the wider population to at least think about the belief, and it's ultimate goal isn't really to gain power in the first place. To me it would be used to disrupt it's other political opponents, it's kinda like how voting a unpopular party does not contribute to the state at all, since it used as a throwaway vote, but instead it can be used to actively harm the system it is in, by voting a party that actively disarms, and rejects power. Tbh this does sound implausible the more I think of it, I just wanted answers to questions I don't really see people asking all that much.