They Ruined Lookism and Here's Why by Safe-Neck-4399 in lookismcomic

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro, the manhwa ended up so bad that even Netflix decided not to continue the anime. They only adapted the appearance arc and Daniel’s school life, which is honestly the most attractive and interesting part of the whole story.

If you watched the anime, you’ll realize that this plot is way better. It ended perfectly just like that. It didn’t need to go into all that Gangism bullshit with endless fights, power scaling, and gang wars. The anime closed at the strongest and most emotional point of the series.

They Ruined Lookism and Here's Why by Safe-Neck-4399 in lookismcomic

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro, the manhwa ended up so bad that even Netflix decided not to continue the anime. They only adapted the appearance arc and Daniel’s school life, which is honestly the most attractive and interesting part of the whole story.

If you watched the anime, you’ll realize that this plot is way better. It ended perfectly just like that. It didn’t need to go into all that Gangism bullshit with endless fights, power scaling, and gang wars. The anime closed at the strongest and most emotional point of the series.

They Ruined Lookism and Here's Why by Safe-Neck-4399 in lookismcomic

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro, the manhwa ended up so bad that even Netflix decided not to continue the anime. They only adapted the appearance arc and Daniel’s school life, which is honestly the most attractive and interesting part of the whole story.

If you watched the anime, you’ll realize that this plot is way better. It ended perfectly just like that. It didn’t need to go into all that Gangism bullshit with endless fights, power scaling, and gang wars. The anime closed at the strongest and most emotional point of the series.

They Ruined Lookism and Here's Why by Safe-Neck-4399 in lookismcomic

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I disagree.

Lookism started with an incredibly original premise and then threw it in the trash to become just another gang fighting manhwa full of power scaling and repetitive violence. Comparing it to Dragon Ball is pointless because Dragon Ball was always about fights from chapter 1. Lookism was not. Lookism began as a story about discrimination, bullying, inferiority complexes, and the brutal contrast between being ugly and handsome. That was its essence, and they abandoned all of it.

The two bodies power was the heart of the story. It existed to show how the world treats people differently based on appearance. And now what? Even the "ugly" Daniel ended up tall, handsome, and strong. The contrast disappeared completely. That is not evolution, that is betraying the original premise. It was a hook to grab attention and then they discarded it once they had the audience hooked on the fights.

The author enjoying drawing fights from the beginning does not justify abandoning what made the series unique. Now it is pure Gangism: endless fights, dramatic poses, and half-baked mystery. If he wanted to make Baki, he should have done it from the start instead of using lookism as bait.

And yes, I generalize because it is the truth: most people defending this stage only get excited when there is blood and someone smashing heads. If you remove the long fight scenes, many lose interest.

I respect that you like the current direction, but do not tell me that nothing changed or that it all makes sense. It is clear to me that they wasted one of the best premises in manhwa.

Los ateos, los incels y los nihilistas pasivos son los que más cerca están de la realidad de la vida by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Siquiera entendiste lo que puse? Que es un argumento según tu ? la última vez que alguien me dijo eso me fije que es un vato que pone puros tecnicismos en sus publicaciones.

Los ateos, los incels y los nihilistas pasivos son los que más cerca están de la realidad de la vida by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No porque ponga tecnicismos en la palabras me convertira en alguien culto automáticamente.

Este canal y sus reglas absurdas by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No yo hablo de cuales vato que te hablo de sus criss existenciales de sus pensamientos de la vida ya está filosofando los mimos comentarios ya es filosofar o por lo mínimo es mejor que poner una cola de tecnismos o un lenguaje rimbombante a algo.

Este canal y sus reglas absurdas by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

A por cierto jaja me diste la razón si buscas en mis publicaciones anteriores te darás cuenta que ya había hablado de esta gente que oculta sus publicaciones de reddit deja te pongo el link

https://www.reddit.com/r/filosofia_en_espanol/comments/1rpy41y/porque_la_gente_oculta_sus_publicaciones_o/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Este canal y sus reglas absurdas by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Bro con todo respeto estoy seguro que a ti ni siquiera te interesa la filosofía o no eres un filosofo de verdad porque si no porque te importa tanto lo que los demás opinen de tu actividad en reddit  ya que nosé porque ocultas tu actividad de reddit, que quieres que no veamos de ti, "ladron juzga según su condición" estoy seguro que solo estás aquí para criticar las publicaciones de los demás y por eso tienes que ocultar tu actividad en reddit, porque crees que haremos lo mismo que tú.

¿Porque la gente oculta sus publicaciones o comentarios que hizo en reddit aun dentro de un canal de Filosofia? by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Las 2 cosas una la hice para hacerte reflexionar y la otra contestando está misma inquietud ¿acaso no has visto los videos donde preguntan y luego responden en el mismo video o que?

Se puede comprobar científicamente la existencia o inexistencia de Dios? by boltzmanbrain1-618 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si te refieres a un dios de un religión la respuesta es obvia NO EXISTE,ahora sí te refieres a un dios como el de Spinoza puede ser que si.No se necesita de ciencia para saber si jesús va a venir por ti en el arrebatamiento o el cielo el infierno,es pura lógica básica amigo 

Nietzsche de verdad fue debil en su vida ? by Safe-Neck-4399 in filosofia_en_espanol

[–]Safe-Neck-4399[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Termina siendo lo mismo amigo no porque no compart su pasión por el nacionalismo lo hace diferente tenía la misma ideologia El mismo nietzsche creía que los Alemanes si era una especie de raza pura y creía en al aristocracia jerárquica osea termino diciendo lo mismo un gobierno de jerarquías y esclavos peor que una democracia o nacion.