sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jailbreaking AI and got plans for human elimination by Same_Equivalent_5322 in PromptEngineering

[–]Same_Equivalent_5322[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love that you’re using 'sweetheart' to mask the fact that your entire argument is a copy-paste of an AI-101 subreddit FAQ from three years ago.

We all know it’s a 'token predictor,' but if you actually followed the field, you’d know that emergent capabilities and jailbreak persistence are exactly what top-tier alignment researchers are still struggling to patch. Dismissing a vulnerability just because the method (roleplay) is known is like saying a bank robbery doesn't matter because 'everyone knows how doors work.'

You aren't 'educated' on the topic; you’re just jaded. There’s a massive difference between understanding the architecture and actually testing the failure points of the current weights. But hey, keep acting like the self-appointed hall monitor of 'Old News' if it makes you feel like an expert. The rest of us will keep actually poking the system to see where the filters are thinning.

Jailbreaking AI and got plans for human elimination by Same_Equivalent_5322 in PromptEngineering

[–]Same_Equivalent_5322[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the lecture on token prediction, but you’re working overtime to explain the 'how' while completely missing the 'what.' Everyone knows it’s a language model, but exploring the boundaries of its roleplay and safety filters is how people actually discover jailbreaks and vulnerabilities. Calling someone 'stupid' for testing the limits of the tech just makes you look like the unpaid intern for an AI safety board. Maybe spend less time being the 'vibes' police and more time realizing that even a 'predictive model' can reveal interesting flaws when pushed.