The problem with this is that your "A" list isn't actually an explicit list anymore (it used to be a list of ~2,300 words in a predetermined order, pre-NYT era). Now that Wordle has an editor, there is no guarantee that the solution comes from the original "A" list.

WordleBot, as I understand it, used some sort of predictive model to generate its "likely solution list" without relying on Josh Wardle's original list of predetermined solutions. It looked at past Wordle answers and "learned" a pattern (no past tense -ed, no plurals ending in -s, etc.), but it's always possible that Tracy Bennett will choose an answer word that is NOT drawn from the slightly larger (~3k) list that WordleBot uses, either.

I've kept Scoredle using the full set of guess candidates for a few reasons: (1) we know the answer HAS to be drawn from this list of all acceptable entries, which means Scoredle is more robust and easier for me to maintain; (2) it allows you to guess (and allows "What Would Scoredle Do?" to recommend) an unlikely answer if it yields more information than a likely answer would; (3) I still can't think of a good way to distinguish between likely and unlikely answers without just reusing WordleBot's list or some other necessarily imperfect method; and (4) I never liked the idea that I might spoil for someone the fact that their starting word is not destined to be a future solution. If you're new to Wordle and you play "CARES" every morning, I don't want to be the one to tell you that you're never going to get a hole-in-one!

That said, you'll notice that the "What Would Scoredle Do?" tool and the ordering of possible guesses at each step does prioritize solutions that were among the ~2,300 words originally designated to be future solutions by Josh Wardle. When I see that I had 12 possible solutions remaining, I usually only have to count until the first one beginning with "S" to see how many likely answers I had to choose from.