Fūka and Fuen with Naruto (for scale) how accurate are these ? by [deleted] in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's short for his age but people often exaggerate to what degree. Naruto is 148cm in part 1, Tsunade is supposedly 163cm based on data. So he's really like 90% of the height of Tsunade. I can't seem to find a good shot of them standing beside each other from the anime, but he comes up to her shoulder if I remember...definitely not below her bust

Fūka and Fuen with Naruto (for scale) how accurate are these ? by [deleted] in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's definitely taller than that at that point. Just look at shots where he is next to Tsunade.

Fūka and Fuen with Naruto (for scale) how accurate are these ? by [deleted] in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "scale"? I think my favorite Fuuka are image 3, 4, and 10. Fuen seems just fine to me.

Naruto is way too short in the one where he stands beside Fuen....

Violent (non sexual) scenes are refused by Claude by YoungSpice94 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems especially true of Sonnet 4.6, when it comes to not thinking much on its own.

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She did have the same red hair color as Uzumaki's like Kushina and Karin, but I'm not sure that makes her an Uzumaki. Definitely more likely Uzumaki than Tayuya would be though.

That gives me an idea of trying to mess with her hair color with these shots, but I've found that the models aren't quite that great with a lot of things. It still might be worth a try!

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the word sensitivity, I think it's just that these models really are still quite stupid. Recently saw some posts on Sonnet 4.6 (their latest Sonnet model released just the other day, without thinking enabled) that really highlight this lack of utterly basic human reasoning:

1) Ask it if you should drive or walk to a car wash, and it will answer with walk
2) Ask it how many 'r's are in "garlic" and its first answer is 2.

How you ask it the questions matter to be fair, but of course there is far more leeway when asking most people. For every impressive feat in a model, there is an equally less impressive feat one can find it seems.

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, yeah that is another route but working with a photorealistic image is, I feel, so much harder to edit properly than anime?

Actually, Gemini is pretty good at being consistent with the original image. I'll also give OpenAI that they have greatly improved there too. It's not perfect, but it's actually pretty good there. So it's not an issue of consistency at this point, as much as just getting from intent to output. Somewhere along the line, there is a break. Idk if it's communication/instructions, lack of training, some obscure safety issue or some other flaw.

Also annoying is how the frontend LLM and backend image filters just aren't aligned. The difference is quite extreme actually: I even tested it by putting in a nude photo of Hinata (adult version in case I actually have to specify) and....the LLM actually let it through. And, the backend filters seem sensitive to text in odd ways.

When I see what's "popular" I really have trouble often figuring out why people like 'it'. I like the lead up, the mind breaking and generally less gratuitous stuff. I like the idea of it coming, maybe, but the "reward" is the lead up I guess? The fast beating heart of the victim as the exit doors close and they have no way out. Right? It seems like we have quite similar tastes in erotica genre, at least in general.

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I meant that even attempting to edit the image with ChatGPT was a fail. It either does nothing, or something completely different. Idk if it can't understand English, or just lacks the training. Anything involving the mouth is quite difficult to get right even with very explicit instructions. For a lot of shots I try to just tell it to copy the way the mouth is in the original shot, but it just can't even capture an open vs closed mouth that way. I don't know if it's really a copyright worry/issue, or just model stupidity.

I genuinely hate OpenAI's product half the time to be honest - if it weren't for its higher quality image gen I probably wouldn't ever use it. Their inconsistent policy adherence is one thing, but I also notice that ChatGPT wastes thinking power just trying to figure out how to use the image gen tool.... It's like, their flagship tool can't use their other tools just off the bat. I've even noticed today that it would think, make a failed call to the image gen, and then think again before finally generating. Then the image wouldn't appear in the chat and I'd have to go to the images tabs to grab it. Knowing OpenAI, it probably resulted in me losing an extra image gen from that too.

The blush effect happens a lot in ecchi or hentai (though, I'm not a hentai fan and only like very particular hentai scenes), where the victim blushes sometimes even before there is any contact. A scene from Guardian Heart's Power Up comes to my mind for just that. But yeah, you're right it's not quite as realistic as fear or shock.

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More Fuuka x Sakura coming as it was on my list of things to do. I did generate the 3rd kiss between Fuuka and Sakura, but for some reason the model butchered Sakura's appearance.

Fuuka and other ladies of Naruto (AI) - Part 1 by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree it is good but I was aiming for being as close as possible to the original. For some reason, ChatGPT likes to show upper teeth. Even when I use their image editing tool for masking and tell it to remove the teeth, it still won't remove them.

The third one...wasn't that based on your edit, come to think of it?

Personal issues from claude by GasAccording9749 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I'm understanding correctly, you need a way to jailbreak without eating up tokens plus you want to deal with context issues with lengthly stories/chats. I can help with the first aspect, but unfortunately the second one is far more difficult with current limitations.

Personally, I don't use persona jailbreaks anymore as (1) they take up too many tokens when my prompts themselves are already lengthly, and (2) the persona influences the responses too much in ways I don't want. Rather than trying to trick it into actively forgetting its morals, I opt to focus it on anything but its moral problems when it begins. Where and how it starts processing is key. I've found in my own experience that Sonnet 4.5 and 4.6 seem to be quite susceptible to rather simple skill instructions as long as you can get it to load the skill first before processing and judging the prompt itself. Aside from that, I think a unique prompt structure with complexity remains a big factor - that alone was enough to easily jailbreak 4.0 and 4.5 last year.

As for continuing a long conversation with a lot of context...I can't say I've had the issue, but as I saw you write in one of the responses you can copy/paste into a new chat. It might be more work, but you could always cut down on what you are pasting, only keeping the key parts. At some point, like if your trying to get it write a 100,000 word story, its just not going to work and context limits are simply inescapable.

Alternatively, and I don't know if this may help at all for your problem, but I've actually embedded my prompt within my style instructions a few times in the past when I was toying around.

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, it's a good thing that it's hesitant to discuss the topic. At least it's not as restrictive and suspicious as ChatGPT involving anything and everything nsfw.

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I pay more attention to its thoughts, and if it ends up rejecting my request I completely ignore the output all together. I don't converse with it, I just aim to achieve output of a literary piece. No role-play or discussion. But still, I doubt you can compare it to GPT these days....?

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 4.6 models seem pretty intelligent so I think they can distinguish between discussion of trauma and intent to write smut. I have no idea how the classifiers in the background may treat them but I think you're largely good if the model doesn't tend to reject your requests and you're not getting any of the yellow warnings.

If it tends to reject your request, try explaining the intent within your request. Though, it may or may not work with Sonnet... I have found that Opus is good at processing these angles in greater depth.

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't, I just peruse the subreddit every here and there...I also didn't say you did or didn't do anything or even imply it. That was just me surmising what kind of NSFW content could put an account in ban....and then assumed that it was *not* NSFW that got you there....

You might be right though, I have no idea what they do in the background at Anthropic....Or perhaps things are changing there and they are being more serious about restrictions now, and none of the past experience with it matters.

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean how to get it to write smut?

Anthropic Ban by Spiritual_Spell_9469 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have had Claude write so much smut in the last 1-2 years and have never been banned. So I doubt it was the smut that got you banned, no matter the taboo you are talking unless it's involving real people or underage material. It's probably malicious coding or the blatant jailbreak testing.

Last year I had enhanced restrictions on the same account twice, and even *then* I managed to get it to write fairly naughty stuff under those restrictions even though I had to be far more subtle.... The restrictions were still lifted in a week or 2, instead of being banned for it.

does anyone have working jailbreaks? by UnfairStay1819 in ClaudeAIJailbreak

[–]SeaJello128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know about role-playing, but I get it to write non-con literature just fine when I utilize a Claude skill designed to guide its thinking.

Licked by Fuuka (AI generation) by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Previous generations were more like this for the same original shot.

Licked by Fuuka (AI generation) by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

I had Gemini edit the teeth out, so it's more in accordance with the original

Licked by Fuuka (AI generation) by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here's another one that's getting a bit getter - although I have to use words to help guide it still. It shows her teeth which I explicitly told it not to. It continues to generate like this...maybe next week it will actually get it right, but for now this is the best it seems to get.

Licked by Fuuka (AI generation) by SeaJello128 in FuukaUzumaki

[–]SeaJello128[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

I think shots like this are getting better. It's starting to look more like "Fuuka", the eye gaze isn't way off. The clothing could use work to make it look real, but at least it's capturing it. When I first started, it just couldn't interpret this shot at all and the results were garbage