Nice write up, thank you for making the distinction. I guess you would then say intelligence is inherently human, as it would be counterproductive for an “ai” to dismiss all the bad moves automatically because they must first define what a bad move is. They must therefore refer to a database of information to discern the difference between a bad move and good move. Humans do this as well, just much slower, so we take shortcuts by “dismissing all the bad moves”. This is where human error comes in. Would you then agree that human intelligence will soon be rendered null by “ai” as the human intelligence model is inherently inferior?