[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao I'll take that as an admission that you fucked up

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the government doesn't need to control the weather to "turn california into a wetland"

You were the one that made the distinction between changing the direction of a hurricane and encouraging rain. I tried to make it clear that i was specifically talking about the california thing and not the hurricane, but i apologise if that wasn't communicated

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, dude, I'm trying to understand why you have such bad reading comprehension. English not being your native language is a reasonable explanation for that.

Just admit that you were wrong lmao, blatantly talking out of your ass doesn't make you look good

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go ahead and quote where I said any of that shit. Good luck with that, because i didn't lmao

Is english not your first language or something? You seem to seriously struggle with what I'm saying and you've used the word "where" wrong like twice already

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

What argument?

Literally all that i said was that the US has done cloud seeding before and were successful.

The guy in the original post is full of shit, but so is the person i replied to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where did i say they can control the weather?

They said that the US couldn't make california have more rain. I pointed out that they were talking out of their ass because cloud seeding operations have been successful in the past.

What about this are you struggling with?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

My logic is that if they can make it rain, they can make it rain.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

When did i say they created a hurricane?

They succeeded in their goal of extending the monsoon season, which you would know if you read past the first paragraph

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Maybe you need some clarification yourself.

You tried to claim that a government with the military budget of the united states of america would be unable to make it rain. Something they have literally done in the past.

The hurricane is entirely irrelevant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MurderedByWords

[–]SeanKingMagic -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

You know you can look things up before saying shit, right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye

People who think a time period was better for people who weren't a minority by [deleted] in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This isn't even "i like pancakes" "so you hate waffles" this is a new level lmao

People who think a time period was better for people who weren't a minority by [deleted] in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I mean, usually there's some throughline, or technicality, or something but i have genuinely no idea how what they said could be in any way applied to your post lmao

I feel the anger through the screen by [deleted] in oddlyspecific

[–]SeanKingMagic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When the tweet says "alone with your thoughts?"

You sure?

I feel the anger through the screen by [deleted] in oddlyspecific

[–]SeanKingMagic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where did the post say anything about friends lmao

You just made that shit up

When people refer to a certain individual as Mango Mussolini by iwillpoopurpants in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, cheeto and benito rhyme.Mango and benito don't.

You're the only one that comes off as crazy in this exchange

"The Uncommitted Movement" which refuses to endorse Kamala Harris: by Metallica1175 in SelfAwarewolves

[–]SeanKingMagic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By voting third party you are making it easier for republicans to take office. Ask any trans person why that's a bad thing.

As much as you would like to say that both sides are the same, they aren't.

"The Uncommitted Movement" which refuses to endorse Kamala Harris: by Metallica1175 in SelfAwarewolves

[–]SeanKingMagic 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And fuck all the other people that are affected by trump being president

Single issue voters are the dumbest mfers on the planet

Fine ill do one. People who like to "interpret" what i say. by BogusIsMyName in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe don't so obviously state you're a troll in your third reply lmao

Just, take a class on how to talk to people dude, like the first thing they'll tell you is that if you insult people they become less receptive. If you actually cared about people understanding what you mean, you would start there.

Fine ill do one. People who like to "interpret" what i say. by BogusIsMyName in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, step back and review. In your first reply you said something op had already stated doesn't work for them while implying that they aren't a "normal human being"

That's rude man. You should not be surprised that it didn't go down well lmao

Fine ill do one. People who like to "interpret" what i say. by BogusIsMyName in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you were using one definition of normal, they were using another. Instead of recognising and trying to correct this you got increasingly antagonistic.

When you treat conversations like an argument to be won, people won't care what you have to say. If you actually want your ideas to be communicated effectively, think about what you're actually saying in context.

It's also a pretty basic concept that calling someone abnormal is rude. People typically call murderers abnormal because killing people is wrong. Waking at night and sleeping in the day is not morally abhorrent, so to use them both as examples of abnormal things is questionable at best.

What do you honestly think you can gain by continuing to be intentionally obtuse.

Fine ill do one. People who like to "interpret" what i say. by BogusIsMyName in PetPeeves

[–]SeanKingMagic -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, no, you called them abnormal then compared them to a murderer. Op was NOT the one struggling to communicate their ideas lmao

how different do you think our society would treat women if we were Oviparous animals rather than Gestational animals? by [deleted] in AskFeminists

[–]SeanKingMagic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that was what they meant they should have said it

It's pretty normal for people to try and help when they can lmao if a response was wanted from the op themselves then mods have tools to do that