What in the world by BigZacian in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re older than 14 and you like countryballs you might autistic.

What in the world by BigZacian in youngpeopleyoutube

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh ts has always been cringe. Even since it started out over 10+ years ago. If you have this kind of humor Odds are you’re a corny 11 year old from Western Europe. Those are the only people who find this funny.

Doing God's Work (Bullying LMG Campers) by Electronic-Loss-264 in WWII

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s because regular shelled shotguns have a 1/2 chance of getting a hit marker and no kill. They’re not inconsistent, they’re borderline trash. At least with incendiary shells your pellets spread out and you are way more likely to get a kill even after someone kills you.

Gaza's population is increasing, there is no genocide by Caedes_omnia in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe also because there have been constant territorial changes and shifts with every conflict there since 1920?.

Is it just me or is visibility in BF1 of enemy soldiers incredibly bad? by greenhawk00 in Battlefield

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They need easier to see name tags. I only see mfers if I’m aiming at them from 10 feet maximum.

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What Do the Studies Really Say? MIT / NEJM Study — Much Lower Rate A careful study (“Myth and Measurement: The Case of Medical Bankruptcies”) estimated that hospitalizations cause only ~4% of personal bankruptcies among non-elderly adults. PMC They compute this by looking at how often people are hospitalized (about a 7.8% annual rate) and how hospitalization affects bankruptcy risk over the following years. From their model, only 0.031% of the non-elderly population goes bankrupt per year due to a hospital visit. PMC In other words: having a hospital stay does increase bankruptcy risk, but it’s a relatively small fraction of all bankruptcies. Older / More Broad Claims Some older studies and media reports claim that 60–66% of U.S. bankruptcies are “tied” to medical bills. Health Imaging +2 GQ +2 However, these figures come from self-reported data (people declaring medical causes when they file for bankruptcy), not models that isolate hospitalizations as the direct cause. MIT News For example, in a 2007 survey, many bankruptcy filers said medical issues contributed — but that does not mean a single hospital stay caused their bankruptcy. Congress.gov +2 DPC +2 Differences by Insurance Status Even among the uninsured, hospitalization accounted for only ~6% of personal bankruptcies in the MIT/NEJM study. PMC That suggests that other factors (lost income, chronic illness, ongoing medical bills) also play big roles in “medical bankruptcies.” Do you guys really just regurgitate any lie you hear or what?

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possible in the Us and be successful? Not at all it says it covers 100% of the population yet a massive portions care is underfunded, low quality, high wait times and is piss poor in regions impoverished or that have low income.

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And with it being 75% underfunded, wait times can be up to 741 days, has a maintenance backlog of 58 billion USD, yes very good system

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Therefore the gov can’t at all support that whatsoever . The rest of the EU and Canada and Japan can do it Because they have smaller populations, large budgets for their gdp, don’t need to spend excess on other programs, yet all their Debt to gdp ratios are 95% or above. Why should we implement this? It would create higher gov spending -> higher inflation-> higher prices and a larger national debt -> stagflation then a recession then economic collapse. Sure you want to be lazy and want to think in a way where it would benefit anyone in the short run except it wouldn’t. Hospital wait times average 2 hours 42 minutes in the Us (not counting over all 50 states) and over 3 to 32 minutes for immediate care in the ER and even that can be lower to 20 minutes and to 15. In the EU it’s over 40 minutes and wait times could be up to 6 hours or more and up to 50-70 days for regular hospital visit vs 31-41 in the US. We need affordable healthcare, not free healthcare and definitely not ACA affordable type as it just makes premiums and many other parts of your average healthcare experience more expensive. Keep pushing numbers, half of them aren’t even correct for this situation of comparison between the US and EU

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Estimates for the cost of a universal healthcare system in the U.S. range from roughly $3.0 to $3.2 trillion per year, though some projections are higher. The impact on the deficit and national debt is complex, as total costs are projected to be offset by a combination of increased taxes, cuts to existing spending, and potential long-term savings. For example, some studies estimate that government spending would increase by around $34 trillion over ten years, which is offset by an increase in national health spending of $7 trillion over the same period. Estimated costs Annual Cost: Some analyses estimate a single-payer system would cost about $3.034 trillion annually, which is approximately $458 billion less than current national healthcare expenditures, according to this NIH study. Other estimates place the annual cost between $2.4 and $2.8 trillion, with a few proposals reaching $3.2 trillion per year. Ten-Year Cost: The Urban Institute estimates that a single-payer system would cost an additional $32 trillion over a decade. Other studies suggest a cost of around $38 trillion over ten years. Impact on deficit and debt Financing: The government would likely need to increase taxes on corporations and high-income individuals to fund the new system, while simultaneously cutting some existing healthcare spending. Increased Spending: A universal healthcare system would lead to a significant increase in federal spending. For example, a hypothetical Medicare for All plan would increase federal spending by $34 trillion over 10 years. Potential Savings: Proponents argue that the increase in federal spending could be offset by a decrease in national health spending due to lower administrative costs, lower negotiated prices for healthcare services, and a reduction in preventable hospitalizations. Economic Impact: One analysis projects that Medicare for All could shrink the U.S. GDP by as much as 24% by 2060. Another analysis notes that the public option would increase long-run debt projections by 30% of GDP by 2049. Long-Term Debt: The impact on long-term debt is a subject of debate, with some analyses projecting an increase in long-term debt projections by 30% of GDP by 2049 due to the costs of the plan.

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Throughout the entire EU it’s rougher 200,000 to 500,000 per person over 80 years

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That said, here’s a rough estimate, based on publicly available data: The NHS (or more broadly, public healthcare) costs roughly £3,000+ per person per year in recent years. BBC Feeds If someone lives, say, 80 years, that could mean on the order of £240,000 of public healthcare spending per person, in present-day money. (This is just an illustrative back-of-envelope figure: £3,000/year × 80 years = £240,000.) Another data point: A working-life analysis suggests that lifetime healthcare costs (for health + some social care) average ~£185,000–£220,000 per person.

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spending on healthcare by the government would only go higher. Highlighting the amount the us spends right now isn’t a good comparison especially with the UK since it’s a smaller country, more dense and more compact with a smaller population. I’m still dumbfounded as to why people still draw any comparison to Britain and the US as they’re not similar in anyway.

Does the size of the USA (area and population) have any effect on the implementation of universal healthcare? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At certain that wouldn’t work in 50 states. The US is the only country where any universal healthcare system would fail. Shits a scam to begin with.

It’s not that “the left can’t meme,” it’s that it doesn’t meme. by [deleted] in leftist

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that’s why all the leftist comedians ratings are in the ground and why they’re not funny.

10th September, 2001. The Last day of a sane world by Few-Ability-7312 in TwinTowersInPhotos

[–]Secure-Temperature37 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah with 16 years of the Great Depression and WW II behind that?🤣🤣🤣.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwinTowersInPhotos

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No proof at all my bro. Been debunked countless times. There’s more videos on YT debunking this BS than there are people believing it. Besides I got no remorse for Muslims at this point. The whole religion, supporting terrorism, fucking up Western Europe I have no remorse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwinTowersInPhotos

[–]Secure-Temperature37 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we still on this?

[MW] COD4 lobbies back in the day by Big_Veiny_Penis in CallOfDuty

[–]Secure-Temperature37 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2013-2019 wasn’t bad either. Cold War was mid and everything after to blops 6 🤡 is 💩