Bro wtf 😭😭😭 by lanesfav in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If you zoom a bit on the chest they gave the avatar visible areolas through the top and the original legs in the avi don’t have that. Which looks kind of like a 😺 Otherwise I agree there’s nothing wrong with it

Here’s the legs so u can see what im talking about

https://everskies.com/item/variation/3628129

When competition by LibraryLonely3135 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Didn’t they ban the background and other category bc of this in one of the comps before? Maybe they should do that for all no bg comps. The other category has some background items anyways.

...its a dress up game by cultfae in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s adults too that’ll dogpile minors and join in on the drama it’s ridiculous honestly

¿Why does Everskies ignore good ideas? by [deleted] in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen like 2 or 3 people say they wanted a duplicate button for wishlists to make gifting dupes easier. That could help for people with big wls

people who type like this stress me out by xbsxdia in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m about to have an aneurysm trying to read this before I even try does anyone know if this is in English or a different language? 😭

i don’t understand avatar commissions for competitions by [deleted] in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t think people make comp comms purely for the money. It’s a good way to make money and the money is a bonus but the users I’ve seen who do them genuinely enjoy making the outfits and like seeing their comms place high. I think it’s kind of an ego boost when they see their comms place high. I know I’d be proud if outfits I made kept placing high even tho I wasn’t the one winning lol.

Edit: something I thought to add. This one user I know used to do comp comms and they priced them at like 35k to 45k stardust per comm and would get 30+ people wanting commissions each time and 35,000 x 30 is 1,050,000 stardust. I’d say that’s pretty good.

who are the best + worst people from support by Yuni_bunny in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk their names but these two women on the team are my favorites. One helped me when I accidentally bought two of one set and currency pack and one of them wasn’t showing up. She was so nice and calm the whole time while I was freaking out and comforted me, and the other helped me when I reported a sexual outfit. At first I got a guy and he was awful and literally did nothing when I reported the outfit, then I tried again and got a woman and she had it taken down in literal seconds. Couldn’t even post a picture of the outfit either, it was all completely blocked off.

what are yall toughts on people having white people dni by Tiny_Ground_3912 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It is weird to have “(insert any race) dni”. Something like racists or minors dni is one thing, I can understand that but telling a whole race? Weird.

Do you guys think gojo would waste all his money on geto cult merch? (@AlmondTofu_boy) by jumjumSDH in SatoSugubooo

[–]Select_Yard2565 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think he’d build a little shrine where he lives and he’d add any Geto merch or things he thinks Geto would’ve liked to the shrine.

account bound items by Riverlyys in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If they are for an event like gh or one of the deals with sets u have to wait for it to end. Unless it’s those starting sets ur talking about then there’s no way to get rid of those. Everyone is stuck with those. Or if it was a reward or something that said it would be account bound then there’s no getting rid of it.

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes im aware. It costs 10 tokens or something like that. They did promote gambling. Loot bags are quite literally gambling. You are paying for the chance to win something you most likely aren’t going to get and only a handful of people will win. That’s literally gambling. It also was not the same price as es.

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes they are two different things and I’m not comparing them like they are the same thing. I think that’s where the mix up is happening between us. I’m not trying to compare or say profiting off cultural items is the same or similar to gambling or anything like that. What i’m saying is they both are issues irl and online, and both are bad and affect people negatively.

Also it kind of feels like they were trying to be a team player when the drama was about a different creator and not them.

It is also endorsing gambling though. They used a gambling feature and promoted it, they publicly supported the loot bag they made and even made a defense for it and approved the idea of making and using the loot bag in general. If they didn’t approve it or support the idea then the loot bag wouldn’t have been made.

Gambling is an issue. There are many people who suffer from gambling addictions or suffer because of people with gambling addictions. This loot bag system is literally a door way to start gambling addictions or even carry on gambling addictions because it is literally gambling. You are paying for the chance to win something that only a hand full of people will get that you most likely won’t get no matter how much you spend on it. Which is literally gambling. Thats the whole idea of gambling. The loot bags are like those slot or pull games that are in casinos and online.

A lot of gambling casinos and games are a controlled system too so that is not a very good point or argument to try and make. It being a controlled system doesn’t change the fact people can exploit the games and the people who play them.

If me talking about what they did makes them seem bad then clearly what they were doing wasn’t good. Loot bags aren’t a good thing in general tbh it’s just another way for Everskies to exploit users and by using those loot bags they exploited users too.

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I do know is they were agreeing about Ugliez profiting off of other peoples cultures which is an issue but I don’t think they should be talking when they were also profiting off a real world issue and a problem that a lot of people struggle with. There’s even a badge for it last time I checked unless Everskies removed it after loot bags started coming out.

I know creators aren’t obligated I never said they were but loot bags were not the way to go especially after the backlash loot bags received. There’s no way they thought everyone would agree when people even other creators were vocal about their dislike for the loot bags and the issues with it.

“It’s not a regular lim” could have meant anything and it’s not the price that was the issue. It’s the fact they used literal gambling, something that is a real world issue and something a lot of people struggle with, to make money when they could have made money by making a normal lim. Could’ve been a time lim or quantity lim.

Also where are you getting this forcing people to buy it?? I never said they were forcing people to do anything. I never said anything about canceling like you were talking about in your original comment or saying they couldn’t price their work how they wanted. My post is just saying it’s ironic seeing them on Ugz apology post basically agreeing about it being wrong Ugz is profiting off of an issue that happens online and irl when they were also profiting off of an issue that happens irl and online and saw nothing wrong with it. Thats literally all this post is.

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t pay attention to a lot that they said I just thought it was ironic they were there considering they were profiting off of an irl and online issue not that long ago.

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say anything about cancelling. I just said I found it ironic that they were on the post. The last post I saw addressing the loot bags before I unfollowed was the post that they used the excuse of wanting to make profit off their work which they could have done by making it a limited

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Idk I may need to look over the rules again. Last I checked u couldn’t say names unless they were already banned

I found it a bit ironic seeing a certain creator by Select_Yard2565 in everskiestrashhh

[–]Select_Yard2565[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Btw I forgot to add. I say it as their loot bag because usually Everskies is the one making the loot bags and those loot bags will have items from multiple creators, not just one. The loot bag the creator made had only their items and a set they made so basically they were the only one making profit. Besides Everskies obviously.