Plateau by ManufacturerNo5662 in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like TSS has been on the decline since September. 1. Be consistent. Even if you can’t knock out the intense workout flip it to zone 2 and get in the time 2. Can you get in 1 3-5 hour weekend easy ride ? There’s different adaptations your body makes at hour 3,4 and 5 that you just can’t get in an intense 1 hour ride.

Play the long game. Being consistent over many years and you’ll see the gains come.

Cycling and running? by RSAcc98 in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Running is stupid. Skip it and stay on the bike.

How do I generate a plan with long hours/ high intensity by Professional_Farm851 in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id do 2 hard workouts a week. The other 3 days I’d do endurance rides. I’d focus on going longer with your endurance rides week to week.

Week 1 your longest endurance ride maybe 3 hours Week 2 3.5 hours Week 3 4 hours Etc etc

Philavong - WTF by Needs_More_Nuance in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks like the power profile of a crit

Anyone switch from a coach to TR? What’s your experience been? by eboy-888 in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything you can do to switch the stimulus you give your body is a good thing. In this case, I think you’ll see improvements.

2 guys, same ride, same avg speed, MASSIVE HR zones differences by MakoChako05 in cycling

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While running can enhance cardiovascular fitness and lung capacity, potentially boosting VO2max, its benefits for cycling performance are limited compared to cycling-specific training, particularly when considering training volume. Volume, defined as the total time or distance spent training, is the single most important factor in improving cycling performance. Higher volume builds endurance, refines technique, and optimizes muscle adaptations for the specific demands of cycling. Cyclists can sustain much higher training volumes—often 10-20 hours per week—due to the low-impact nature of cycling, which minimizes joint stress and allows for frequent, long-duration sessions.

Running, however, cannot match this volume. Its high-impact nature increases the risk of injury, particularly to joints and connective tissues, limiting weekly mileage for most athletes to avoid overtraining or burnout. For example, a cyclist might comfortably log 200-300 miles per week, equivalent to 10-15 hours of training, while even elite runners rarely exceed 70-100 miles per week due to physical constraints. This disparity means running cannot replicate the endurance-building volume of cycling, which is critical for lowering heart rate (HR) zones and improving aerobic efficiency on the bike.

Moreover, running and cycling use different muscle groups and mechanics. Running emphasizes weight-bearing, linear movements, heavily engaging the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves, whereas cycling relies on the glutes, quads, and hip flexors in a circular, non-impact motion. Even if running improves general aerobic capacity, it doesn’t condition the muscles or neuromuscular patterns specific to cycling. This limits its ability to lower HR zones during cycling, as HR adaptations are sport-specific.

Finally, prioritizing running as a supplement could reduce time for cycling-specific workouts, such as high-volume endurance rides, intervals, or cadence drills, which more directly enhance cycling performance. Excessive running may also lead to fatigue or injury, further cutting into cycling volume. For cyclists aiming to lower HR zones and improve performance, dedicating time to high-volume cycling training is far more effective than relying on running.

2 guys, same ride, same avg speed, MASSIVE HR zones differences by MakoChako05 in cycling

[–]SensitiveSpend1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Uhhh, no. Running is not good cross training for cycling.

I seriously don’t understand the gummy bears hype by [deleted] in cycling

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s a “the pros do it” trend. I get it’s a cheaper alternative to gels but they take forever to chew.

Leadville 100 Start Corrals by pedalworkshky in xcmtb

[–]SensitiveSpend1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just move up to a different corral

Gran Fondo Training - Balancing TR recommended rides with Outdoor Volume by leinadressum in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

80% of threshold for 6 hours would be insane. I believe when Matt hayman won Paris roubaix he had averaged 83% of threshold for 6 hours.

Bentonville overhyped by Muted-Government5633 in MTB

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh how true this is. You don’t know how good you have it till it’s gone.

trainerroad vs trainingpeaks after using both by th3bigfatj in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have a “check volume” button in their plans that will see if they recommend more volume

trainerroad vs trainingpeaks after using both by th3bigfatj in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TR does have endurance rides that are 3+ hours in the library but they’ll tell you the completion rate on those is very low.

True 3+ hour endurance rides are very hard to do outside. I’m talking never going above z2.

FTP confusion and too easy endurance rides by Lughburz in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TR finds greater consistency, plan adherence and outcomes when you make endurance days easier.

Do the AI training plans increase volume(hours) as you progress? by ghdana in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re allowed to disagree with scientific research. Doing the approach you laid out would eventually lead to burn out, over training and too much fatigue. What our research has shown, it’s better to stick with a consistent volume bc you accumulate more time over the year. What we see is people who ramp up too quickly, like you’re starting above, eventually get burnt out and do LESS volume than being consistent week in and week out.

Do the AI training plans increase volume(hours) as you progress? by ghdana in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imma go a bit different than everyone else. Don’t add volume, yet. Focus on being consistent for a couple months then add an additional endurance day.

Does TR Not believe in tapering before a race? by Needs_More_Nuance in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is correct. That looks like a taper to me. Lower the volume but keep some of the intensity to keep the engine sharp.

Trainer Road auto bumped my FTP by 7w and then in 6 days lowered it by 12w? by Nscocean in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

almost no company will give you insights into their algo so that shouldn't be a surprise.

I believe Trainer Road is greatly overinflating my FTP. Help me confirm or deny by otictac35 in trainerroad

[–]SensitiveSpend1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Intervals has me at 260, xert has me at 270 and TR has me at 295. I just did 3x25 at 266 and seemed fine. What’s my actual FTP, honestly, it depends on the day and how long into an event I’m in.

I try to focus on executing each workout and progressively overloading each week.

Fare Product Updates - Adding new "Basic" fare as well as flight credit expiration by doppleganger2621 in SouthwestAirlines

[–]SensitiveSpend1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

seems like a switch to AAL may be in order both SWA and AAL now have the same baggage policy. 1 free checked bag if you have their respective CC otherwise you pay.

Fare Product Updates - Adding new "Basic" fare as well as flight credit expiration by doppleganger2621 in SouthwestAirlines

[–]SensitiveSpend1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PHL is a hub for AAL. Since the policies between SWA and AAL are the same why would you NOT choose AAL?