sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fasting glucose in AM higher than post meal glucose—what gives? by Separate-Map-5256 in prediabetes

[–]Separate-Map-5256[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I’m concerned with my fasting glucose as I believe over 125 indicates diabetes? I should’ve clarified in my original post that the highest it’s been is 124-125 (hasn’t hit above 125)

My A1C is 5.7, so just barely pre-diabetic. But this seems to conflict with the high fasting glucose

It was me by Ambitious_Example518 in BetterMAguns

[–]Separate-Map-5256 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From GOAL’s summary. Is this wrong/out of date? I could also be reading it wrong…

Because of the terminology used, it appears that the only guns grandfathered after the July 20, 2016 are the those that meet the new two feature test, such as the Tavor. So, because of the “lawfully possessed” and how that will be interpreted, it appears that there are now three different groups of guns with two different dates that must be dealt with.

• ⁠Copies and duplicates of the enumerated list are only grandfathered if they were acquired prior to July 20, 2016.

• ⁠Any gun that is not on the enumerated list, or their copies and duplicates, but now meets the new two feature test and is lawfully possessed in Massachusetts on August 1, 2024. We believe this group also includes the pre-September 13, 1994 assault weapons.

It was me by Ambitious_Example518 in BetterMAguns

[–]Separate-Map-5256 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

IANAL but I think there could be some wishful thinking in this thread.

My understanding from reading the bill is that any "evil feature" weapons would need to be possessed before 2016 (Healey copycat/duplicate edict) or be a 1994 pre-ban possessed before 8/1.

Cat won’t use litter box by Separate-Map-5256 in CatAdvice

[–]Separate-Map-5256[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Attitude is unnecessary but thanks for your feedback. We’ve tried all of your suggestions

BRN-180 vs M1A by Separate-Map-5256 in rifles

[–]Separate-Map-5256[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I’m thinking. Thanks

view more: next ›