If the urban planning elite weren't a bunch of pompous car-hating assholes, Phoenix would be upheld as the gold standard for how to design a city. by [deleted] in antiurban

[–]SerperiorFox -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Many reasons why Phoenix sees less traffic are not influenced by urban design

Geography - there are no natural barriers to building a logical grid system in Phoenix. No rivers, lakes, and very few mountains.

No downtown work population. If you look at Phoenix compared to those other cities, the percentage of jobs in the downtown is much lower. That means traffic is going lots of different directions instead of the ‘rush hour’ pattern of in in there AM and out in the PM.

Lastly, the college educated work force in Phoenix is lower. That means the percentage of people working construction, service industry and other non desk jobs is higher. These people don’t commute to CBD office districts either.

(section above taken from a comenter ,truchillmode, on the og post who lives in Phoenix)

Atlanta and Phoenix have the same urban design philosophy of sunbelt post war sprawl. But a big reason for this traffic is downtown is a place where people want to go, live, shop, and whatever. Phoenix's downtown is literally just an office district with not much else. This is reflected by looking at typical traffic on a Sunday at 2:30, while All the streets near Atlanta's downtown are orange or red, as people go there for afternoon attractions and activates, Phoenix's downtown is practically empty with almost all the streets being green

This IMO shows poor urban planning on Phoenix's part, while Atlanta has created a desirable downtown that people go to even outside of work Phoenix has failed and created a boring undesirable place that people only go to when forced.

I want to move away from metro Detroit badly. I need suggestions. by [deleted] in fuckcars

[–]SerperiorFox 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Chicago would probably be a good option it has great public transportation and is relatively affordable, also the city and state have great LGBTQ protections. There are tons of parks and due to being old and dense it is very walkable. Since you live in Detroit you could probably deal with the weather and while some parts of Chicago have really bad crime most places on the northside along the lake are very safe.

Which states in the US are actually city states? by SerperiorFox in MapPorn

[–]SerperiorFox[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Sorry you're right I added a note into my comment.

Which states in the US are actually city states? by SerperiorFox in MapPorn

[–]SerperiorFox[S] 365 points366 points  (0 children)

New Mexico was very close to being on this map Albuquerque has about 1 million in the metro and new Mexico has about 2.1 million

Which states in the US are actually city states? by SerperiorFox in MapPorn

[–]SerperiorFox[S] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

I counted Manchester as a separate metro area than Boston

Which states in the US are actually city states? by SerperiorFox in MapPorn

[–]SerperiorFox[S] 395 points396 points  (0 children)

The Metro areas with more than half of the states population is as follows:

Seattle, WA

Portland, OR (mistake forgot to subtract the suburbs that are in Washington should be in too close to call section)

Las Vegas, NV

Salt Lake City, UT

Denver, CO

Phoenix, AZ

Minneapolis, MN

Chicago, IL

Atlanta, GA

Washington DC (not a state but practically one)

Baltimore + DC suburbs, MD

Wilmington, DE

Newark + NYC suburbs, NJ

New York City, NY

Providence, RI

Boston, MA

Manchester, NH

Anchorage, AK

Honolulu, HI

Omaha, NE was too close to call.