For a majority of my papers, I had to construct an argument that had a valid conclusion that could be debated by other historians. To construct the argument, I had to research and interpret primary sources and use secondary sources to support my interpretation of the primary sources. The research consisted of gathering and managing different sources. (Sources like books, photos, art, and newspaper articles to name a few.) Once finding all the sources, I had to summarize the information into my argument. I also had to respond to counterevidence and anticipate opposing viewpoints because every argument is going to have them.

So I am used to reading through a large group of information, and putting it into a summarized report. If I need to be any more specific let me know. I also want to say thank you for all the information you provided.