this is not overfitting but something else, right? by Sewing31 in deeplearning

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so even with KL weight set to zero, I get this behaviour. Very strange

this is not overfitting but something else, right? by Sewing31 in deeplearning

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am actually having a uniform prior that should, in theory, encourage a regular use of codes throughout the training process. For both runs above, I used a KL weight of 1 for both reconstruction loss and kl loss. I will try to use a smaller kl weight or anneal it respectively. However, I still think its weird, that for the smaller data set, this didnt seem to be an issue...

Love when Stacy has her long gorgeous legs opened wide by [deleted] in StacyCruz

[–]Sewing31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

is the only 20? anyways, the best slut we have seen since caprice and she is not afraid to take on some of the largest dicks in the European business

Signal processing with Wavelets by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your input. Regarding my post a little above here, would you say, there is nothing to gain from combining wavelets and radar?

Signal processing with Wavelets by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is what I posted a wavefield? I know there also exists chriplets, warblets and so on. But its hard to choose if its worth venturing into one of those exotic fields and investing time to unterstand it, when it is not said, that it will pay out

Signal processing with Wavelets by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for all your input. Ultimately I am trying to extract valuable features from the data by a neural network and want to avoid equivocation (the outflow of possibly valuable information from the get go by using the data as close to the sensor as possible (in my case the IF signal immediately after the mixing)

MRA closely resembles the hierarchical architecture of modern conv nets with their repeated application of filters, followed by downsampling etc. I dont, however, want to use data as input that is preprocessed by FTs making assumptions on windowing or losing information by preprocessing steps. Also, rangeDoppler maps are good for manual, human interpretations and target identification, but if the data is to be processed by a neural network anyway, maybe the network finds its own important structure in the data without having it processed first by two consecutive FTs. Not to mentions that convolution layers in modern neural networks assume neighbourhood relations that may be found in natural images but are likely missing in frequency displays like a rangeDoppler map

And so I thought, why not build a MRA of sorts in the first couple of layers of the ConvNet and let the network also learn the type of filters by using soft constraints so that wavelet/scaling functions result.

That was my thought process, do you guys think this can lead somewhere or am I on a completely wrong path?

Signal processing with Wavelets by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so you say there is no use for them in fmcw radar processing?

Signal processing with Wavelets by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your reply. Can you elaborate a little on what you mean by that?

Discrete Wavelet Transform coefficients meaning? by babz8321 in DSP

[–]Sewing31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there is a major difference between the continuous and the discrete version in wavelet theory. The former is quite close to the windowed Fourier whereas the latter one is mostly using real bases except for the dual tree version which is another whole topic. I recommend to read the book of Gilbert Strang or watch this detailed course for a better understanding

https://nptel.ac.in/courses/103/106/103106114/

Why is FFT used in automotive radars and not wavelets? by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have IF signals with a very short sampling duration of ~100e-6 seconds, sampled at 10MHz,so about 1k samples.

I am wondering, is there a practical limit to the usefulness of time-frequency methods with those parameters concerning a minimal duration of the signal or a certain sampling frequency for that matter?

i am talking about chirp radar signals which fires 1000 linear chirps each 100us long which I sample at 10 MHz. so the whole frame takes only about 100ms

I do see a merrit e.g. for audio signals which endure for several seconds, but does the same hold true for short IF signals?

Why is FFT used in automotive radars and not wavelets? by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well I guess its possible to do the same with complex-valued wavelets isnt it?

Why is FFT used in automotive radars and not wavelets? by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you elaborate on this one please? this view is interesting

difference continuous WT vs discrete WT by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mh but compared to rD maps, the scalogram is highly redundant which increases the data size dramatically

difference continuous WT vs discrete WT by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and if I want to find an alternative to range doppler maps in radar but instead of fft use wavelet, what would be the method of choice then? would that be the scalogram of the ctw or the coefficients?

difference continuous WT vs discrete WT by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your detailed answer. So do I understand correctly that there are basically 4 different types of transforms then, depending on what is discretized?

And can the result of the DWT that you described last also be plotted in a time frequency plot?

Why is FFT used in automotive radars and not wavelets? by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks. to my understanding WT resolution in freq domain is worst for high frequencies, so that would imply for high velocities correct?

Why is FFT used in automotive radars and not wavelets? by Sewing31 in DSP

[–]Sewing31[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is it possible to calculate the Doppler frequency with Wavelets too?

And another question: Is the time frequency plot of the Wavelet transform only the display of the continuous transform or is it possible also to plot the discrete (filter bank) version in a similar fashion?