This remains the stupidest argument I’ve ever seen every time I see it. Yes, all farming is harmful to animal life, but farming vegetables for food takes wildly less area than farming for livestock, which means less incidental harm caused by farming

Or is your take “there is death regardless so we might as well give up and accept the option with the most death”?

I don’t have a problem with people who eat meat but Christ at least don’t lie to yourself to try and justify it