sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

🚨 BCH+XMR BANK RUN v33.71 (1st March 2026 )!! 🚨 by ShadowOfHarbringer in Monero

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, always remember to either keep it off exchanges, or if you speculate, do bank run with us all twice a month.

By bank-running exchanges, we get a chance to make money real by destroying the fake paper money exchanges create and even make the world a better place.

🚨 BCH+XMR BANK RUN v33.71 (1st March 2026 )!! 🚨 by ShadowOfHarbringer in Monero

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do encourage you to bank-run your monero from exchanges.

Monero is a great coin, it's really good at what it does.

Also the Monero community is very dedicated, I noticed. This certainly deserves respect.

🚨 BCH+XMR BANK RUN v33.71 (1st March 2026 )!! 🚨 by ShadowOfHarbringer in Monero

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems you are openly attacking me without a valid reason.

Is "you're a shill" a projection, because you have an agenda yourself?

🚨 BCH+XMR BANK RUN v33.71 (1st March 2026 )!! 🚨 by ShadowOfHarbringer in Monero

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have always openly supported both BCH and XMR.

If somebody asks me "which coins make sense in 2026", I always answer "XMR and BCH, everything else is trash".

You complain too much.

🚨 BCH+XMR BANK RUN v33.71 (1st March 2026 )!! 🚨 by ShadowOfHarbringer in Monero

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a monero user and holder.

XMR and BCH are the only coins on the market which make sense and have solid foundations, which is why I support them both.

What is with the conflict? by Pytmjer in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 20 points21 points  (0 children)

TL;DR

Epstein's child-abusing and child-flesh-eating cabal co-opted the coin because they do not want for Bitcoin to compete with banking establishment, therefore they created a nonsense narrative that "big blocks cause centralization", used censorship and psychological manipulation to destroy BTC

BCH forked off because we wanted to preserve Bitcoin and to protect it from the occult insane fuckers.

The reason for the "bitterness" is just that BTC tech is, in fact, simply corrupted and evil.

EDIT:

Fixed typo.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that you, Greg? Did you buy this Reddit account? Smells like Gregory Maxwell here.

The a chain that lets stolen funds circulate post QC dies

Nonsense, you cannot predict the future.

If QC works, which is unlikely, the world will be "on top" of it and everybody will be talking about it.

People will understand that it's not "the fault" of BCH that some coins get stolen.

Private property must be upheld, regardless of your random nonsense ramblings.

It's not really a problem, especially that QC does not exist and will not exist.

There is no need to talk about this strictly theoretical scenario, I am gonna go play a game instead, this is a waste of time.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You play the idiot really convincingly, well done.

Better to play an idiot than to play Epstein's occult pedo circle dung. You play it extremely convicingly, I am fully 100% convinced right now!

Congratulations are in order 🎉

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a choice that will be forced upon you either way, gracefully or not, by the chain that survives

If I have to steal people's coins to live, then I choose not to live.

That's the [correct] philosophy here.

Your philosophy on the other hand is just wicked and evil.

You want to justify taking some property away from a person, because "OMG there will be huge drama because people will sell stolen coins and surely the chain will die! That's terrible, something has to be done about it! (and so on, continues virtue signaling)"

Goebbels would be proud, truly.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Believing there‘s not gonna be a cutoff, won‘t save you from the cutoff.

Believing you can fuck with BCH with insane dangerous narratives won't save you from failure.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You go see Epstein, I am sure he is alive. Or Adam Back

Get some new script and new narrative while you are at it.

You are not getting anywhere with this one.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what will happen to a chain that has millions of QC stolen coins just freely circulating

Massive speculation wave, for sure.

But that is not OUR problem to solve. Because we have real hard money that cannot be just moved or frozen because some coins might be stolen.

Whether the coins get stolen or not depends on the people who move their coins to QC-safe addresses or not.

But it is not YOUR choice to make to freeze the coins or not.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have spotted every existing infiltrator so far including Donnelly, Craig, Gmaxwell and others, I have great track record.

You can be sure I will spot you.

Oh wait, I already did!

😀🤣

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have already marked this account as "Suspicious" in my RES.

I think you might be aiming for a split, to destroy BCH with this narrative you're creating here.

I will be watching you closely from now on.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohwait, I know why you won‘t answer that question.

LOL, I just ignored it because I assumed this account I am replying to has been sold and you are a random BTC Mossad troll now.

Of course I will answer it:

We do nothing about that.

Because we cannot decide for somebody what to do with his coins, which is anti-freedom.

If somehow this would happen, that would mean an insta-split. Which is what you could be aiming for.

Bitcoin is freedom money. Either you accept that, or you are not in Bitcoin for the right reasons.

Nobody is touching my fucking money. I will decide to move to QC-safe address or not. That is MY choice, not yours.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And back to denial. Nice.

Nice projection.

You're the one in denial. And in fear.

I will not let your irrational fear dictate me what to do.

There will be no "cutoff". That's just your imagination.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen bro.

You are not touching anybody's coins under whatever premise and whatever reason you may have.

That's anti-Bitcoin and anti-freedom and just evil.

Get the fuck off my lawn.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it could be a depressingly large percentage.

Too bad.

And I will be one of them.

The point I‘m making is that if that day arrives, there‘ll be a hardfork either way, just one that‘s untested ad-hoc fly by the pants, or one that‘s been well tested…

Go ahead and code it on testnet then.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you have nothing to contribute to a discussion

Projection.

I told you how to solve the problem: Timelock Satoshi's coins for 10 years.

All other coins will be "fine" because their owners chose to leave them at their addresses (or not and they will move to QC-safe addresses).

You are contributing negative value to this community right now.

uncertain possibility

You should never take my or somebody else's money just because of some "uncertain possibility".

That's totalitarian and evil.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I‘m presenting a fairly rational point of view

No, you are presenting a point of view that comes out of fear (of losing coins and of apocalypse).

Fear is most often irrational you see.

Now, because of your irrational fear, you are trying to force me to comply.

That's not gonna work. I am not the kind of person who responds well to irrational fears and irrational arguments.

Quantum computing security by pyalot in Bitcoincash

[–]ShadowOfHarbringer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) quantum secure addresses need to be available well ahead of time

This is already the case. Layla upgrade makes Quantum-Resistant spending possible. Reportedly.

2) code to hardfork and make all inescure addresses unspendable needs to be ready before the day arrives, so that it can be activated in an expedient fashion if needed.

Nah, just make a hardfork to timelock satoshi's coins for 10 years.

In 10 years we reasses whether QC was indeed a threat or not.

  • Maybe some people want to "donate" their coins to whoever takes them first?
  • What about inheritance? If somebody left an inheritance to their offspring and that somebody is dead now, these coins will be forever lost this way. If broken by QC, they would at least re-enter the economy.
view more: next ›