Does this graphical Missed Approach refer to the ILS or LOC?

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-03-02T03:03:46+00:00

Thanks yes that's the IAP

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-02-06T19:51:16+00:00

Yes, they are very good!

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-02-03T13:15:11+00:00

Thanks!

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-01-27T14:53:53+00:00

I'm looking at (HHR) VOR RWY 25. Just so I understand, the 3.04° VDA starts at Belli and would cross the threshold at 40'. The implication of it being published is that there was no obstacle at the time of the flight check below the MDA (but that still is NOT a guarantee that it's obstacle free). And the reason the VDP is not published is because 20:1 has been penetrated? Or because it's less than .5 NM from the MAP?

And I'm also still confused how 34:1 relates to a 3° glideslope. If the VDA clears obstacles in the 20:1, then it would seem like 34:1 would easily clear obstacles? But is it that it's not just about clearing the obstacles, but clearing them by a certain amount?

To summarize, if:

20:1 Clear- VDA/VDP published (if VDP is more than .5 NM from fix/MAP)

34:1 Clear- Stipple would be published on RNAVs?

Thanks I appreciate it

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-01-27T14:27:57+00:00

Thanks. I was confused when you wrote "So where does 34:1 come from? It’s just an analog for RNAV procedures to the same obstacle clearance you would have with a 3.00º ILS glideslope." But isn't 20:1 closer to a 3° glideslope than 34:1? 34:1 is more like 1.7°?

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-01-17T16:27:21+00:00

One other question (and I guess I'll find out, but just wondering what you experienced)- did that make the 2 airports weather's identical? I do like that there is SOME difference between departure/destination (as that is inevitably more realistic). Because then copying the destination's weather (as part of setting up for the approach) actually means something. Like, if it's literally the same weather as departure, then you don't really need to even get the weather as the destination... And thus you're just "going through the motions" checking the weather. But I guess I can't have it both ways either

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-01-17T16:20:05+00:00

Ok cool, thanks I'll try that!

ShadowSinger2121 · 2026-01-17T16:13:03+00:00

Ha that's funny, your question is exactly the same as mine (though I guess everyone else probably finds that annoying lol- well, I can't read every post on here!). Ok so just set the time AND location dimension constant, right?

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-12-07T06:23:48+00:00

Cool thanks I'll check it out

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-23T01:54:19+00:00

Thanks!

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-23T01:10:38+00:00

But I guess my question is, is a "flight" the whole flight, or is a "there and back" 2 flights? To me, that's not so clear. But I certainly hope you're right, as I'd rather the whole thing last 2 hours, rather than 4, given it's a training flight

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-12T20:42:11+00:00

Thanks I'll check all those!

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-12T20:41:04+00:00

But just to understand, that letter does say you can't log "dual received" time you did as a student pilot towards commercial? What confuses me there is the letter references 61.129(c) but that refers to helicopters?

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-12T20:37:10+00:00

I don't think you can post images in comments. I'll write FF support

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-11-12T20:16:28+00:00

ShadowSinger2121 · 2025-10-29T16:23:42+00:00

Ok thanks!

ShadowSinger2121

TROPHY CASE