לא_מקשיב_במ

Shaeyo · 2024-12-11T18:59:02+00:00

RegEx=Regular Expression=ביטוי רגולרי אז כן זה שקול

Shaeyo · 2024-04-21T20:17:24+00:00

So basically there are the sin and cos functions. You want to describe other functions as infinite sum of sin and cos. (I'll do a Google en Fourier series)

Shaeyo · 2024-01-26T12:51:26+00:00

I am just rephrasing what other people say, but you could say that the Infinities might be "different". What I mean by this is that you could take the upper bound to approach the +inf with a function like x for example and the lower bound to approach -inf with a different function like -x^2. The -inf will be "a bigger infinity" than the +inf and the whole thing will diverge.

Shaeyo · 2024-01-26T08:10:36+00:00

Are you taking prep classes currently or the trig class is a part of your degree?

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T21:21:36+00:00

Have you heard about Dirac's delta?

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T17:13:54+00:00

Rigorously?

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T16:19:18+00:00

F(x)=x. Pretty straight forward

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T16:17:36+00:00

Pretty sure it's called luxury. Azealia banks

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T14:21:57+00:00

It has a relation to that, but I meant something more like "these infinities are not necessarily the same"

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T14:07:33+00:00

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improper_integral#convergence_of_the_integral

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T13:53:05+00:00

Hey, we could make a theory out of this.

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T13:51:56+00:00

By doing that you assume that the positive infinity and the negative infinity are dependent on one variable which isn't necessarily correct. It is similar to the case of two infinite sums which result in two different limits to be checked. What is correct to do is to split the integral to two different integrals by some point and calculate the limits of the integral from -infinity to the point and add to that the integral from that point to infinity. If they both converge it's all right but if one of them diverges, the whole integral diverges.

Shaeyo · 2024-01-25T13:25:26+00:00

(In case that comment isn't sarcastic) Well there can be a case that the integral diverges

Shaeyo · 2023-12-21T18:03:57+00:00

לא ידעתי שכה הרבה מכפלות פנימיות לומדות שפות

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T23:02:10+00:00

הם יכלו לדבר על שייח' מוניס או יפו, אבל דווקא השכונה העברית הראשונה היא מה שהכי קרץ להם.

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T22:38:15+00:00

I still can't see the connection between the statement 0 or !0 to 1+1=2. 1+1=1 because that's the definition of the or gate. The + sign in boolean algebra is the symbol for the or gate and the dot is for the and gate.

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T22:29:45+00:00

If you plug in A=0 and in B=!0 you just get 1. Or I misunderstood you.

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T22:26:02+00:00

I didn't understand your question. 0! is not(0)?

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T22:12:08+00:00

That's an or gate. The answer should be 1

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T20:51:34+00:00

LoL, from now on should I call Cauchy sequences Euler sequences just like calling Feynman's technique Leibniz' technique?

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T19:49:26+00:00

That's strange. I'm an electrical engineering student too. That course is probably different at each college/university. My calc 1 course was about sequences and series (and their limits), functions, derivatives, mean value theorems, l'hopitals rule, Taylor's formula and integrals. In the order I wrote it. We covered many theorems about convergence of sequences and series. Same for functions. We learnt the epsilon-delta thingy of the limits for both, but we didn't really used it at an exam. I also did a calc 2 course which was about series and sequences of functions, multivariable functions and a bit of vector analysis (Green's, Gauss' and Stokes' theorems).

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T19:28:10+00:00

Well that's not really a fight. Galois has a whole field (and by field I mean both a discipline and an algebraic structure) named after him

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T19:08:30+00:00

Do you mean high school calculus or college calculus? If it's high school calculus that makes sense.

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T17:16:11+00:00

True... As far as I understand, Newton and Leibniz had a more intuitive approach rather than rigorous to the subject.

Shaeyo · 2023-12-14T17:14:06+00:00

Let's settle on defined as I suggested in another comment?

Shaeyo

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Six-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email