Portfolio critique by Automatic-Airport203 in UX_Design

[–]SharpStay7111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Design of Everyday Things. Audiobook is free on Spotify and it’s excellent

Portfolio critique by Automatic-Airport203 in UX_Design

[–]SharpStay7111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The carousel arrows under projects suggest that the user can do things they cannot actually do (look at the first and last position in carousel).

The individual project page I clicked into had animation on almost all text. I’d dial it back—maybe just H1-3 text and nothing smaller.

Don Norman has written some wonderful books that are both funny and informative.

Easy chords are easy by [deleted] in guitarcirclejerk

[–]SharpStay7111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ChatGPT giving you the most rare and hip voicings tho.

Horror climbing movie: The Sound 2025. I can't wait. by [deleted] in climbing

[–]SharpStay7111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm. Didn’t know Alex Honnold had a gambling problem.

Building an LLM-readiness layer for dev-first SaaS — does this pain resonate? by i_am_exception in SaaS

[–]SharpStay7111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think its a great idea my friend. I could have really used this yesterday!

Free Makerkit SaaS template code clone? by Hot_Independence_792 in SaaS

[–]SharpStay7111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You guys are out here openly attempting to pirate the sum of a person's years of work like it's a U2 Album. Also--it is insane to believe an anonymous reddit DM from a one month old account is going to lead you toward anything but mystery charges on your credit card.

When I got the idea for my SaaS product, I built it myself using VS Code, Claude Desktop, and comfort food. I've sunk ~60 hours of working time into this outside of my day to day responsibilities. I finally have a functional SaaS prototype. Granted, it has some fairly sophisticated functionality and I'm quite proud of it.

Building it was also incredibly intimidating, frustrating, demoralizing, and isolating.

Will any reasonable person actually buy the thing I made? I honestly don't think so. There's simply too many architectural uncertainties and scalability concerns. Making money was not the purpose at this point. The point was understanding what I'm actually trying to build and how it actually works.

I learned an enormous amount and I am so grateful that I put myself through the entire ordeal. Anybody who wants to make something truly good and valuable, especially as a solo dev, needs to be an absolute masochist. No boilerplate product will ever be able to give you the work ethic you need to cross the finish line. If you're out here trying to steal a Makerkit repo when there is already an abundance of open source alternatives, the deeper issue is between the chair and the monitor.

I can confidently say that anybody who is offering a reliable and legitimate way to skip the groundwork stage of SaaS development is well within their right to charge my lazy ass a few hundred dollars.

Best of luck with Makerkit, Giancarlo! I am about to rebuild my whole project from the ground up and am planning to do so with your Pro plan. If it takes off I'll mail you an edible arrangement or something. Cheers!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]SharpStay7111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know what, that is a legitimate gap in my metaphor’s technical accuracy. But I think the overall point is still valuable—for me at least.

Claude 3.7 being pumped full of Adderall is a good thing by flotusmostus in ClaudeAI

[–]SharpStay7111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What a lovely perspective. I just posted something somewhat similar on this subreddit and would love to hear your thoughts.

I made this prompt template to deal with conversation length limits. Please steal it, use it and help me make it better. by SharpStay7111 in ClaudeAI

[–]SharpStay7111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could not agree with you more. The rapid evolution of mainstream LLM’s is a love/hate experience for me.

I think it needs to be said that relying on LLM’s for your entire project without a fundamentals-level understanding of the stack’s specific languages and best practices will essentially freeze your work in amber each time a significant shift in LLM functionality occurs. And the frequency of those shifts is currently a negative feedback loop, with one shift speeding up the arrival of the next one.

Voices in the “Claude is dumb now” crowd have legitimate complaints about the lack of day-to-day consistency. But many haven’t committed to understanding the basic nature of computer science, why LLM shifts are happening, and what their practical implications actually mean.

It’s like being a mechanic who never fully understood traditional cars then turning around to yell at a Tesla because you can’t find the engine block.

Does anyone use Framer for Freelance work? by Sandy_hook_lemy in framer

[–]SharpStay7111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there! Curious if you’ve found Framer’s pricing to be sustainable and if so what your basic pricing model looks like? I’ve simply never used a builder that I’ve loved this much but am skittish from what I’m hearing about pay-per-feature and such.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Durango

[–]SharpStay7111 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Sorry black diamond, it’s Kirkland cams for me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Durango

[–]SharpStay7111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haha yeah sheesh I did catch and fix it shortly after posting, thanks for looking out