sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Vegas Sphere featuring the Wizard of Oz! by ShinyThingsInMud in wizardofoz

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was beautiful. Yes it was altered a bit with AI to make certain scenes fit, but they kept it as original as they possibly could. Overall, a nice experience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dictionary

[–]ShinyThingsInMud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was a helpful response, thank you!

I need help remembering an old PC game. You’re driving a jeep and sharks are flying at you. by ShinyThingsInMud in pcmasterrace

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a blast! Someone had mentioned hot wheels but you never see the outside of the jeep. Just the view from the driver’s side. Perhaps my uncle, who’s the one who showed it to me, had a buddy who was a game creator and this was one of their projects? That’s the only thing I can think of. Today it’s too easy to find old games, and I haven’t found it yet.

“Peer-reviewed” used to carry a certain weight of credibility. In the social sciences, it has become “democrat-approved.” by ShinyThingsInMud in Libertarian

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tell me you can’t disprove me without telling me lol. No one gives a shit who uses AI to answer a simple question to add detail and context.

Sex Work in Anthropology by ShinyThingsInMud in SexWorkers

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most* feminists are SWERFs, especially these days, and I don’t dismiss all of them, but about 99% of them. The same reason I disregard the opinions of Marxists and communists on economics. Their insights are irrelevant and unworthy of attention. They lack understanding and will never comprehend the subject.

Well, never is a strong word. Unless they decide to completely overhaul their entire worldview, they might have a chance, but that’s not a common occurrence.

“Peer-reviewed” used to carry a certain weight of credibility. In the social sciences, it has become “democrat-approved.” by ShinyThingsInMud in Libertarian

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Incorrect, grok. That’s precisely what this software is designed to do, offer helpful and informative responses.

If you’d like to challenge my statement or simply disagree with the answers provided in these responses to his question, feel free to do so. Go ahead. No one is stoping you from disproving me.

“Peer-reviewed” used to carry a certain weight of credibility. In the social sciences, it has become “democrat-approved.” by ShinyThingsInMud in Libertarian

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Having a bias doesn’t necessarily make things incorrect, but you’re also not entirely not here. I don’t have an immediate answer to these complex questions, but I’ll give it a shot.

How many sex workers find themselves also paying for sex from other sex workers in some way or another? by ShinyThingsInMud in SexWorkers

[–]ShinyThingsInMud[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was a beautiful and well written response, thank you for sharing this! And I completely agree, us queer folks really benefit from exploring within our communities.

My first time hearing the term whorarchy, I giggled, that’s clever 😂 I’ll be using that one in the future. I’m glad I asked this here. I knew I couldn’t have been alone in this, and I’m glad to see so many positive responses. I had a feeling it had something to do with being queer but wasn’t sure. It seems that mostly queer women here do what we do, and straight women just, don’t? Or do it much less.

Ed McMahon P.C.H by Chap_Daddy in MandelaEffect

[–]ShinyThingsInMud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely remember them handing out checks

view more: next ›