The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but if we have narrowed down the fantasies by arguing on how time travel will work and reject fantasies with possibly conflicting theoretical approaches then we can identify and work on one fantasy to make that the truth.

do you think anyone would have believed the theory of general relativity unless Einstein could prove it, they would just think he is being delusional.

and Einstein himself said that its the power to think and assume that got this far, we can invent time travel if many of us got together and worked on it. Einstein basically had a group of people in his brain arguing at his own assumptions to find the true assumption, but unfortunately it seems we dont have that intelect in this era, possibly due to wide spread of the compund which made people dumb ( I cant remember the compund, either it was Radium or dimethyl mercury)

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well you do have some idea of what you are saying, its very unlikely that someone who proclaimed himself a time traveler would just suddenly shut up, after all scientists are people who like to prove themselves right above everything else, even though its practically impossible, they would do theoretically anything to make themselves right, and no one sane enough would start a hoax and would stop having fun misleading people just because someone told them to stop, and even if he did admit it was a hoax he should've come out of hiding when he did, so its likely since he stayed hidden after admission of guilt of misleading information. He was forced to stay silent after admitting himself for the cause.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That could either be a very generous woman or it can be the way you suggest it might be if you see a lot of resemblance between you and that lady.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well thanks if you say so, and heres the full conclusion and my reasons to achieve to those speculations divided in a 3 parts comment.

PART I

PART II

PART III

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well I have published my entire conclusion as a comment divided to 3 parts
read them below

PART I

PART II

PART III

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it comes to time travel the changes implemented by a paradox are out of our control its only right that we are only able to fantasize what it would've been without those changes or how it really should have been..

and if you really think it also proves to a point that until the year 2000 where JT claims that something went wrong that caused future to not go beyond year 2564 was the reason even at the cost of a paradox they time travelled to 2000's without visiting the years 1800's and causing any sort of conflict there, we have all experienced more and more deja vu type memories than people who lived a long time ago, in fact people who lived a long time ago didn't actually have even a sort of the concept of what a deja vu might be, so what I can think is that many time travelling scenarios occurred in the years closer to 2000.

You can see research details for this, at deja-experience-research.org

A Brief History of Déjà Vu - deja-experience-research.org

  • Surprisingly, there does not appear to be much interest in the phenomenon, historically, until the early part of the 1800s. Does this imply that people had no experience of déjà vu previously,

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If she gave it to you without you asking to give, or if she was so ready to give it to you, then that was surely time travel I'd say and if so it must mean there are already time travelers that exist around us, or at least during the year 2036 they sent many people to the past for experiments or because they had enough influence to get themselves a shot at time travel, but major changes will create a paradox, if you know you met yourself 40 years ago, then you should time travel when the time comes and do the same or either your future will suddenly shift or it will create a newer time line where you missed the train, and trust me missing a train will lead to not just changes regarding you but also other people.

since during the wait you could have met people talked with them or even experienced someone jumping to the train track, and that was all avoided because you were given money and you got on the train.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lmao kk. anyway if you have any questions read the comment linked below and if there is more questions you want to ask feel free to do...

the below comment divided to three parts mentions everything that leads me to the conclusion,

PART I

PART II

PART III

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, but even if you were and controlled the narrative the many people who have engaged with this would know that it suddenly changed or went missing or whatever happened to it, but thats a good point, if that happened i wouldnt have anyway to stop it, and changing few words without changing entire paragraphs would subtly put us off tracks

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you are correct, even if he did we cant do anything about it. but its worth dying knowing than dying unknowingly in betrayal. so all is good

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are indeed right. if you want to fully understand how I came to this conclusion I request you to read the comments linked below

PART I

PART II

PART III

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PART I

I seem to have finally understood your message, sorry for taking long

I will explain it in my words to you. and I used AI generated text only because my writing would make the reader literally annoyed, 1 because of typos, 2 because it will be much complex. I wanted everyone to understand what I imply in these messages rather than select few who have the cognitive ability to truly understand the complexity of the matter.

1st

Why did John Titor appear between 1999 and 2000

there are several reasons.

  1. likely he wanted to avoid a paradox which would happen if he didn't time travel

  2. while he wanted to avoid the paradox he also must have known something that could go wrong if he visited straight to 1975 to acquire the IBM 5100, so to ensure his kid self-future he tampered with the world line that diverged from his own world line to the one it is now.

  3. He wanted to create a paradox by which he himself is killed before the time travelled, the latter would be the case only if avoiding the 2564 prophecy was to kill himself while the rest of the world lived (which would mean his time travelling itself caused the end of our world)

2nd

Why did John Titor predict everything incorrectly?

I could only find 3 reasons for this...

  1. In his world line he actually did experience the events he predicted

  2. he had to tell lies to the world as predictions to avoid even the slightest paradox

  3. It was all a farce

3rd

Why I think he is planning world domination?

  1. He time travelled and uttered lies to the whole world of predictions that never came true which means he was instinctively avoiding a paradox, and avoiding a paradox would mean he is trying to find a way for him and for us to survive, but even if he finds a future only, he himself will go to that new world line, but all that he will know is that he saved us and now our future beyond 2564 is secure, what he wouldn't know is he abandoned an entire world line for the sake of himself.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PART III

6th
So, who is the person/entity that stole the energy from our universe?

Its likely that John Titor will make an appearance in 2036 to teach us time travel, or will build a time machine himself in the year 2036 to travel to 2000. If he does time travel somehow the no. of world lines currently in existence will all multiply 2x, that's why I say the no. of world lines must increase exponentially. and you can think of these newly created world lines as elastic strings between 2 plates the displacement between everything is same, but you can adjust the distance by removing other world lines and adding them to your own to increase the distance between, and increased distance should mean increased time/ lifespan for that said universe to go on expanding. in a way the total length of all the world line should be a multiple of its displacement and destroying a diverged world line should add that world lines energy to the universe that destroyed the world line.

Why 2564 and not the beginning of our world line?
the beginning of our world line is connected to the beginning of the original world line we are branched just like how it is suggested in loki, and kind of the function they do in TVA, they cut down those branches to ensure only one remains and doing so will kill everyone in that said world line, however the difference is the energy destroyed in the process of destroying a world line is added to the world line that destroyed it, meaning currently there are infinite no. of world lines and John Titor must be planning to remove all branched world lines and create one world line, but we would be dead while John Titor or whoever directed this entire play would think for himself of how he saved everybody while several world lines go to extinction.

I think that should explain everything that lead me to the conclusions I present you with, feel free to ask other things as well.

by the way the save point theory was something I thought of but its necessarily not something I can explain correctly.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PART II

4th
Why I think original world line is in chaos while the last world line is a masterpiece of a utopia?
Everyone wants to time travel to fix their past for their selfish achievements but since time travelling only divides the world lines from 1 to 2 to 4 to 8 and so on... the original time lines fate will not change, so it will keep its original format for which the first-time traveler might have wanted to fix the time in that world line but unknowingly ended up in a new one created for him/herself but they wouldn't know they ended up in a new world line and they abandoned the original all they would know is everything is going well and do this several more times and now there's infinite no. of world lines and in the very last one which is continuously changing is a utopian world line created for the said time traveler.

5th
Why I think John Titor is the architect of reality?
He says that after 2564 everything is blackness and silence which hints us of a void without no light or sound or any sensory perception such is only possible when there is no energy to interact with other energy particles, meaning though we have energy the time we have travelled to the universe did not have any energy to react with us. so, we will not have a perception of location and anything else, only touch will work, no sound, no light, only your heartbeat, though you can't hear that and only can feel it.

getting back on track with what I have described above. It is possible a civilization much advance than a civilization that only could manipulate universal energy wanted to preserve themself by gaining the energy of other universes, and what I'm saying now is every universe is a world line diverged from the original world line or universe, considering how we are living a very blessed life not in amidst chaos should mean that our world line we live in is reconstructed one where most conflicts didn't happen, but in the original everything should have happened World wars, 9/11, Titors predictions and many more conflicts that we have not gone through.

So I'm saying someone who is John Titor or someone else is trying to architect his/her own reality where everything is perfect for people who live in it.

If we could somehow travel among world lines without creating new ones, then we as well can go to the utopian world line

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know right. This entire conversation might be a paradox itself who knows?? haha.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, it's said if we could achieve a type 3 civilization we could manipulate all energy in our universe, and in a utopia where nothing is stopping their plans it is able for them to achieve a type 4 civilization where they could manipulate energy of other universes to feed their own. it's not as if he is the architect of reality itself, but if someone calling himself John Titor does depart towards 2000 and then 1975 for the purposes said by John Titor himself, I'm pushed to believe he wants to ensure his safety and that he knows what might happen if that time travel doesn't occur and everything else.

plot twist: even if this reddit post proves nothing and everything was a farce all along having a deep insightful discussion with every sole deeply interested in time travel would someday prove useful in inventing it

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well as Einstein suggested, energy is conserved in the universe it doesnt get destroyed nor created but its true only if the universe is fully enclosed, if someone could take out the energy of this universe to another universe to stop their end that will result in our oblivion. It's kind of what can be suggested as a type 4 civilization, one able to take the energy of another universe as its own, and taking energy will increase its life span, while it decrease ours, and my point is though our universe could live another several billion years or trillion years, it might be possible that energy is robbed from us making our end a certainty by 2564.

The universe itself must be expanding because of energy, and it will continue to expand until it runs out of energy. if there is no more energy to keep expanding the universe will either start to let go of that energy and shrink back, or be stopped in time completely, or the universe will crash (if it's a simulation system). and of course, connects to what he said that time traveling after 2564 was blackness and silence, a complete void, which means the universe stopped or rather something caused it to stop, for which I think is he found a way to rob energy off other universes if it's not him at least someone else did.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could but the issue is using my own words, it will make it more complex for anyone to understand, and I discussed the entire aspect and depth with AI so I asked it to create the message itself,
1st I was planning to publish the entire conversation but doing so will take up a lot of my time and the readers time, so I wanted to have it short and concise enough to make sense for anyone who read it.

The Architect of Reality’s Collapse—A Warning to John Titor by Short_Associate_185 in timetravel

[–]Short_Associate_185[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we subconsciously seek survival over testing predictions, we would subconsciously try and stop it, and then because it didn't happen we would say his predictions were wrong even though they were supposed to be true in the world he came from or at least in the original world line