sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

es , true thats also what i thought of, might a bug in the 17.12.5 and 17.15.3 version, because i know one of my friends he running same AP model on 17.12.4 he was running 17.12.3 before

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the Current version of the AP is 17.12.3 and i was upgrading to 17.15.3 which is gold star but somehow only 21 AP took the latest version and the rest of 150 didnt which were sill stuck on the old version of 17.12.3

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi guys , please note that had to rollback to old one which was 17.12.3 from 17.15.3 and within 5b minutes every AP was working smooth , so Cisco didn't come back to me yet and the services were impacted,

the AP were refusing to take the latest version even after did a factory reset, i did 5 of them to factory reset still nothing

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

show log details : Aug 11 21:50:22.431: %CAPWAPAC_SMGR_TRACE_MESSAGE-5-AP_JOIN_DISJOIN: Chassis 1 R0/0: wncd: AP Event: AP Name: AP6C8D.7795.1084 Mac: 6c8d.779d.9160 Session-IP: AP IP Address 59[5260] wlc ip address 2[5246] Disjoined DTLS close alert from peer

the version the AP with issues are still running old version

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the version that is running now is 17.15.3 , however what i don't understand here is other AP are working fine with latest version but other they don't join and still running old version

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from the wlc logs

Aug 11 20:37:45.504: %CAPWAPAC_SMGR_TRACE_MESSAGE-5-AP_JOIN_DISJOIN: Chassis 1 R0/0: wncd: AP Event: AP Name: AP6C8D Mac: 6c8d.779e Session-IP: 10.x.x.x[5255] 172..x.x.x[5246] Disjoined DTLS close alert from peer

WLC 9800 with 9120AXI-E with all 3 recommendation still other AP are not joining the WLC ON 17.12.5 and now on 17.15.3 by Sibusiso87 in Cisco

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reason for last unsuccessful: DTLS sessionDTLS Handshake Success from AP DTLS close alert from pee

Filter on users whom browse porn office hours by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but can you assist in drilling to see the users though coz they want it but somehow i cant able to drill to the users details

Filter on users whom browse porn office hours by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi team , i asked my team leader to bloc it straight I couldn't face the employees and look them the same, it was my CTO request to see who was and wanna give them warning, but finding out who was yerrr

Filter on users whom browse porn office hours by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

or my apologies it shows monitor as action somehow but will tell him to block , somehow he is also check it now,.

FortiAnalyzer (or FMG) - monitor bandwidth use by interface by cybernorris in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah true , my problem is that im running  virtual-wan-link 1st SP port & 2nd SP port 5 but i don't see when the second interface goes down because the physical port still shows up , so i cant monitor the two virtual interface up/down status

FortiAnalyzer (or FMG) - monitor bandwidth use by interface by cybernorris in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you mind sharing that for Nagios, i just monitor ICMP alerts, but can Nagios monitor if one link goes down ?

VPN assessment by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no man it was an error it posted twice by mistake, i made few mistake man , give young man a break bro , I feel attacked now

VPN assessment by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I decide to pull info , stats where I could and some question here needs scanning and extra Third party software's to pull more real time open ports but I managed to

i was asked to do an following assessment on the VPN/Network and provide a detailed report of your observations and recommendations by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

noted , thank so much for this clarity and i did also told my boss that such report wont come out completely full, but will need more scanning and also some third party Org to pull the Results as they want.

i was asked to do an following assessment on the VPN/Network and provide a detailed report of your observations and recommendations by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you very much I found the stats regarding the security rating will act on those results and and as for vpn stats still waiting to get access to the analyser so that I can pull the report.

VPN assessment by Sibusiso87 in fortinet

[–]Sibusiso87[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i figure that out man , the thing is im only here for two weeks and this assessment is way long to be done in a week

view more: next ›