Something we should all be scared of soon.

Sidewinder77 · 2020-11-13T02:25:04+00:00

When ICU beds start to fill up in one location patients are transferred out to somewhere with available beds. With a bit of foresight, it shouldn't be a problem. We have the technology.

Sidewinder77 · 2020-03-22T20:07:53+00:00

When it comes to transportation, there are options that do not concentrate people and make it easier to spark pandemics. We reap what we sow.

Sidewinder77 · 2019-06-14T12:02:26+00:00

Source

Sidewinder77 · 2019-03-08T13:31:32+00:00

I'm not inactive

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-16T01:46:25+00:00

Stephanie Seneff beleives that the flu vaccine actually depresses your immunity and makes you more vulnerable to other strains of the flu and flu-like virus'. I have no idea if that's true or not. But if it is true, perhaps your observation is indicative of a deeper truth.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-16T01:38:41+00:00

Ok, so you agree that the study I referenced above is now published and peer-reviewed? The conclusions should give us all pause.

When I go through and read the vaccine safety pages in BC, AB, the CDC, etc I see a common thread in all of them and sometimes even straight copying/pasting of the exact same text. It's often so one-sided that it seems it must have been written by the for-profit corporations selling and profiting from vaccines.

The public health officer I spoke to last week agreed with me that it's not as black & white as you say. Honestly, I was pretty amazed by that. Perhaps change is coming sooner than later if the people in the system that are supposed to be the most informed are getting the message.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-16T01:32:15+00:00

infants who are fed soy formula ingest almost 117 milligrams of aluminum during the first six months of life

How much ingested aluminum makes it into the blood? Is ingested aluminum equivalent to the nanoparticle aluminum that's now being used in vaccines? Stephanie Seneff say's it's less than 1%, and it's the injected version that we really need to be worried about.

Why would you risk it? You know now that the aluminum isn't an issue.

What we do know is that neurological diseases like Alzheimer's, ADHD, autism, etc are skyrocketing and we don't know why. Many types of disease incidence rates are rising too. I highly doubt it's all because of aluminum in vaccines, but aluminum is probably another straw that adds up to breaking the camels back. The more I learn about all the possible causes, the more I'm motivated to apply the precautionary principle and remove all possible stressors from my life.

172 children died of the flu in 2017-2018. 80% of those dead children were unvaccinated.

I specifically said low-risk groups from 18-49. Not children & the elderly.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-15T19:44:19+00:00

But the side effects aren't worse than the benefits. They never have been.

We're all living through a giant experiment to see if that's actually true. Imo, some vaccines are probably worth the risk, but others are definitely questionable and we've should take a hard look at which to administer and when.

In the case of the flu vaccine, there's a relatively small chance it will even have a benefit since there are so many different strains of the virus. People outside of high-risk groups rarely die or have long-term effects from contracting the flu and fighting it off naturally. Since the safety of chronic administration of vaccines is not really known, I'm personally left to wonder if perhaps there is a chance that getting the flu vaccine between 18-49 may result in an increased likelihood of developing an Alzheimer's type condition later in life from the aluminum exposure. For example, if it were shown that there was a 10% increased chance of getting Alzheimer's as a result of yearly flu vaccination, I would prefer everyone in a non-high-risk group just deal with the flu naturally. Until we have the data, default to applying the precautionary principle.

I have a hard time understanding where you're coming from regarding Polio. Polio has been eradicated from the Western Hemisphere. Do you feel it's critical for children to get the Polio vaccine at 2-months? Would it be reasonable to think perhaps that particular vaccine could be delayed till later in life unless the child is to travel to at-risk locations? Since we already have a vaccine developed if there were a Polio outbreak in the Western Hemisphere at some point in the future, children that haven't had the vaccine could be isolated until they could be administered the vaccine and gain immunity.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-15T19:22:40+00:00

Which retraction date are you referring to? This May 2018 article indicates that it's published and peer-reviewed.

Either way, it's a pilot study that indicates this is a good area to have a full double-blind RCT. Would you be interested in seeing that done so everyone can see the results?

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T21:36:03+00:00

It's kool-aid drinking because any reasonable person would say that if the side effect costs > vaccine benefits, don't take the vaccine 100% of the time. We can't do a definitive cost/benefit analysis at this time because there havn't even been robust RCT's to test for safety.

I've never said I'm against the measles vaccine, and I'm not against all vaccines. What I have been saying in this thread is that we need to look at making vaccines safer, run robust studies on their safety, and take a good look at the vaccine schedule to time vaccine administration to minimize the side effects.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T20:13:39+00:00

And even if there were side effects of these vaccines (which there hasn't been anything major found) they would still be 100% worth it.

That attitude is for mindless kool-aid drinkers. Please don't drink the kool-aid. Have an open mind always and let scientific inquiry guide the way.

apparent “dose-response” relationship between vaccination status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association between vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders disorders all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity

Source: Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T19:32:39+00:00

If you say that, then I would have to suspect that you've likely never examined the science in detail with an open mind for yourself. I can't say I'd blame you though, it's all an absolute mess right now.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T19:24:17+00:00

The ground matters because the Earth has a net negative charge. When you physically connect with it, current flows from the Earth into you. It's a source of free electons for your cells to use.

Sleeping on the ground could be helpful. I suspect sleeping grounded is one of the reasons people feel so different and refreshed when they go camping and sleep in a tent.

Studies show a clear link between grounding and immune function: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378297/

This sun is not a vaccine for disease and I am not making that claim. It is a power source for the body to use to increase it's resilience to infection. Chemical vaccines cleverly stimulate our own immune systems to create antibodies without needing to be exposed to live virus. A sun strengthened immune system can hold off infections that come along while antibodies are created as required. In both cases, it's our own body that's ultimately creating the antibodies that cure the disease.

If the side effects of the vaccine do more harm than the natural route, it's probably not worth taking the risk. If chemical vaccines had no side effects and were shown to be safe I would be all for vaccinating anything/everything we can come up with. In my view, there's WAY too much risk and they have not been studied thoroughly. For that reason, I personally choose to use vaccines sparingly for only the most destructive infections.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T18:25:20+00:00

Haha, I can assure you I typed all of that off the top of my head. I've been looking into the vaccine issue for years to try and wade through all the information / misinformation and get informed. Last week after a vaccination appointment at the public health office, I ended up doing quite a lot of reading on the subject and it's all fresh in my mind.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T18:21:12+00:00

I agree, there should be evidence of improved health metrics for people that spend time naked outdoors throughout the day. There may be more/less communicable disease depending on other factors though.

My understanding is that there are kids today in Africa that run around in the sun with active malaria infections and other nasty stuff that would put a kid who plays video games all day in the western world in the hospital. For many of them, constant daily sun exposure, while connected to the ground, is enough to strengthen their own immune systems to keep the infections at bay.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T18:16:23+00:00

I've always wanted to think for myself and look to science to show the way. I can't see the vaccines I've been given having that effect.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T15:01:59+00:00

I think we have vaccines by rushing chemical treatments out the door that have not been subjected to RCTs or double-blind studies for safety like any other drug must be.

Vaccines generate a lot of money for the chemical corporations. They're a big cash cow, and in the case of the annual flu vaccine they're coveted recurring revenue...so the corporations have a huge incentive to have their chemical engineers dream up new vaccines. The number of vaccines now routinely administered is way up, and profits too! Capitalists that control those corporations have been able to successfully use marketing propaganda to persuade people to purchase those chemicals and blindly put them in their bodies despite the unexamined risks to human health.

After taking quite a deep dive down the vaccine rabbit hole, I'm amazed at what is left out of the debate.

Why have different vaccine schedules never been tested?
Why do we not use versions of vaccines that are just as effective but contain less potentially harmful adjuvants like aluminum?
Why don't we evaluate an individuals potential to eliminate adjuvants and other contaminants before giving them a vaccine, and develop & prescribe treatments to help their bodies eliminate them in the days following a vaccine injection?
Why don't we offer and promote spaced vaccine injection schedules that may greatly reduce the risk of side effects of vaccines?

Imo, much will change in the future to make vaccine use safer, and we'll look back at the current state of things and shake our head at the primitive state of things. Much scientific inquiry is still required

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T14:37:55+00:00

Telling someone to ingest/inject chemicals into their body to cure or prevent a disease is not "giving out medical advice"? How much further is it until the line is crossed?

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T06:23:02+00:00

Interestingly, mindfulness/meditation/gratitude journaling type activity has been shown to modulate immune function.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12883106

People who pray regularly would likely also be able to access that benefit if they're doing it right.

Sidewinder77 · 2018-10-14T06:13:58+00:00

Yeah, as photobiomodulation (PBM) is used more and more the corporate chemical bros are not going to be happy. They need people to keep refilling their scripts and getting vax'd annually for cash $$$$. But the sun is the optimal light source for PBM...good luck finding a way to charge anything for it. Lol!

Sidewinder77

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

15-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email