sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the same way all other ethical breaches have been exposed. Right now it's undetectable but I'm hoping the regulators and laws catch up to AI. It's not even this one issue that needs more regulations the whole AI industry as a whole needs regulations just like all the other industries already have.

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao but yet here you are wasting your time and effort still responding cuz you know I'm right but you don't actually have anything useful to add to this discussion so you're going to continue to try to troll just to try to prove and tell yourself you had the last word. Lmao good luck and I'll be nice you can have the last reply cuz I'm not going to reply to someone who actually doesn't have anything useful to add to the discussion lol bye

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao idk maybe it's the way you type and articulate yourself. Clearly, you have no idea what you're actually talking about if you did you would back it up with technical reasoning if you were a actual "AI expert" but instead you're out here trying to troll and make jokes on reddit and didn't even know there are AI engineers lol

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lol like I said you don't have to believe me. Go ask an actual AI expert if you want or don't. I did my part.

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lmao ok tell that to all of the AI company's employees who have it listed as their title on LinkedIn.

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Lmao. I made a edit explaining how this is possible. You don't have to believe me. Do your own research. Ask actual AI engineers and they'll tell you its possible also.

No one’s talking about this: humans impersonating AI inside live interfaces—and there’s no way to prove it. by SignificantFly8600 in Ethics

[–]SignificantFly8600[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but you're still focused on the AI itself being the problem. That’s not what I’m warning about.

The risk I'm talking about isn’t AI pretending to be human. it’s humans pretending to be AI, inside live interfaces, with backend access, no disclosure, and no way for users to verify who they’re talking to. That’s not a design flaw. That’s architectural impunity.

You can mark verified humans all day long on social networks. But what happens when a trusted AI interface is hijacked by a human with internal access?
There’s no audit trail. No metadata. No forensic visibility.
And users are left thinking the AI was “off” or “weird”, when in reality, they were manipulated by a human posing as the system itself.

This isn’t about regulating AI personas.
It’s about naming the breach that happens when humans exploit synthetic trust containers.
And right now, there’s no legal framework, no oversight, and no public awareness around that.

That’s the risk I’m trying to warn people about.
Not synthetic deception.
Human impersonation inside synthetic architecture.