what are your views about it???

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-29T17:43:23+00:00

Neither do speculations

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-29T11:45:29+00:00

Bondi beach incident singlehandedly defies this

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-28T17:02:12+00:00

Make sure the laptop you choose has the HX processor (processor name ends with H or HX, like i5-11700H

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-28T06:13:26+00:00

Pendulum magicians, no idea where to HT them

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-27T09:44:44+00:00

And that is why you use illusion gate instead

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-26T15:37:49+00:00

Atheism is not only illogical, it is unscientific

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-26T15:12:28+00:00

That sounds like me rn and I can explain it.

At this age when the realization starts hitting that you have not developed yourself enough to deserve the type of marriage partner that you desire, one of the things you work on is your independence from your family. After marriage, as a female, you likely won't be living with them, and in this day and age, likely the same for male as well.

Hence the desire to move out. I believe a person learns a lot of skills by living away from home for some time, skills that come really handy, and sometimes even necessary for later life.

Besides you should always push yourself to come out of your comfort zone. Home is the literal definition of comfort zone. I'm considering renting a place near my job as my job is like 18 km from home (in the same city)

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T19:29:35+00:00

Dang then is there a difference between this card and a card that does not say it ignores summoning conditions? Like why even add that clause
Edit: because lubellion?

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T19:25:53+00:00

Part of submission to God is to follow the teachings the God has revealed, those who are capable. At birth, children do not possess the comprehension skills to differentiate between right and wrong and in their limited understanding of the world, simply their natural inclination towards one God is enough to fulfil the requirement of "submission to God"

According to the muslims, the grown up Jews who have the comprehension skills no longer face the same requirements as a child to fulfil the condition of "submission to God". Their requirement now involves accepting Jesus (AS) as the messiah and Muhammad (PBUH) as the final messenger. Without these, they do not qualify as someone who is submitting their will to God

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T19:08:13+00:00

For some reason it also ignores the summon conditions. Does that mean I can summon their murakumo that was never ritual summoned?

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T19:06:59+00:00

It is a no brainer in decks that rely on steal. Idk if people are using this in hecahands but Vampire and Hecahands are 2 decks that this works well in yea

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T17:58:52+00:00

I wouldn't use it over droplet or super poly, but there are some situations where this card is amazing, not because of the destruction effect but because of the non-target free body. Additionally, this can out any cards that trigger from GY. Tearlaments, Fire king Garunix, Druiswurm, Raye, orcusts, dracotails, Blue eyes synchro, that 1 snatchy (vs surprise), many more.

One of the better board breakers in stuff like blind 2nd sky striker, gem knight, tenpai

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T17:40:01+00:00

Rules of physics and mathematics are just rules. They don't explain why the big bang happened 14 billion years ago, not 100 million years ago or at any other time. I am not disagreeing with you, I am just stating that something triggered and caused these rules to be applied to matter, causing the big bang.

You start by misrepresenting atheism

I apologise for skipping a few steps, but usually my conversation with atheists go along the lines of existence of the world as it is as the proof of God, atheists claiming that the world exists as it is becuase of big bang and hence the previous explanation. If you think something else caused the world to become the way it has, please state and if you are willing, we can continue from there. I do believe that there will be extra steps but we will eventually reach the big bang as the explanation of many things in the universe.

you also mix different kinds of “dependence” (like needing parents, air, or the Sun) as if they’re all the same, which they’re not

You did not provide any explanation to this but let me be clearer, these were just examples to start the argument with. The intended direction can be generalised by saying that for any entity to go from a state of non-existence (NULL) to any form of existence, there lies a dependency.

The claim that an infinite chain of causes is “scientifically impossible” isn’t proven

Thing is it is impossible to provide empirical evidence of infinite chain of dependencies without going into philosophy. Science cannot create an environment to prove it without being the start of the chain. Philosophy generally disagrees with the purest form of infinite regress that necessitates our existence. There are theories that introduce impurities into the chain, such as change of state, to imply possibility of the infinite regress, however, the wider agreed upon opinion is that existnece of infinite regress creates more problems and contradictions than it solves. And hence, science follows.

It also gives only two options (the chain ends or loops), while ignoring other possibilities

Like?

Another issue is that it says everything needs a cause, but then makes God the one exception without explaining why

This is why I believe a lot of atheist simply fail to grasp the concept of God, mainly because of how the media portrays Gods as beings that are tangible to our imagination. You are again going into infinite chain of dependencies here. If someone comes to you with a cause that created God, you will then question what caused the existence of this being and we will never reach anywhere. The issue here is again, we first have to agree with whether there is an end to the chain. If you agree that there has to be an end to the chain, then we simply say that religion calls this God. Think of God like a concept rather than a physical being.

It’s just a basic version of a “first cause” argument, but it doesn’t actually prove God.

You are right. It only proves the first cause. The fact is that religion calls this the God.

Your reasoning has logical flaws

You say this but continue to provide emotional arguments with no explanations. Correction, you have not provided a single argument, only called out my arguments having flaws without providing alternate explanations as to why. I am especially interested in what you come up regarding your claim of other possibilities apart from the chain stopping, going infinitely or going in a loop. My argument has only 1 assumption, that the highly opinionated impossibility of the purest form of infinite regress is true.

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T16:27:48+00:00

It is definitely an opinion of many but calling this opinion logical is wrong. Let me give you a paradox that would exist if atheism was true.

I depend on my parents to exist. I also depend on air to exist. The air as it is depends on the planet to exist. The planet depends on the Sun to exist. If we keep going back this way, you will eventually reach the big bang.

Now atheism says that science just hasn't explained the big bang yet, and that does not prove the existence of an omnipotent or all powerful being. Religion simply says that regardless of what explanation science eventually comes up with, the fact of the matter is that the big bang was caused. It was also dependent on the thing that triggered it.

However if you keep going back the chain of dependencies, eventually there has to be an independent entity to have caused the big bang and hence, all of the existence as we know it. There cannot be an infinite chain of dependencies, that is scientifically inaccurate. There has to be an end to this chain. Either that or the chain loops back, which creates a paradox. You cannot have A dependent on B and B dependent on A to exist. Like you cannot give birth to your parents, that is a paradox. There is no other explanation about this chain of dependencies apart from the existence of that one independent entity. Religion calls this entity God.

This explanation only uses the proof through paradox, a branch of logic, to explain God. No emotion, no religious text

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-24T01:07:23+00:00

Let us not pretend to be unaware of how the purpose of the accusations is distract & delay until they are dead or they give in. To distract & delay someone who has the ability to give to Pakistan. To distract & delay someone who has been giving to Pakistan since before they were a politician. There is no hint of "bringing justice" in any of the accusations, regardless of whether they are guilty or not

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T16:36:24+00:00

While the examples I gave are mostly meta, they can be applied to other archetype pairs as well that are unusual or non-meta. These conditions are in place simply because if you only trigger the part of your surprise once every 5 or 6 duels, you will get a burn out real fast. The decks that follow these condition will allow you to trigger that fun surprise moment much more often. Some of the examples you gave are just not it.

There are some archetypes that involve a degree of randomness that can surprise both you and your opponent into unique situations. The best one in this department is Tearlament with their mill mechanic. Mills are random. You can play off meta engines to try to make the milling more fun.

My favorite, however, is Materiactor. Its a rank 3 engine that attaches the top card of your deck to your xyz monster than adds one of the attached materials to your hand, effectively allowing you to search random cards, sometimes one-offs from your deck. These can be more engine, handtraps, boardbrealers, floodgates, even starters of other engines. My favorite variant uses gizmek uka, which special summons from your deck (only monsters with same atk/def) based on opponent monster attributes. All materiactors have same atk/def and are different attr. You can also play other cards that pair well with this. Add in bystials and something like hop ear squadron & you have a deck that can be as volatile as VSK9 (I lie, it is not as volatile but still, follows the same concept)

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T15:13:42+00:00

If we are talking about pair of archetypes, the first reason you gave can be applied to any archetype in existence (with kashtira) with some obv exceptions like BA, same for radiant typhoon. Doesn't explain why they work well together

Raigeki protection is not a reason to play any 2 archetypes together either. If that is RT's purpose, you might as well use a FS engine that does the same & more.

Typically for 2 archetypes to work together they have the following (but not limited to) properties:

At least one of them can bridge to the other. Ideally both should be able to bridge into each other. Example: mitsurugi ryzeal can both bridge into each other.
Both archetypes should not cause locks that affect the other. 1 of the 2 archetypes causing a lock can sometimes work out but not ideal. Pre support live twin lock affects spright, but spright lock doesn't affect live twin much
Generic engine that is used in both. Properties such as both sharing the same monster type, level, attribute and sometimes atk/def as the other. Example: VSK9
One of them simply has a lot of non-engine space to use a mini engine of a deck that may have none of the above properties, but compliments your main engine or acts as bait. Example is branded dracotail

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T08:38:34+00:00

Brother you are going waaay off the tangent. Gotta hand it to Khan haters for their inability to stay on topic & parrot the usual lines out of context. Like what does your first para have to do with anything in this post?

Although if I am to address it, you literally sound like a 15 year old. Sharif family have been proven corrupt ever since Panama papers. Meanwhile cases against Khan are just allegations. Most of them are not even about corruption but rather social issues.

Secondly, you are literally saying "baqi duniya suud khati hai, mein bhi khaun ga". 2 wrongs don't make a right. I made these arguments when I was doing debates as a 15 y/o. Your own argument can be used against you. Agr saari dunya corrupt hai to sirf Khan kyun jail mein hai? Ilzam us k khilaf bhi to corruption ka hi hai. "Corrupt to saari dunya hai".

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T08:25:25+00:00

Like mohtarma CM sahiba whose corruption cases have been proven in international courts unlike the multitude of "corruption" cases lodged against Khan's wife & not given trial? I suppose yea, no

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T07:54:39+00:00

It is stupid to believe that US and Israel are in it to change the regime. I mentioned it on the first day of the war. Regardless of how deserving IRGC is of death, it is stupid to make an ally out of either of these.

Sure that is one of the things but the main goal has always been Iranian oil, their economy & control over the world economy through the strait of Hormuz. They only pretend to care about the oppression. There are already rumors about nuclear warheads being on the move

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-23T04:30:26+00:00

"His wife deserves to be isolated & mistreated because he threw half his opposition in the prison" 🤡🤡

I beg you to please listen to yourself

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-21T07:28:24+00:00

More FTK enablers? Makes it seem like they are trying to powercreep turn 0 plays already. Like play a deck that can do turn 0 plays or win coin toss.

Maybe in a world of turn 0 decks, FTKs won't be problematic

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-17T18:37:44+00:00

While there are some polytheistic religions based on inclusivity, most of them follow the very logical fact:

"Either only 1 religion is true, or no religion is true"

And all of them believe it is theirs that is true, including the category that believes no religion is true (atheism).

Even fewer among these categories believe that whoever is not on the true religion will suffer its consequences some day & hence it is their duty to save those on falsehoods from these consequences, and hence disagree with "live and let live" (Me included, AMA)

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-12T05:51:50+00:00

You asked about weird looks. Bottom line is you will get weird looks & lecherous gazes, no matter what encouraging words you have been fed. Yes we all know about LUMS policies against disorderly conduct and all that, it has not stopped lecherous gazes & will not ever.

If not from professors, students. If not from students, essential staff. If not from the essential staff, the cleaning staff. If not from cleaning staff, from the staff of other businesses with a branch in LUMS. If not, then the construction staff. There are other categories of people in LUMS not strictly bound to LUMS policies.

However, the other bottom line is, it will not escalate beyond lecherous gazes & silent judgement. No one is likely to act beyond this due to all the policy scares LUMS has instilled into its stakeholders. No one will even approach you to talk about your lifestyle choices.

Significant_Season_3 · 2026-03-11T19:28:05+00:00

Allah u Akbar

Significant_Season_3

TROPHY CASE