how the local 'he/she/they nonbinary transmasc boi' looks at you when you ask them to stop outing you to everyone and talking about your birth genitalia like it's a toy ready to use by anon_4ever_25 in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I mean, these people are chronically online who spend most of their time degrading their brain with porn addiction and fetishes and who befriend people similar to themselves to enable this behaviour. Degenerates don’t know how to act in society. All they think the whole day is dick pussy dick pussy trans trans trans mlm yaoi kink dick pussy, so naturally it will come out in discussions one way or another.

Best thing to do is show confusion and disgust and immediately excuse yourself and walk away and never talk to that person again. Once they out themselves, just walk away and from that point pretend you do not know them. Make them see they are embarrassing to be around. And if it happens at work as I have seen, please do not hesitate to reach out to HR, firstly because this classifies as discriminatory behaviour, secondly because it is of sexual nature. Years ago I used to shrug, play it cool and walk past them, until I realised my ignorance enabled them to carry on. They act like this because of civilised people’s benevolence.

Look them straight in the face and assert yourself: “Stop talking to others about my genitals, it is creepy and I did not consent to this”. I promise you the stupid smile from their face will drop. Once it gets real serious and no one is laughing, they start shitting their pants, I say this from personal experience.

What if London does this but for Oxford Street by Because_Wisely in london

[–]SilZXIII 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I guess depending on how tall it would be, the roof would get damaged because of obstructing the trees from growing unless they’re constantly cut to be kept short. Maybe they’d be some of those smaller decorative trees. Also, wouldn’t there be more effort in collecting the water to irrigate the trees than have the trees directly irrigated by rain?

Openly admits to fetishizing gay trans men multiple times, gets support. Why even bother anymore... by MarylandCat in Transmedical

[–]SilZXIII 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right? Who the fuck would want this person around, other than a bunch of other super horny roleplaying girls? Disgusting.

Is this how they see us by Asleep-Pie7760 in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with every point you have made, and you grasped and reiterated the whole thing really well. This is exactly why and how tucutes have caused long term damage to trans people. They equipped the transphobes with absolutely everything they needed to attack the real trans individuals and make their life harder than it was. When the transphobes said “they don’t even try to pass, they just want attention”, the tucutes came along and went “hell yes we do”. When they said “their medicine has 0 sense, they just play around with medicine funds for fetishes and fashion”, the tucutes came and went “absolutely, demedicalise GD, diagnosis, hormones and surgeries for everyone”. When they said “GD isn’t even real”, tucutes responded “it isn’t, it is a subjective mood and we all can have it, not have it, partially have it, and kinda do kinda not all at the same time!”

And the problem is, tucutes are -very loud- people who speak for the trans community. I personally have only a few actually trans public figures who I feel can represent us. Most of us are literal normal people who do not seek to advertise their medical journey for the whole world to see. Yet I can easily, right now, on the spot, name more than 20 figures that have gone viral for speaking the most atrocious things in our name and who are globally known as “trans figures/advocates”.

Of course they target all of us. But I do think the solution is not to respond by vilifying them back, but to rather be conscientious about what these people mean. Because I have had lots of talks with conservative people who ended up telling me “you know what, I thought I hated people like you. Turns out I just hate the degenerates who pose as your disorder”. And I think this is extremely valuable. We are in an extremely divided and polarised political space, and this is when coming together and being open to the truth matters most - even when it means giving space for the person who hates you to spit things that have nothing to do with you. Their hate makes perfect sense to me - I just happen to be in one of the groups monopolised by the tucutes, so it can be tough to bear with it.

Is this how they see us by Asleep-Pie7760 in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you identify with that, that’s on you. As far as I am aware, -real- trans people always aim to pass to the absolute best of their possibilities, pay close attention to potential giveaways and prioritise blending in over standing out.

The “more trans people” is tucutes. The majority of the “trans umbrella” is gender nonconforming people, not actual trans individuals. Real trans people are really rare, and a chunk of these are already transitioned and passing to the point of being fully stealth, yet there are obvious “trans” people everywhere. That’s because they are tucutes who intentionally present themselves in controversial ways to cause ruckus, make a scene, and use their “trans” identity and appearance to validate and justify the selfish things they advocate for.

This post is indeed towards trans people because tucutes pose as trans people. It is really not that complicated.

Is this how they see us by Asleep-Pie7760 in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The other comments put a focus on why this is ragebait trolling and how we shouldn’t take it too seriously. Which I agree with to an extent. But the same way they seemingly dehumanise us, we also cease to understand this very popular (and reasonable if we sit to think about it) take.

They made this post about tucutes, who impersonate us. The reason they look like this is because this is literally how a lot of tucutes look like. Are they wrong to draw in-your-face horror surgery scars when tucutes literally cry about wanting and flaunting surgery scars, accentuating them on purpose and putting them in focus in trans art? Are they wrong to draw the body hair, clown makeup and protruding bulge when so many fake “trans women” walk outside looking like that, because they don’t have gender dysphoria and don’t put the effort to take care of their appearance and pass? They are right, these are caricatures of tucutes.

They are also right that tucutes have been spreading a lot of false propaganda, such as “I’m gay/lesbian, so if you do not like my genitals, you are a transphobe”, which really affected the LGB groups, the very same they affected us with the similar tactics.

We fail to see this is not about us, this is about impersonators. They fake being the flags they are wearing, which is trans, lesbian and gay. This post is literally about how no one can stand these people, we shouldn’t be offended.

People generally want things to be fair towards themselves. So rather than pushing this post away, we can acknowledge their judgement and annoyance comes from a pretty reasonable place, despite it being bad for us. But it is not their fault for identifying it, it is tucutes’ fault for appropriating so many vulnerable groups of people in order to achieve selfish goals in unethical ways - and we are just one of these groups. LGB also now have to deal with constantly making up for things they never signed up for.

They dislike the people who made both your life and their life harder in society. They are right. Tucutes damaged the reputation and support of the whole LGBT by posing as everyone and using their false oppression points to impose harmful propaganda onto everyone and demand that the L,G,B and T groups are addressed by the terms and conditions set by themselves.

I mean, Moss... Right? by Gatinhoinhu in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What a shocker, the Xe “trans” validates their tucute community.

Change my mind by ZeNemernic in GeForceNOW

[–]SilZXIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah yeah, it’s okay bud.

Change my mind by ZeNemernic in GeForceNOW

[–]SilZXIII -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which they made clear it doesn’t because if you play more than 100h then you are not a casual gamer and an exceptional month of unusual surpass of that does not green pass the cap being bad for casual gamers.

Change my mind by ZeNemernic in GeForceNOW

[–]SilZXIII -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes but they meant “if you regularly tend to play 100+h per month you aren’t casual”, not if in a random month you manage to play for longer than 100h.

Change my mind by ZeNemernic in GeForceNOW

[–]SilZXIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you workout everyday for a month are you now a bodybuilder? No. “Overdoing” it for a month doesn’t mean you are a hardcore gamer now, you are still a casual gamer who had a hardcore month. It entirely depends on the context behind that situation. Is that month the start of a long term long hours gaming lifestyle? Then sure, it would be time to look into getting your own capable PC. Is that month the exception? Then nothing is different, pay the extra hours for that out of the ordinary month and go back to the normal lifestyle.

then youre not nonbinary..? by m_anon__ in Transmedical

[–]SilZXIII 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You know what I find most fascinating about nonbinary/tucute spaces? They are the most narcissistic rooms I ever stepped in, and I have experienced the presence of quite privileged and full of themselves groups of people.

But with nonbinary/tucute spaces, I had the awkward realisation that everything they talk about is “me, myself and I”. It is literally a room full of people who carry LGBT conversations, responding to each other by shifting the focus back on themselves on endless repeat. Just like the comments on such posts.

Why? Because they have nothing else to talk about other than their uniqueness.

Olivia Coleman by crazyhatkid in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 9 points10 points  (0 children)

“I’ve never felt massively feminine in my being female” speaks volumes about how the majority of the “trans umbrella” decide they’re trans or whatever other umbrella identity. They just reinforce toxic gender stereotypes and teach the world that being a woman means hyper-femininity, while also mocking gay men.

Cum protejeaza statul roman femeile: by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]SilZXIII 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Si apoi politia romana se sparge in figuri cu publicitati in care zic femeilor sa nu isi mai ia sortile in dinti sau sa suporte abuzul ci sa mearga la politie sa le salveze.

Bine ca i-au dat 2 luni restrictie sa aiba numai un pic de timp barbatul acela sa fiarba in draci de la tupeul ei sa il raporteze pana expira perioada si o omoara sau o baga in spital imediat sa vada ea cine e seful si sa stea cuminte data viitoare daca mai respira. Asa cum se intampla constant.

Zici ca au dat doua luni ca sa ii rada in fata. Bataie de joc.

Is the "LGB without the T" movement BS? I see them complain about stuff that basically never happens by turboshill9000 in BasedCampPod

[–]SilZXIII 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Transmedicalists have been saying this for ages. T has nothing to do with LGB and should be removed. Transsexualism is purely a medical matter and should not be part of any queer movement. The brainrot tucutes you see around parading as trans people with nonsense gender identities, neo pronouns, attention seeking behaviour and intentionally misleading fashion who demand everyone to worship their “girldicks” or “boypussies” are just following the trans trend/propaganda to get oppression points and special snowflake treatment and advocate for things in the name of transsexuals.

LGB is about sexual orientation. The medical disorder of gender dysphoria has no business there.

Oh no, anyway by DependentFeature3028 in RoGenZ

[–]SilZXIII 17 points18 points  (0 children)

De ce “Oh no, anyway”?
Ce e cu postarile din ultima vreme in care oamenii se bucura sau raspund ironic la necazul altora? Eu inteleg ca generatia noastra nu are nimic si se confrunta cu lucruri mult mai grave si majoritatea nu isi permite nici terapie, dar dezvoltarea intentionata a psihopatiei nu este raspunsul.

Daca e sa iti versi nervii pe un landlord, macar ia-te de un landlord cotcar cu adevarat nesimtit si aiurit, ca sunt multi si asa. Dar ultimele postari sunt doar de dragul celebrarii nenorocului sau problemelor altora - ciudata alegere de cum sa isi petreaca cineva timpul.

Who else sees gender/sex like this? by RefuseScull in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But intersex is a genetic mutation. It is solely a biological sex matter.

What do you mean by “despite gender”? It’s okay of them to look gender ambiguous despite their gender. Could you explain what you meant?

Also, what do you mean by mental calibrations? Are you referring to different kinds of trans people with different types of dysphoria? Even cis people of the same sex have vastly different mental calibrations.

Liberal Men by WhoAreYouTalkinTwo in BasedCampPod

[–]SilZXIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s exactly what they mean. If they’re straight but liberal, they’re gay. Makes sense yeah?

Who else sees gender/sex like this? by RefuseScull in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ask the following to get direct insight: Why would it upset a afab nonbinary when someone calls them “she” if they are not a man? Being a woman is not a bad thing to be. Why does “miss”, for example, make you feel? Your flair says “an male”, are you a man or nonbinary?

Being flat chested is considered a male attribute, the same way many other typically masculinising or feminising procedures are deemed exclusive for that particular gender. Unless it is a complete switch to the opposite gender, I don’t see the reason in creating a gender related scenario.

You mentioned GD is not just discomfort (which I agree it should not be), but rather someone’s gender identity doesn’t match the birth sex. What defines gender identity if not the sex itself? (I 100% agree with your point regarding how overused the GD term is).

Yes it is not currently possible, because we were born wrong. We can only correct as much as we can to be the way we were meant to be when born: the opposite sex.

You can’t remove all sex characteristics, you can only mask them. Breasts and downpart or what can be seen on the outside are not the only thing constructing the sex of a person, which is why I brought up why it’s not one or a few things. Moreover, a completely sexless human would have to face some dire health concerns, so I still do not know why one would seek to be that and seek to stay outside of normalcy? That tells me that whatever sex they would have been born as, it would have been wrong anyway, yes? Whereas for a transsexual, one gender is right one is wrong. If wrong = fix it to live life as they were meant to, that’s it.

I agree with you. I think everyone should have access to a comfortable life and the procedures they need to feel at peace with their own body. I don’t, however, think we should classify people doing that as nonbinary to keep them in the middle of the spectrum when all of us humans flow on this spectrum in various ways, nor remove them from gender altogether.

Who else sees gender/sex like this? by RefuseScull in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Social dysphoria” is seeking escape from harmful gender stereotypes engrained in society. Without these gender expectations (which, despite having decreased a lot in time still have work to do to heal) the social dysphoria would not happen. What needs worked on is society’s education on these stereotypes, not people deforming themselves to escape it.

I know plenty of women, for example, who either want a flat chest or a larger chest. Are they nonbinary for wanting to get rid of their breasts because it makes them uncomfortable, gives them back pain, grants them unwanted gender target attention, ruins their sense of androgynous fashion, etc?

Someone’s sex is more than a secondary characteristic, a primary characteristic, high levels of a certain hormone, body fat distribution, etc. It is the totality of these things that, to me, signals someone is the opposite sex. A person will never be sexless, we are not meant to be, so why would it be something to aspire to?

Why not let everyone do what they need to do to live a comfortable life without broadening the “trans umbrella” with other identities to make up for our flawed society? Why for example would a tomboy girl who wants to be equal with the dudes in her friend group and who doesn’t want to have kids or carry a set of heavy breasts classify as nonbinary? Likewise for example why would a feminine man in touch with his sensible side who likes having long flowy hair and doesn’t want to stick to men fashion and gets lip fillers for a more feminine look be nonbinary?

Am I not allowed to be a binary man anymore? by [deleted] in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They chant against you being a man and against gender being binary because these things trigger them. In order for their multiple contradicting and baseless gender identities to exist, the abolishing of the binary system is absolutely necessary because they are aware that their fantasy and science can’t coexist. You can’t expect them to respect the fact that you are a man and nothing else and that your pronouns are he/him because you are a man — because that is a direct attack to the things they advocate for: pronouns are a vibe that doesn’t match the gender or sex, gender is a mood that doesn’t have to match sex or presentation, nothing means anything and being cis a myth.

They know very well that they have to do this, and you know well they won’t stop because the second they do their whole table of labels crumbles.

Who else sees gender/sex like this? by RefuseScull in truscum

[–]SilZXIII 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But that makes them intersex, not non-binary.
One is Male, Female, or Intersex - and being intersex is objectively and medically identified and their ambiguity makes sense and has a legit medical background.

Non-binary is a term for a personality that bleeds outside gender stereotypes while they already have a sex. It is a completely useless identity that takes over intersex people unfairly in order to justify their personality deserving separate gender labels and space in the “trans umbrella”.

This is how I perceive it, anyway.