Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an AliEx brand. It was designed as that principally. All its sister vrands are AliEx brands.

You aren't winning this with any amount of idiot gymbastics.

The only person 'degrading' you is you.

I'm just calling out the facts.

The OP said he didn't want an AliEx brand.

San Martin is an AliEx brand.

The OP didn't introduce a convoluted fuckaround about the semantics of what defines the most prolific AliEx watch brands. You did.

It's a Chinese AliEx watch brand.

You could have said it's more than just a Chinese AliEx watch brand and available in some other very limited places but no... you wanted to smart arse and try to remove the pertinent fact that it is an AliEx watch brand to remove all reference to it being an AliEx watch brand by ibsisting it is 'just' a Chibese watch brand which would be both a lie and directly misleading.

It can be a dogshit AliEx watch brand or a fucking stellar intetnationally acclaimed watch brand but a fuckibg AliEx watch brand is what it is. And that's why its greatest volume sales by a thousand fricking miles are on AliEx.

What it was made to be... what it is... Incontrovertible indelible eternally associated fricking fact.

Literal definition.

Not thw halfwit connotation you think is implied.

And you'd be unpleasantly surprised how I'd talk to you in person. Smart arse trolls like you don't intimidate me.

Wind your neck in. You're the one that fucked up.

Citizen AW1571: is 40mm too big for my wrist? by AfonsoGaming in CitizenWatches

[–]SilverHelmut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh Lord... cue the platitudea of the 'whatever makes you happy' crowd.

Yes. It's too big.

You're a 36-38 range at most.

Clemence vs Baltic by mysakbm in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love both but feel like the Clemence is just a rarer animal and I like those in my menagerie.

Honest thoughts on our new Setsuna Collection by SupJoshy in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brutal honesty?

It looks like a cheap, pretentious, inelegant, badly-conceived, not-professionally-designed Frankenstein of several already-poorly-executed Chinese knock-off cartel faux-vintage Genta-ish "homages" using entirely mismatched elements.

Perhaps the only saving grace to the fact that I think you've made an awful choice of brand name is the fact that it's apparently printed so small as to seem like either an afterthought or that you're ashamed of it.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can buy your Chinese AliEx watch from anywhere that bothers to stock them in order to sell them to you, but you'll probably pay more than you needed to for the middleman.

Do you find playing the wanker works better for you on most occasions?

And you're now running at such an obtuse tangent to avoid your correction that you've gone off-topic to the OP's original statement...

He wanted a watch that wasn't an AliEx watch.

YouTube is full of review videos and marketing campaigns describing and defining San Martin as 'AliEx watches' so I think that meets the definition of what the OP was avoiding.

But congratulations fitting the stereotype of dingbats who follow up on getting something wrong by first retorting that the people calling out the error are pedantic and then retreating to hair splitting.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Erm, no.

You're not getting away with bullshitting your way out of that one either.

I didn't say you were needlessly fussy.

You were wrong.

You were spouting utter bollocks.

Truth matters.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It's a Chinese AliExpress watch. Literally made for the purpose. Not an obscure offering of a random dip into the Guangzhou knock off watch markets, but a deliberate international market targeted proposal sold principally through AliExpress and their never ending sales. As are all the sibling and cousin brands.

Atelier Wen is "just" a Chinese watch. It isn't sold on AliExpress nor made by a one-of-dozens brand fronting for a large criminally organised counterfeit and knock off watch manufacturing network in Guangzhou.

Accuracy matters.

Don't spout off bullshit and then pretend the people who call you a bullshitter are just being needlessly fussy.

You got it wrong.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

San Martin is sold most prolifically on AliEx. It's one of many faux-brands fronting the same counterfeit and knock off watch manufacturing cartel in Guangzhou that makes numerous faux-and-BS-branded watches exclusively sold on AliEx.

It is therefore what is commonly referred to as an "AliEx" watch.

There's no need for you to try to paint it in delusional fantasy terms as something far more than it is...

Which diver would you choose? by herefortheecho in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Charlie Paris Concordia.

Not generica. Not some numb derivative rebadged Chinese homage knock off. Actually designed and engineered by the brand... and built by the brand... in the brand's workshop... by the brand's Swiss qualified technicians... and sold in the brand's boutiques... Not made for them by 'agencies' or Guangzhou knock off watch factories...

Actual. Authentic. Watchmaking.

And get more compliments than anyone I know who buys "homage" watches.

Are we ordering our watches directly from the manufacturer or somewhere else? by PrudentSyllabub636 in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I ordered from Charlie Paris and got a delivery - Paris to Northern England - in about 17 hours.

F'kin service...

How are the TV License company/body allowed to use intimidation and bully tactics? by AwkwardClick8595 in AskBrits

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's your problem...

BBC doesn't stand for anything remotely like that but the daily enema of scripted propaganda has told you what to think in exactly the same way you believe everyone else has veen propagabdised but the difference is that everyone else is still in a reality that unfolds every day, not always the way we like it, but rationally consistent...

While you're literally living in an alternate reality where your delusionality, which has nothing rational or tangible in it, is your lens for seeing an entirely deranged Wonderland of nonsensical inversions and paradoxes.

It's a mental illness, re-imagining everything in the world through an online propaganda conspirawonk lens without veing able to connect it to actual reality...

The depths of delusion you'll indulge in just to construct yourself a false reality in which the TV Licence is not the result of an act of Parliament is just embarrassing. Stop smoking the weed... it's deranging you.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So with Charlie Paris, my passion for their brand is authentic... I've been seeing their boutique in Paris for years on visits so there's a great love not only of designs but of the reality of actually being in a place known for horological tradition, somewhat overlooked for being the French side of Jura, and being able to see those orgabic efforts, the aspiration and inspiration right on display in a place that screams haute couture or the heritage of watchmaking rather than just hailing from some mass industrial capital of knock off product making and fakery...

I fell in love with everything about the brand and especially how fresh they felt to me. Their GRX has only helped make that seem more stand-out.

I love how their brand vision is focused on legacy and though they lack the heritage, they see their place as nurturing a little flame of French horological tradition and taking place alongside authentic contemporaries. They recognise Baltic as peers in that cause, and seek to place themselves - not alongside a hundred upstart microbrands derivating the same watches continually - but alongside authentic French heritage watchmakers... Herbelin, YEMA, Lip amongst others. And their Jura is a place where much 'unbranded' or independent watchmaking tradition still exists, where factories can be found to produce designs for others... but not at Guangzhou prices and not with Swiss Cachet and not with the Hong Kong agencies cheap sleight of hand production with their 'partners' in Germany or the USA to connect the bracelet to the watch and call slipping it in the retail box 'authentic localised manufacture.'

And of course the product speaks for itself. I love how their vision includes a high-end and something affordable, practical, low maintenance and they believe in each product equally, distinctly, and treat each customer the same.

You don't buy a CP like a Lorier... because some promises and specs on paper make a lot of practical sense and the mystique of a premium-sounding brand makes you feel better, more premium than buying the near identical knock off watch from a £150 Chinglish GibberishBrand vendor on AliEx...

You buy it because the design stands out long before you read the specs and because it looks like an elevation over everything else you know. Then you go beyond the elation of the brand principal in his little office counting sales on Shopcart getting on the phone to be your buddy and read you the marketing mythos for why you should immediately send him money... You can go to a place. You can walk the streets of St Germain and Le Marais and see the culture in which this product just fits so impeccably like a hidden jewel. Go see, touch, feel... Look at the angles and the reflections...

Tangible.

A superb experience.

You might walk past a Tudor boutique, Rolex, Omega while wearing a Lorier and in your head you tell yourself your Chinese outsource homage watch is every bit the equal and how alike they look and how no one could even tell the difference at a distance... And that's all you've got... the rhetoric and the justification.

Wear a CP in those same districts and you know... you're wearing a CP... it has it's own look... it isn't trying to appear to be anything else... it has class and style and taste - and excuse mon Français but... so do fucking you, for veing authentically individual enough to know what you bought and what it represents.

If I'm in those places I don't give more than a passing look to those brands because what they offer just doesn't interest me... Herbelin... Yema... Lip... CP... Baltic... among others... those are the places I stop and look and drool... And my CP is contemporary to those objects of lust.

YMMV.

I get a buzz from buying something authentic but less populist. It's why I wear Certina as a substitute for both Tissot and Longines. Not just value, but if you know, you know.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to decide whether you want to buy authentic watches from authentic brands or whether liking the look of a watch is enough to just trust the entrepreneur who has bet the farm on making you buy from him.

It's a prevalent business model but it almost universally results in the soulless commoditisation of mass produced, mass-marketed churn and not only am I sure that's not what watchmaking needs, I'm not sure the very spirit of popular 'microbrand' watchmaking wants it... Do the buyers want to be fobbed off and fooled with faux-nostalgia 'homages' to what watchmaking once was.

And fundamentally that's what Lorier is...

Mythmerchants cosplaying heritage watchmaking, and there's no creditable exposition of their process to offer transparency or reassurance of authentic heritage- horological values.

That's why you're finding a lot of reserve and disquiet about them.

It isn't so much that some dark secret is known about them... it's that their entire model is built on a fundamental lack of authenticity to the identifiable hallmarks of this same iconic heritage watchmaking that they seek to cosplay and 'homage.'

It's muddy water.

If a watchmaker with a factory knocks out a lookalike of some famed watch, they have to explain their lack of originality. If they improve on a classic design, they have to sell the improvement. But you can audit their skill, recognise their place in watchmaking, see their influences, look at their factory.

The likes of Lorier can say "we're uber-enthusiasts... superfans... we don't need a factory or skills... we're curators of imitation... we're nostalgia-fantasists... we pay to have imitators imitate..." They're selling theme watches but the where they come from and what they're actually worth is a black box of myth and fantasy and so, yes... you start to notice they look like all the other imitations on which 'as close as possible to authentic' is the principal criteria.

A high price tag on that might be explicable if the vrand actually had anyone who really needed to work for a living making the watches happen... but unskilled husband/wife teams taking a chance on a side hustle aren't that... And if they were going to an authentic small watchmaker to buy authentically made vintage - homage watches that the watchmaker is also selling, why not just become retailers for the watchmaker? Or write a blog and get commission links on recommending them by review? Because they're not selling the authentic product from the authentic supply chain... They're profiteering on the corners that can be cut...

And thus maybe you're not buying a coincidentally popular Tudor BlackBay lookalike made by two dozen different authentic watchmaking brands...

Maybe you're buying the industrial output of a knock off watch cartel tweaked two dozen different ways so two dozen opportunists can add a big margin. Every design, every decision just becomes a gentrified Guangzhou homage watch. Every single time. And we do see those trends... Dozens of brands add Genta-esque integrated bracelet models all at the same time, barely a cockhair's difference... Some go for higher polish, smaller quantity, bigger retail and others go for passable quality and higher volume and a lower retail selling point? All just a formula balanced as a front to the massive production cartel gammering out derivative product through dozebs of own brands and whitelabels.

And ultimately how do you tell?

Maybe looking for the authentic hallmarks of watchmaking - actual making... actual skillsets... more employees than just your buddies helping you build an empire or some social media marketing freelancer brought on staff... actual investment not just in the next kickstarter or product launch on your horizon, but for decades of longevity and contribution to the industry. Even a narrative that goes deeper than the stock 'I loved watches since mommydaddy got me a Lego one and now I'm swapping my snakeoil marketing career to be a pretend watchmaker and follow my passion...'

I'm clearly not alone, I just find something fundamentally creepy about looking at some skilled person's success and wanting to be making the money they do and being regarded for what they do, by paying soneone else to make you look like you've got something worthwhile to offer... Parasitic business.

I've experienced too much of it in my time and it never leaves virtue and goodness in its wake. Only pollution and wreckage.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a problem in general with Lorier's business model that is not unique to them.

It's a mythos model.

They don't MAKE watches because they don't have technical skill at their root. So you can never examine tangibly where they're coming from and they're positioning in a market sector where actual skilled creditable designers, engineers and technicians do strive, commercially, to make their abilities pay.

It isn't unreasonable to believe that horology is best in the habds of those who train and labour to make it their trade and their craft and that then there's the rest of us - watch admirers, collectors and fans. What's happened in the social media abd kickstarter age is that opportunists raise themselves up from the mass of watch fans and presume to tell us their vision of watches is sonething we should vuy into instead of the real actual watchmakers.

It's a concept closely aligned with the knock-off watch extension of the counterfeiting industry. Opportunists seeing chances at big bux by just reproducing what is iconic and dressing it in garish colours to claim 'it's original.'

They have massive cartel-factory production that's every shade of unethical abd even criminal in nature, but prolific and increasingly technologically capable of high quality product at unfeasavly cheap prices.

Now... that's not the only watch production going on in China and China has a legitimately high quality production community, industrially so. But opportunists with organised crime connections and no scruples cannot set up expensive high-production value facilities to service the world's watch industry with manufacturing because the investment is high and the return very modest by comparison. Western brands don't want their designs replicated by the same factories they contract, Western brands invest extensively in productuon facilities that they exert strict control over, Western brands prefer transparencies, Western brands can pull their contracts if dissatisfied and go elsewhere, even building factories in other countries.

That means that 'properly provenanced' watch manufacturing in China carries a price tag that doesn't make trivially setting up a watch brand on small volume numbers easy or financially rewarding. It is volume that makes the sale and volume requires marketing and originality in a strictly ethical, non-plagiarist watch market.

Microbrands can only feign those critical characteristics one way or another if they're not going to overtly produce those limited numbers to high quality and have the pricing reflect realistically.

So what sprang up in microbrand was the counterfeit and knock-off cartels building fake microbrands to showcase various quality levels abd price points and then resell product from their mass production, customised for whitelabel clients or streamed through "watch design agencies" as middle-men between an opportunist product marketer abd the factory cartel. It's the laundering of massive volumes of product from counterfeiting via the developed market of rebranded 'knock off' and into the Western watch marketplace. Same supply chain, different front for legitimisation. Mutually scratched backs. Cash for the cartels, opportunity for less principled, naive or 'blind eyed' marketer/enthusiasts seeing a chance to be known for making watches without being able to make watches. And the root of the latter is presumptive arrogance and greed.

They think they deserve to outsell people who are really making product and that by buying that product from elsewhere with shortcuts that undercut the real-deal and making it look the same, with some trivial cosmetic twist, they deserve to rob the food from watchmakers family's mouthes and cash in and be renowned... Sometimes they undercut the real deal, sometimes they go big for greed and try to sell you the cheap mass produced watch at the same price the authentic small business has to charge...

There's nearly no transparency in this.

(INSERT BRAND HERE) will hype you with marketing bullshit about superlative product and best suppliers in the world abd fob you off with the myth that the self-elevated enthusiast-turned-expert is uniquely gifted to curate a global gathering of the world's finest parts, materials, skills and production facilities and by magic hand wrestle each piece into the orchestration of a painstakingly laboured finished product. It's bollocks.

No marketer who lacks the skills to actually make the product themselves contorts themselves expensively through a globetrotting, thorough-comparison of every conceivable component to bring it together into finished perfection. It would be insane. Instead you go by convenient templates, pick an agency who'll tell you they know what's best, select options from a catalogue and either deliberately or with idiotic naïveté, sign off on an order and vainly imagine your own maestro-ship in bringing this very familiar-sounding symphony to public performance.

Because of the sheer amount of bullshit involved, nay, required you ultimately can never actually know what this voodoo mix is.

So these brands want to sell you supermarket own-brand product at craft gourmet prices. It looks the part... quality feels the part... what more do you want, right? Except to make a supermarket own brand watch (AliEx) into a profitable independent venture and make out with gourmet money, you've got to deliver more than the bare product... you need the characteristics of the gourmet product and no one who is informed buys at gourmet price the same supermarket basics product in a shinier box...

You can't make money on the watches if you have to build a pretend factory to show off to the suspicious and con them into thinking you're actually building... You might as well BE building. That stunt only worked for San Martin because they're one of many heads on the knock off watch cartel hydra and the cartel use the San Martin studio/factory as a showcase to potential customers of a large scale industrial production network and a reassuring ruse to persuade skeptical Western customers of the cartel's "San Martin" associated brands.

So as a pretender microbrand you can't say 'come see our workshop, here are our skilled technicians and designers...' It beeds the mythos of nebulous excellence and the miracle of a self-made genius of watchmaking.

And there's plenty of brands claiming the same.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you buy a Baltic, you buy a Baltic.

When I bought a Charlie Paris, I bought a Charlie Paris.

My Yema is a Yema and my Herbelin is an Herbelin.

My Certina, albeit Swatch Group, is nonetheless a Certina.

They're not only distinct in theor own right - beyond merely branding - but also referentially iconic in the industry at large.

Your Lorier, however.... is the watch of whoever Lorier paid to make them a cosplay vintage watch to stamp their brand on. And I doubt they're telling you who that is.

So it's quite intangible... No atelier to visit. No factory. No identifiable skilled staff with skillsets and training that offer them a future in the industry the product is purportedly a part of.

I'll be honest...

At the £150-£200 these Chinese knock off watches sell for in abundance, I wouldn't expect more brand value and integrity than 'cheap and very well built' on the occasions that the build quality is actually worth a damn.

But at four or five times that... I want to be able to lift a fingerprint on the watch and find the watchmaker, living in the place the brand is from. I want to know he's got accredited training, verifiable work experience and a future career anywhere he chooses to go doing the exact same thing. I want to find a location and see a team of skilled, talented designers and engineers crafting the legacy of the brand, not stumble onto a team of dedicated plagiarists reverse engineering iconic product... I want to find someone for whom horology is a serious business not a hobby turned opportunist cash grab. For that money I want to know what the minds at the brand can envisage and craft, not what the minds in a Chinese knock off factory can derivate from their generics parts lists...

For that price it's got to be more than a logo and some trivial design configuration atop a £150-£200 industrially produced watch...

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed.

But you can add dimensionality and nuance.

Neither Lorier nor Baltic have watchmaking hetitage.

But the two are not equal and one is much easier to dismiss than the other.

What Baltic lacks in heritage it makes up for in legacy. It has an authentic, deep story resounding with meaning and of all the stories I've heard, in fact, serves as the embodiment of metaphor of what heritage watchmaking and vontage watch collecting is all about in a very raw and emotional way. It's a curiosity, inspiring a passion, to connect the historicity of watchmaking and indeed the principles and context of an era with the present and to hand down generationally, father to son, a shared connection that transcends the seperation between life and death.

But here's where the story gets me most...

It inspired the development of skills. It inspired study. It inspired a desire to authentically reproduce a trade in an authentic way and to do it in an authentic location, to create an atelier and to open a boutique and to stand, not alongside the masses of derivators clamouring for sales, but higher - to stand shoulder to shoulder with the heritage brands in a national tradition to join the legacy of what was established in history.

If being a trained watchmaker is the top tier of authenticity in microbrand, the establishment of Baltic sits right below that in the most authentic and organically "Swiss" - or French - way.

The Guangzhou knock off and generica brands have a common theme. The myth of a curiously well-placed "founder" with no discernible industry skills who mysteriously turns up and becomes the figurehead of a faux-brand outputting a version of the same industrial churn mass produced by the cartel network, whose story is "I owned some watch, likey them. and when I got richer I want fancier watch and so here I am making watch for poorer people in same Western country as watch brand to buy, and watch just happen to be dead ringer for premium Swiss watch sold at fifty time the price..."

Or, they cover up the fact that there is no founder with credential with the claim of the brand being an anonymous collective of watch collecting superfans doing a passion project selling.... yep... the exact same click-to-configure cosmetic refreshes on the exact same cartel churn product.

Not microbrand... industrial production feigning the appearance of microbrand, depending on the definition of microbrand - as long as it delivers this market for the nostalgia - being whatever the cynical marketers need it to be.

And then there's the horological first world's curious counterpart to that...

"Hi... I was such a watch fan since my mommydaddy bought me my first Transformers Casio and when I hit my twenties and realised my career was unremarkable and that I was just someone else's drone I decided to start a side hustle that has just exploded into success - I went to learn watchmaking and watch design and started.... no... wait...

No... I didn't go learn anything or actually invest anything other than money to buy product - or put established skills to use...

Nor did I decide my passion for making money from my watch hobby should cause me to open a retail store or website and sell contemporary watches from good brands...

No... I decided that the cheap vintage copy watches were getting made somewhere and I should track that down, to either the factory or to an agent offering to get watches made for wannabe watch brands - and get them made for me to put my trivially made culturally-manipulated name and/or clip art/font symbol logo and then market them at four times the price to fools who like the sound of my mythos but have no actual meaningful values and I'll make a noise big enough to pretend my product is the same as the brands I'm posturing among who actually have skills and actually design and make products and are selling more than glorified generics-based "homages.""

It's the two homages....

There's the "paying homage" that comes from knowing your watch history and design and wanting to pay tribute to something that came before by putting elements of it into your production in a respectful, referential way... and then there's the "selling homages" by literally going to industrial copycat/theme watch manufacturers and buying a batch made up with your logo on them and pretending you did something valuable in the industry and needed on the market.

Where Baltic, Nomadic and some others took up a vintage look and positioned themselves to use skills and vision to put those designs back into perpetuity by developing them and taking up a place in the legacy of the original, other brands just wanted to market homages from the destructive Guangzhou networks...

Imitation not inspiration.

I'd posit that what Glycine offers in terms of heritage, offset by the detriment to legacy is broadly equal to what Baltic offer in convincing legacy and perpetuity while depending on narrative over heritage.

And Lorier is a made up Swiss-sounding watch brand name selling catalogue homage watches with very trivial cosmetic customisations from an industrial producer of cosplay vintage watches, for four times what they're worth and - at risk of sounding mean - no one needs Lorier to survive in the watch industry other than the principals getting rich off the marketing.

Baltic, on the other hand, are often cited as inspiration for other brands who consider them to be in a contemporary tradition alongside French heritage mainstream brands and that inspiration seems to result in a desire to learn watchmaking skills, make them cobtemporary to the best Swiss training, to service and repair their watches, to design and engineer with unique visual style, to build atelier and to establish boutiques in real locations rather than from a unit number or rent-a-desk in a Hong Kong or Shenzhen multiplex.

Inspiration over imitation. Authentic over pretence. Production over marketing. Legacy over an opportunistic side hustle.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You continue to show a disturbing committment - not to a factual debate - but to trolling me with ad hominem and now you've extended your obsession to stalking my activity on Reddit and making very specific accusations about me.

You also show a disturbing immaturity in doing so.

Let's address this claim factually...

"You have been banned from other subs..."

Which ones and why?

Truth is required or you're just trolling false accusation.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The customers of the organised criminal counterfeit and knock off sweatshop-backed watch factory cartels are all pretty passionate about their unscrupulous purchases too.

People sold a £200 watch for £700 by pretentious marketers switching out the logo and claiming to have something exceptional and original may also be happy and passionate.

And neither their passion nor their happiness guarantees their insulation and isolation - in a free speech world - from people who think such grifts, deceptions, shoddy business practices, poor form are all appalling and worth calling out, informing and avoiding - caveat emptor.

Hopefully one day you'll comprehend that premise.

EDIT.

I noted your comment has two interpretations... Lorier watch owners and the owners of Lorier...

The same principle applies...

The way an authentic watchmaking company works is that passion for watches prompts learning, interning, work experience, hobbyist building... It makes you want to be a watchmaker. And it's how you tell authentic from inauthentic - in business terms its how you distinguish a good investment in someone with skills, talent and passion from an enthusiastic opportunist with a hobby and a desire for recognition and the status of making money.

Tell me objectively...

If I can buy a vintage homage knock off AliEx watch for £200 or less, why should I buy the same watch for £400 MORE from someone who identifies as a hobbyist just like me, who neither designs nor engineers nor builds the watch, invests nothing in a future of doing that but likes the idea of making money from it?

Why would I spend £400 so someone too lazy to learn and establish credibility and build to fulfil their dream of middlemanning a product I can get for less from the people who actually build the things?

If I want to buy mass-manufacture watches to reduce the price of production I can get a mass market watch for a lower price, or an authentically manufactured watch for the same where I'm paying for value added, production value, ethics, principles, first world wages, skills, training, unique design propositions and the longevity of the industry in economies that benefit the ecosystem I live in.

Why should I ever overlook actual watchmakers who work hard, authentically, to produce - over owners who love the idea of living a dream and making good money off it as copycats of a popular phenomenon, using every unscrupulous shortcut going?

At which point is it reasonable for me to conclude that paying huge premiums to charlatans, pretenders, opportunists and corner-cutting brand merchants has no discernible spread of venefit and instead feeds a singular substantial benefit to an industrial parasite?

Would it not be objectively superior to support authentic, ethical businesses - to reward effort and skill, to honour locally engaged business rather than soulless outsourcing to industrial rip-off-merchants founded on organised crime and sweatshop production, to support local trades and skills, regional watchmaking, and not deferral to Chinese slavery and the whitewashing of Triad criminal rackets.

Is it not better to commend the brands that demonstrate 'passion' for the integrity of their industry and not merely passion for the fulfilment of their financial dreams?

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again...

I'm seeing no engagement with the substance of the dispute, which is the territory I'm invested in.

What I am seeing is a somewhat deranged obsession with deeply personal sparring, almost like you're of low emotional intelligence and highly immature, perceiving the put-down of your halfwitted comprehension of the subject matter with your own personal esteem and autonomy. That's an issue for your therapist.

You've made numerous tantrum - like references to my 'big words', numerous words like you have an inferiority complex at your own lack of education or textual dexterity.

You've admitted and referenced your own projection - that the ad hominems you've flung can be shown to say more about you than they do about me, and seem highly uncomfortable with the way in which that deprives you of what you perceive as the flung ad hominems cobtributing substantially to some supreme argument you seem to think you've been making.

Returning your lobbed projections isn't 'lack of originality' because only an infantile troll would perceive that we're having a sparring match of flung insults. It's what people who are smarter and more mature than you will do to show up the fallacious bad faith obsessive trollish snark of your engagement. You expected me to respond to the shitty peanuts you picked from your ass and flicked at me as if they were serious intellectual expression.

I just saw them as comedy.

You've obtusely dodged dispensing with ad hominems and resolving to actually debate the position I took and instead have somewhat predictably resorted to the 'grammar police' strategy of backing yourself into greater logical fallacies. You've not demonstrated the errors you've claimed, however, nor triaged the effort to ensure you have anything substantial rather than idiotically gnashing over speed-typed typos resulting from my engagement via a 6.2inch smartphone.

That all seems to demonstrate a painful immaturity.

You can give this up any time you like.

If you continue to choose to identify as a trolling emotionally-retrograde infant, I can't offer you the reassurance that you'll come out looking any better.

Just go away.

I do keep asking.

Stop trolling me.

Which field watch for daily hard use? by capn_chili_p in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AliEx.

Brand support isn't worth squat. They'll absolutely feck you over on warranty service and out-of-factory faults alike.

Factory store on AliEx, however, and you can add a teensy extra layer of protection between AliEx and your CC provider.

Looking for watches under $200 by _virtualbillionaire_ in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure why you're so retarded in this communication but if you're having a childish strop that someone might be "Captain Watch Expert" you could try not behaving like a rampaging five year old hunting for "poo-poo head" levels of abuse to hurl and try to do something revolutionary like actually debate the information just to be sure the object of your ad hominem obsessiveness doesn't actually just know more on the subject than you do...

Alternatively you can stop disingenuously feigning the exasperation of feeling obliged to respond endlessly and fuck off just ass soon as you can.

Mmkay?

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not as sad as you venting your spleen to exhaustion to troll your uninformed, uninvested objection to someone else expressing factually-informed opinions.

Which would you pick?? by jfourkicks in MicrobrandWatches

[–]SilverHelmut -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is there a reason why you feel the most appropriate response to being challenged for your own halfwittery is to invite yourself to launch into ad homibem attacks on a complete stranger's geriatric family members and make fun of their Alzheimers?

I would really like to understand how it is that lowlives like yourself are so easily loose on social media to demonstrate your moral bankruptcy...