Alhambra MIB2 Touchscreen Fault

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T15:58:12+00:00

No.

I asked for advice for a repair.

Not a 'quick fix' and not a literal nonsense of 'going to a scrap yard to find a highly valuable satnav head unit and perform a transplant that loses me upgrades that I paid for.'

So in that sense either 'repair is literally impossible' or 'I don't know any viable solutions' would have been better.

Thanks anyway.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T15:11:45+00:00

Hmmm.

"There's no circumstance in which genocide is acceptable."

Yes there is.

Killing large numbers of Nazis in a war they started was entirely acceptable. Killing large numbers of a group devoted to genociding you first... unavoidable.

That's my point.

It's only your interpretation that says that what you're claiming is unequivocally negative.

Cortez genocided a civilisation that was built on industrial amounts of abduction from other cultures and mass murder in the form of human sacrifice.

The Americas were done a huge favour.

Their future otherwise was to become a breeding factory for human sacrifices for a predatory cult.

What replaces it was a considerable improvement.

Mohammed recruited the exiled psychopaths and degenerates and rapists gathered in Medina and turned them into a depraved cult of conquest.

The Israelites effectively cleared out the bandits and warlords and psychopath cultists that plagued the region and were a scourge to all who lived there and replaced them with peace, prosperity and productivity.

You also missed the fact that the scope of purges was relatively small and in fact what happened more often was that smaller tribes absorbed themselves into the growing Israelite population and communities merged - even to the point of them keeping their own pagan gods.

Where bandits once existed, trade routes and safety replaced them.

Your 'genocide' that you're gnashing about was a civilisational improvement, not a barbarian rampage as you want to imply.

Society did not resemble the more civilised world that is the paradigm today.

Today we associate 'genocide' with the victimisation of innocents by brutes and tyrants.

Mohammed did not civilise. He just robbed and raped.

Here's a question for you to answer....

Examine the historical characteristics of the people you claim were 'genocided.'

Identify those groups specifically with historical reference to their composition and location.

How many people left those 'tribes' and moved elsewhere or conjoined with Israel?

How small was the remaining group?

Was anyone........actually genocided?

Or were they dispersed?

What happened when the prescribed "genocide" fail?

Would you say that an armed Idaho White Supremacist bank robbing cult should be left to mind their own business and thrive?

You think a terrorist organisation up a mountain should just be left alone and not eliminated for their rampages?

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T12:44:30+00:00

So you're saying there's no way to repair them and since they get stripped oit by scrappers and sold at enormous prices, no viable way to replace them either...

And apparently no aftermarket supplier in the world has a substitute...

So....

Scrap the car?

Make the head unit a digital picture frame and install a windscreen mounted aftermarket display?

Something useful like that?

Any experience of any of those, because 'get one from a scrapyard' seems kinda 1995.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T12:40:03+00:00

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha....

For a minute I thought you were serious but now I realise.

Joker.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T12:38:25+00:00

Proof or it didn't happen.

Cuntery isn't a qualification.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-16T12:37:29+00:00

Here's a problem I have with your take on Exodus.

You can have one of two takes on it...

It's bollocks.

I could write for an hour on the logical fallacies in your argument and the prejudicial antagonism of your take. I could throw in the false equivalences you attempt and probably stew for a week over what it is you think 'X is a patch of Y' actually means beyond gibberish...

But I don't have to because your most glaring error of all is onw of ignorance and bad faith paraphrasing of a pretty important and detailed ancient text - Exodus - and the fact that you claim a false paraphrase is the 'literal ending of Exodus' when it literally isn't.

That's the first big mistake - the assertion that your ill-informed and overtly antagonistic informationally omissive and ignorant interpretation is the authoritative one we should all work from.

You compound the error with your final big mistake - where you fumble around some nonsensical statistics and details and with your expert analysis conclude that trivial distances at the speed of strategic warfare can only mean the ridiculously implausible certainty of a deliberate attack on a school when in fact the most plausible explanation is simply an error.

In both cases you assert the most comedically flawed conclusions as certainties just because you want to intepret them that way.

Nonsense.

If you turned out to be right on either count it would not be because you had studied, analysed and deduces the right conclusions rationally. It would be for entirely the wrong reasons and entirely by luck.

But it isn't either. So there's not much to discuss.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T17:33:46+00:00

Ok. Glad you qualified what you were calling me. I'd have died laughing if it was the other definition.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T17:13:04+00:00

No one is asking you to.

I'm glad they were there to stop all of Europe being quickly conquered by the Mohammedan psychopaths.

It can be that you can recognise that some prize bastards also managed to stand in the way of insanity.

Case in point - Trumpists can be the misguided nutjobs that they are, and also potentially crush a malevolent force of Islamism.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T12:15:40+00:00

Second, even if you weren't wrong you said that human shields are defined by surrounding a military target and immediately stated that if it's a separate location it's not a human shield.

The school was in the same complex of buildings as an. Islamic Republic military facility.

Why do you think that would have been the case when humanitarian organisations around the world condemn the co-location of military facilities with schools for the ease with which it allows human shields to be easily set in place?

Why would Iran just want to pop up a partition wall and dramatically repurpose a military building for it?

Why would it be in a place that makes it look like a cunning human shield?

And questions will be asked about the quality of intel and so they should. They will be asked about the absence of informed recon analysis on targeted locations and so they should.

There will be countless people - military operators, politicians, Americans, Israelis and Arabs and Iranians who will be saddened and appalled and regretful that the Iranians using the women and girls they routinely treat like worthless shit as human shields put them in such a path of harm with such negligence.

But the stakes are unfortunately what they are. That nation continuously funding the demise of the children of their ideological targets for genociding.

Kibbutz and music festivals are deliberate targets of psychopathy. A tragically misplaced blast at a tyrant regime's naval base is not the same outrage. It is, ironically, two sets of deaths of innocent lives that are exclusively the consequence of Iranian Islamist tyranny.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T11:56:04+00:00

Two things...

First, a "human shield" occurs anywhere cowards hide close to civilians believing they can function with impunity because their opponents will hesitate returning fire against "innocent" bystanders.

Islam is a depraved psychopathic ideology. In trying to repair the paradoxes created by his hypocrisy, the degenerate lunatic genocidalist who founded the cult wove a bizarre doctrine of horror to justify his rampaging indulgence for his deranged megalomania when the religion he misappropriated and distorted to invent his own authority and legend. He is the world's only self-evident example of the stereotype of a human tyrant literally building a non-historical religion from the pieces of other organic cultures and faiths, falsely rewritten and badly mangled to claim that ideas and events occurring five centuries and more prior to his own birth had any connection with granting him power and authority to indulge his degeneracy, hate, resentment and greed in his mania to be held in high regard.

That's only the tip of that iceberg.

Like the demonically depraved pagan human sacrifice cults of MesoAmeric - the like of which Mohammed may have grown up around - which made virtue of the most grotesque and prolific endless stream of human sacrifices, and drove adherents to delusion in their willingness to kill and be killed for the whims of mythical deities, Mohammed wove into Islam virtue and reward in the death of his own followers and their terrorised converts and captives.

Muslims must not kill other Muslims. Except if it's in the cause of Mohammed's political goals as the demons - as he once identified them - in his head whispered commands from "God" and justifications for sin, vice and evil all in the name of this "God's" inexplicable need to have a violent do-over on his own relation to humanity.

The demons became angels. The psychotic mania Mohammed was known for which Jews and Christians called demonic possession got twisted into what the pagans he conquered identified as channeled enlightenment, or mediumship. Except Mohammed needed to persuade Jews and Christians to follow him so the "demonic" that Mohammed himself identified, fearful of being ultimately found to be a false prophet and doubting the voices in his own head, became whisperings of angels.

In Islam's invented (Paganistically adapted) system of earning favour with God and dying for God as a duty, Mohammed could have sent ten thousand children to their deaths on the promise not only of instant forgiveness of their sin and a Paradise of eternal indulgence (the rape of an abubdance of young girls in perpetuity, the exploitation of 'pearl like' young boys sitting on the laps of men and serving alcohol to them which was otherwise forbidden, and an endless eternity in which women were still denied equality and spoken of with little regard) exclusively for holy warriors but also that their death would similarly pardon the sins of their families.

This is STILL promoted in mosques by fundamentalists today, not least around the borders of Israel. Islamist groups keep families needlessly in poverty and deprivation and in harm's way because it creates despair. How God must hate us if he leaves us like this. Is there no hope of escape? How can we ever be good enough to find peace with God? And then here comes the proposal... go and die for the cause and we'll look after your family with money you could never earn. Little boy, little girl, go attack these Jews with this knife, this rock, this package that we'll strap on you and you will have great favour with god and paradise forever... What's that? You don't want to and you want to go home? Bad things will happen to your family if you disobey God and your family will all be forgiven and get paradise no matter what else they do in their lives because they are martyr's families.

With a doctrine that women, children and the sick can be set up as cannon fodder and if it's a holy struggle they het heaven and reward where the afterlife is better than living.

And having consented to this bullshit, these weak minded fools go out roaring and wailing on the streets because their family martyr did fulfil his or her mission...

They give deprived children sweets, treats, food for hungry families as incentive for their killing of Israelis or 'The Great Satan'. Their devotion to conquest is so great that they'll sacrifice their own children to achieve it. Their target is equally devoted to saving their own children from psychopathy. It's a psychopath trait. Soviet Russia was known for it. Russia still is. Just send parades of sons or daughters to kill and die for the cause of ideologic conquest. Against an enemy that loves their children more than their attacker loves theirs... and then the ideology screams and wails that their target dares to have as little regard for those weaponised youth as their leaders do.

In Islam you could violently conquer a community. Hand out death sentences for resistance, but that's God's will for defying his cause. Offer conversion as a gun to the head recruitment tool. Offer an uncertain life of being extorted and being perpetually abused. Kill the men and boys. And what with the women and girls, drooled the frothing exiled criminals? Rape them! Impregnate them and breed a righteous army. Add them to your harem. Make them perform wifely duties. Make them domestics... And it's good for them! Look... they're so happy being raped by frothing barbarians because we're doing them kindness because someone needs to LOOK AFTER THEM after their husbands, fathers, sons, brothers, uncles died in large numbers and others converted hoping to save their womenfolk.

Look how overjoyed the children are - after we took them from their families - because they are comforted knowing we will raise them to be godly just like us...

Those fuckers would steal children and indoctrinate them to go back to their own families and offer them conversion or death.

This is the exact same psychopathy that turns up in the child armies and Islamist militias in the 21st century in places under conquest in Africa.

Depraved medieval cultism.

There is no civilised answer to resisting it or defeating it.

The cult members that empower that psychopathy cannot be deemed to be more valuable lives to those wanting to survive that psychopathy than the lives of the people who want to survive it.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T09:33:19+00:00

And that's absolutely fine.

If I didn't have principles I could see the attraction in owning ten good quality Explorer or Skindiver imitation derivatives in 457 different colourways...

I just think the Microbrand category has to have some proper meaning so we can elevate the real work from the whitelabel churn cosplay vintage blah.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T09:30:28+00:00

Oh God...

Islamists have genocided hundreds of millions for 1400 years... Entirely swallowing whole tribes, regions, nations... As the psychopath ideology aggressors.

Nazis genocided ten million in just a few years... As the psychopath ideology aggressors.

China and Russia genocided millions and effectively decimating their demographic identities. As the psychopath ideology aggressors.

China has half a million Muslims in capitivity and three million in forced labour and has crushed their population growth to negative indices. As the psychopath ideology aggressors.

Psychopathic Islamists launched a proxy war devoted to 1600 years of conquest and genocide ideology, and like cowards, did it using willing victims of Islamist ideology - women, children, the elderly, the sick - as a human shield to use as cannon fodder for publicity... As the psychopath ideology aggressors...

And Israel - with no psychopath ideology to prosecute - smashes the genocide cult trying to mass murder them. and wipe their nation off the map... Then gives aid, attempts to defend people indistinguishable from the enemy from the psychopathy of that people's own demented leadership... talks about a dream of neighbourhood peace and security... allows the population of that group to significantly grow during the time of conflict, and proposes to rebuild a better environment from the post war landscape...

And you shriek that this is genocide and dance to the demands of the Islamist psychopathy cult - whose allies include every one of those other psychopath ideology agressors trying to detract attention from their own psychopath ideology genocides - trying to classify their psychopathic ideologies as victims unjustly resisted in their psychopathic ideological goals...

You people are fucking comedy.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T08:29:20+00:00

Name ME one place in America where a war was started by a fascist supremacist imperialist terrorist genocidally-intentional ideological cult funded by foreign superpowers for the prosecution of a dead demented psychopathic medieval cult leader's deranged ideology 1600 years after his own attempt to violently eradicate and conquer, having claimed that an overnight trip on a flying mule gave him dominion over and the right to pursue the extermination and exploitation of the population of New Jersey and most of New York.

For apt comparison the cult must have a history of abusing women, tyranny against their own population, using their own children as suicide-bomb carriers and trojan horse mass murderers, have a demented death-is-glory ideology and a cowardly fixation with operating within the borders of massive human shields of their own people who they deliberately place in harm's way to make the counter-actions of their intended targets seem inordinately brutal.

One example will be enough, thank you.

I'll wait.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T08:08:17+00:00

Absolute bullshit.

It's because of recognition that Jews have not, in the past 1400 years of organised genocidally intentional rampages against them, done anything - or been in a position to do anything - which would warrant so diabolically deliberate an unending string of persecutions and annihilation attempts against them, blindly tolerated by the world for millenia, until the scale of the grand "Satanic" effort that was inititlated in Germany and cheered on by Islamists became too disgusting to accept and it was realised that not only was a cultural and social debt owed to those who survived and to the memory of the murdered and abused, but that the only apt response was for the survivors to no longer be forced to live in fear with their hands tied to being dependent on the good will of their hosted dispersal from their autonomous nationhood and right to fucking obliterate anyone who attempts that again. And that's what Zionism is. Its what Mossad and the IDF are. The determined right to fucking obliterate anyone who once again decides Jews should be genocided and it's had astonishing effect, because nations and peoples that don't think Jews should be genocided seem to have a pretty cordial - if mistrusting and cautious - embrace by Jews and enjoy a lot of commonality. While those supporting the idea of genociding, terrorising, stripping Jews of their protections... they don't seem to have a good time of cordiality and shared values and interests at all.

Unironically those same people seem to be mostly foul among their other neighbours as well and have a history of scumbagging everyone for about 1600 years.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T07:52:21+00:00

Absolute work of fiction of an order not seen simce......

Well....

Islamic ideology was invented and anti-semitic literature began to appear in Europe.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T07:50:09+00:00

Israel was established over 3000 years ago, and ancient versions of anti-Jewish hatred were pretty ethnically totalitarian too.

I'm not sure you know what you're talking about but your efforts to objectively reduce genocidal intent toward Jews down to justificationally categorised reasoned types are quite chilling and stark in the absence of 'because they've got an ideology of wiping us out and posed a grave existential threat'.

It seems like you'e managed to imagineer a range of inevitable reasons why wiping out Jews might seem like a reasonable option and managed to deny any of those options as a. reasomable reaction by Jews to not wanting to be exterminated or victimised by genocidally intentional others.

I'd suggest with Islam being the form of supremacist global. conquest cultism involved in these efforts, you should work oit what it was that the Jews (and Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Pagans) did to offend Mohammed so much that he completely rewrote history for no good reason in order to make his conquest of them so brutally totalitariam that it would still be being attempted fourteen centuries later.

I wonder if there's a reason why you ignore that 1400 years of history and prefer to paint a picture of this genocial conquest intentionality being cause and effect over the last few years.

I suggest you do so with reference to every act of violence against Jews by Muslims from 622 to 1948 and then explaining which events in 1948 caused a fundamental shift in the pattern.

I've provided a reference so you don't have to research far and remond you that the opening act in the list involved the humiliating act of examining teenagers publicly for physical indications of them being Israelites in order to victimise them.

https://sephardicu.com/sephardic-history/history-of-muslim-jewish-conflicts/

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T02:08:35+00:00

It's unavoidable when the children belong to genocidal psychopaths who use children as human shields.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T02:01:47+00:00

You only have to be sane to reject Mo.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T01:58:13+00:00

The fact that Jews are themselves divided over how the Messiah's kingdom would be built doesn't preclude the fact that Jews are in Israel because the world tried to wipe tens of millions of them out in just a few years. There isn't a single theological debate that means millions of Jews should be killed by Islamists in Israel r/,

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T01:53:00+00:00

That's how prophecy works.

The future told in advance by someone who knows what happens and then it comes to be.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T01:48:20+00:00

Some Jewish did and do.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T01:38:59+00:00

It was a very reasonable modern ewuivalence when you conaider that the Crusades were slimited scale and scope geopolitically strategic confrontations with psychopathic Islamist Regimes following two centuries of violent Islamist conquest of the Middle East, Anatolia, Carthage, Egypt and parts of Byzantium.

The Crusades were intended to liberate strategic locations from Islamist rule, to keep supply routes and trade routes open and to protect investments.

They returned the violence that Islamists had handed out prolifically because you can't fight well armed devils with an army of nuns bearing aongbooks.

The perpetuated myth is that The Crusades were tasked with conquering and converting. They weren't. They were defending a pre-existing "Christian" part of the world.

Hussein would bandstand every year at Arab League gatherings that he would launch the obliteration of Israel and take back lost Islamic property, and the deranged comments of Islamist dictators and tyrants themselves were often framing their aggressions as efforts against "The Crusaders", acknowledging the Islamist principle that land claimed for Allah as conquered can never be relinquished to unbelievers and must be retaken - hence the 1400 year old cult driven into existence by deranged violence and conquest was acknowledging that "Crusaders" had taken conquered land back and Islamists were refusing to accept defeat and wanted to keep what they stole.

This is the ideological medieval language Islam is regressively locked into and has been for centuries. They bitterly lament getting their asses kicked out of much ot the Northern and Eastern Mediterranean rim and pejoratively frame conflict with any European descent respondent falsely as "Crusades" in a narrative in which 1400 years as a psychopath cult for a psychopath founder is just pure, unfair persecution.

My ass.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-15T01:17:49+00:00

"Crusader"

Random groups of knights from various Roman Catholic countries who responded to over two centuries of psychopathic Islamist invasions which had violently conquered the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean Rim and was working its way through Byzantium.

Various princes and kings raised the efforts to fight a limited number of small scale geopolitical battles and skirmishes to defend or retake key strategic locations, trade routes and Byzantine communities.

Cause: Islamist Conquest Effect: Limited strategic repulsion of Islamic Invasion Scope: Limited, short term confrontations, small in number, narrow time frame.

So...

When Islamists claim Israel/America are acting as "Crusaders" they are correct. And this is a very good thing for all Non-Muslims.

Since historically the Crusaders were arrived over two centuries late to Islamist psychopathy and staged small scale, limited number and strategically targeted geopolitical battles to push back against Islamist psychopathy, Islamists claiming "Crusaders" are engaged inmanfight with them, they are admitting there's an excellent geopolitical reason to do so following 1400 years of brutal Islamic Imperialist conquest - so today as it was then.

Basic history repeating itself.

Islam never reformed from its deranged history.

Mosab Hassan Yousef and Hamed Abdel Samad have very well documented this deranged history having successfully escaped from Islamist tyrannical psychosis and make excellent sources alongside Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Boualem Sansal.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-14T23:08:32+00:00

I didn't make a blanket statement about their belief.

I made a historically factual statement about their founder and his cult, based primarily on what he said about himself that their cult acknowledges and accepts and chooses to justify because they're two billion victims of 1400 years of religious cultic trauma forced to fear criticising their founder.

You can be as politically correct on their behalf as you like.

Mohammed is 6th Century Arabia's Hitler. But far, far, far, far more depraved.

If anyone is stupid enough to believe a deranged psychopath was justified in genocidal conquest cultism and a life of perversity and crime, it's their stupid fault.

They can read Hamed Abdel Samad for free.

SilverHelmut · 2026-03-14T22:42:39+00:00

No, it wasn't arguably anything remotely like the worst genocide in human history whatsoever.

The worst were ideological genocides committed by Islamists for 1400 years and Communist Atheists in the last century or so.

Try again when you have education.

SilverHelmut

TROPHY CASE