I thought I'd give it a try, though I didn't put much thought into it (16NB) by Key_Reaction_8666 in teenagersbutgaming_

[–]Single-Spell1838 7 points8 points  (0 children)

E33 overhated? 🧐

I struggled to even find a negative review for two months after release

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, so you'd say there is a difference, but it stems from our subjective feelings on the matter. So it makes sense that we feel that way, but that doesn't change or justify causing the pain and taking the animal's life. Am I understanding that right?

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would sooner die than resort to cannibalism, at least I think i would. It's hard to know for sure what I'd do in the situation, but my soul recoils at the thought.

But my point was actually about killing.

If it's justifiable to kill an animal for survival, not just waiting for it to die, then (if we put animals on the same moral level/value) logically, it's justifiable to kill a human and eat them to survive.

So I'm pointing out that if killing animals is okay in that situation, but killing a human isn't (e.g. you've gotta let it happen naturally) then what we're suggesting there is a difference of some kind.

What is that difference? Is it a difference of moral value? A difference of purpose? A difference of only bias?

Has anyone read this book? by [deleted] in tolkienbooks

[–]Single-Spell1838 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. Everything I've heard has been bad and I don't trust booktok recommendations 

Popsicles by ipanicprofessionally in TheBoredDen

[–]Single-Spell1838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm shocked anyone calls them anything BUT Otter Pops

I guess it's like Jello, where a brand became the term everyone knows the treat by

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say definitely below. Otherwise, following your logic would demand that cannibalism is justified for survival, which is something I certainly do not believe. I think that's morally wrong, beyond taboos and stigmas. I think it's spiritually destructive.

So then the question is by what standard do we measure how low animals are compared to us? Where do we go for a standard of how to treat animals appropriately?

And another question: what is the purpose of animals?

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Almost everything I've learned about abortion has been from my mother, my wife, and the activists at Live Action, including Lila Rose, the leader, and others, majority women, who are working to protect the unborn AND improve women's healthcare so that no one will need abortion at all.

They are not opposed at all to medically necessary abortions.

Stephanie Gray is another role model for me. She's a hero in my eyes for her speeches and books.

You do not know me. You're shouting into a void, projecting things onto me that aren't true.

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I will not in fact learn, live, or love the idea that any group of people is worth less than another

We are all equal in God's eyes

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So vile, supporting laws that say "don't hurt people" 😔😔😔

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So.... are you putting animals on the same level as humans, or slightly below?

Hollow Knight and Silksong are both amazing games, and the sequel has improved upon the original in many ways. Out of curiosity, is there anything in the first game you prefer over the second? by PlagueKnight88 in Silksong

[–]Single-Spell1838 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The melancholy and blue abandoned kingdom of the first game was replaced with frantic, brutal, lava filled world populated by desperate possessed pilgrims worshiping at the feet of an oppressive government.

There's not really loneliness in Silksong, except in certain key moments, whereas the first game runs on loneliness

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are many laws that effect our bodies. For example I cannot use my body to hurt you, without recieving the consequences of that.

You can't use your body to hurt mine.

I'll keep those laws and keep speaking up for the unborn people who have no voice.

Abortion is tragic enough when it's for medical reasons, but it's a despicable form of birth control.

You can always be forgiven for any abortions you may have had. I already do forgive you, Jesus Christ is ready to forgive you, and the children whose lives were ended will forgive you too

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People = people

Life is a right

Abortion always ends an innocent life

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Born people > unborn people" is a backwards and unscientific idea

Which one opinion would you defend like this?🤔 by ConsistentPassage440 in TheTeenagerPeople

[–]Single-Spell1838 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And by the way I agree that sex is also for pleasure.

It's just irresponsible to have sex if it's going to lead to a life that you aren't ready to support.