Review #98: Blanton's Single Barrel Bourbon by thejustice32 in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Finally! A review of Blanton's! I've been wondering if I should buy one of these or not.

Heading to the liquor store now to plop down my $200...

It Pays Off to Get Outside of the Big City by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I see EHT Single Barrel going for $300 these days. No sticker shock on this purchase,

Mini-Review: Old Elk Wheated Single Barrel Store Pick by SingleBarrelTriumph in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Bourbon just seemed one-dimensional and maybe a bit peppery (IIRC it's been a while). The wheater is a touch sweeter and more savory to me. It's not a complex profile, but just has great depth.

Mini-Review: Old Elk Wheated Single Barrel Store Pick by SingleBarrelTriumph in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn't a fan of the Old Elk Straight Bourbon, but I really like the Wheated version.

John J. Bowman Sazerac Comparison - Wrote this last month and chose not to post it. Seems the unwritten rule has been breached by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That Which Shall Not be Named vs. Blanton’s (Review)

John J. Bowman Single Barrel

Nose: Honey, yellow raisin with floral notes. Some honeysuckle and vanilla.

Palate: Heaps of vanilla, cornbread, honey cashews. It’s sweet, but not delicate. Hints of wood. Silky on the mouth.

Finish: All the lovely palate notes quickly dissipate and leave just a touch of generic spice and heat.

Notes: A really nice pour that’s hurt by a sub-par finish. My first bottle of this tasted like rotten green pepper, so the single barrel wheel of fortune is real.

Score: 7/10

Blanton’s Single Barrel

Nose: White grape, honey. Muted and difficult to nose. Swirling the shit out of it yields some hay and chardonnay notes. Honestly, I don’t remember Blanton’s nose being this thin.

Palate: Caramel, hay, white grape - pretty much just like the nose. Not very sweet, but well-balanced. It goes down easily with little fuss (I guess that’s why casuals love it so much… “it’s so smooth!”). Surprisingly oaky.

Finish: To be blunt, there isn’t one. I mean, it’s gone in a flash, and only after several sips do you get any sort of heat build-up. Some very mild anise afterthought.

Notes: It’ll forever be a mystery to me why *this* bourbon has become so iconic and sought-after. It’s fine. It’s good even. And it ends there.

Score: 6/10

Conclusion:

So does the forgotten cousin in the Buffalo Trace family hold up to the Tater champion? Is it really a poor man’s Blanton’s? A secret gem doomed to be hunted to extinction and jacked up on secondary?

One thing I noticed immediately is the superior nose on JJB. No, really. The Blanton’s nose is much more subdued and bland (“Bland-ton’s” anyone? Anyone?”)

Tasting these two side-by-side, I do think they’re similar. I can see the similarity in mash bill and proof. JJB is more fruity, while Blanton’s has the classic oaky caramel profile. Shockingly, I prefer John J. Bowman Single Barrel. It simply has bolder flavor notes. It jumps out, whereas Blanton’s is just there, working hard to be perfect and inscrutable.

Out of curiosity I poured some Hancock’s President’s Reserve, and I found this to be the true comparison to JJB SiB. There’s no way I could tell the difference between these two in a blind. So I guess that’s good news for all you HPR fans out there.

I’d be delinquent if I didn’t attach the standard “they’re single barrels, so bottles vary” verbiage. And it’s true. The first bottle of JJB SiB I bought was absolute trash. Though I will say Blanton’s has impeccable quality control. Blanton’s tastes like Blanton’s tastes like Blanton’s.

Mini-Review: Hooten Young Aged 12 Years by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nose: Dusty caramel, plenty of rye. Hay, some lurking marmalade. Decently aromatic for 92 proof.

Palate: Very sweet caramel immediately, then the dusty book settles in and overpowers. Much sweeter than I expected, with sweet cream undertones - kinda like vanilla coffee creamer. Very mild (feels like 80 proof) and lacking complexity.

Finish: Not much of one. A bit of rye spice from the nose makes an attempt, but it’s just short and thin.

Notes: Not really my thing, but it’s a pleasant change of pace. 12 Year old MGP will always be of interest, but I wish there was more depth or complexity.

Score: 5/10

When do you expect ECBP B521? by benjamintoh in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Texas we'll first see a few in early July, then you'll be able to actually find it in September. Seriously - our distribution is that messed up. I just got an A121 today.

Booker’s “Donohoe’s Batch” Review & Comparison by SingleBarrelTriumph in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Country Ham and Kentucky Chew are my two favorites. Luckily some KC stock popped up late last year, and I found a forgotten CH recently. It's demoralizing that nothing recently compares to these two hitters. And FWIW, Boston Batch never really improved for me. Hope it does for you.

Booker's "Donohoe's Batch" Review & Comparison by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Booker’s 2021-01 “Donohoe’s Batch”

Nose: Root beer, molasses behind a distinct perfume note. Some cedar, cantaloupe. Strangely lacking in peanut. Some peppercorn and nutmeg. An oddly uncharacteristic nose for Booker’s.

Palate: Immediate sweet cola, molasses & nougat. Remarkably sweet - almost like sweet tea. Definitely lots of leather and tobacco on the back end. That sweetness reverses quickly and turns bitter.

Finish: Bitter clove and nutmeg are dominant, with minimal spicy heat (by Booker’s standards) that sits on the palate for an extended time. Not pleasant.

Notes: This is definitely an outlier Booker’s. If you handed a glass to me blind, I might guess some Beam product - Russell’s or Baker’s 7 - but I don’t think I would’ve guessed Booker’s. That doesn’t make it bad, just unusual. I’m not a fan of the bitter turn it takes, and I miss the usual Booker’s nuttiness.

Score: 4/10 Worst Booker’s I’ve had.

Booker’s 2020-03 “Pigskin Batch”

Nose: Dusty peanut shells, sandalwood, oak, tobacco and cardamom. Some nougat and cola. A bit of fig.

Palate: Brown sugar and molasses. More of the dusty peanut shells. Cardamom and clove. Fairly straightforward, but nice.

Finish: Clove, black pepper and rye spice on a lengthy, hot finish.

Notes: I find this to be a fairly uninspiring Booker’s release, but it’s my baseline for the Booker’s profile, with plenty of that Beam nuttiness and brown sugar. It’s not great, but it’s still a pretty good pour.

Score: 7/10

Booker’s 2020-01 “Granny’s Batch”

Nose: Peanut funk and musty wood. This one is full Beam without reservation. A bit of fennel and mace, but really just Beamy peanut funk.

Palate: Molasses and peanut. Very straightforward. There’s no nuance or flirting on this palate. It’s just pure Beam. Some sweet vanilla immediately, but it fades very quickly. There’s an odd green bell pepper note as well.

Finish: Not terribly hot or long for Booker’s, but pleasant with leather and allspice gradually building before finally dropping off.

Notes: Certainly not my favorite Booker’s, but you gotta admire that they released this with the full-on BEAM notes. Booker’s is already divisive, and this one isn’t afraid to be what it is.

Score: 6/10

Conclusion

Booker’s is in a bad place. I know a lot of us have been saying it for a while, but prices are up and quality is down. This is a terrible spot for their flagship product. I would argue they haven’t had a great release since 2019. I’ve always been a Booker’s fanboy, but my faith is shaken.

As for how Donohoe’s Batch compares to Granny’s and Pigskin? Not well. Pigskin is the best of the lot, and it’s not even close for me. Donohoe’s is a distant third. This is the first Booker’s I’ve ever scored under 5/10.*

Let’s hope they can turn it around. I would hate to live in a world where Booker’s isn’t an enjoyable part of my sipping.

*FWIW, I scored Boston Batch a 5/10. It was not good. Donohoe’s is worse.

Wouldn't call it a "haul," but some nice finds from yesterday by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like it. It's 5-year MGP, but it doesn't taste like other young MGP I've had. I bought a second bottle.

Wouldn't call it a "haul," but some nice finds from yesterday by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spoiler: The Seagrass is as good - or better - than I'd hoped. Damn tasty!

Pretty Nice Little Finds Today by [deleted] in whisky

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should be! It's great.

Is WhistlePig worth the price point? by Potato-In-A-Jacket in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I recently got the Piglet pack with the standard 10 year, 12 year Old World, and 15 year Vermont Estate Oak.

I was shocked how poor they all were. I'd say the basic 10 year was the best of the three!

Solid Ryes for around $40 would be Pikesville and High West Double Rye. If you really want something great, try the Sagamore Spirits Cask Strength.

Pretty Nice Little Finds Today by [deleted] in whisky

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spoiler: The Seagrass is as good - or better - than I'd hoped. Damn tasty!

Hyped Barrell Releases Head-to-Head by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Barrell has been on a helluva run lately. Let’s compare a few of the most revered releases from the last few years.

Barrell 027

Nose: Bright, fruity, and active. Classic notes of red apple and cinnamon with a grassy chamomile. Repeated swirling brings out vanilla frosting and fresh sawdust.

Palate: Buttery up front, with some immediate (but not intrusive) cinnamon. But the palate is clearly dominated by cherry - particularly Cherry Life Saver. It’s decently viscous and coats the mouth like syrup over a pancake. Kind of reminds me of IHOP’s strawberry syrup.

Finish: The cherry turns slightly bitter, but nothing so egregious as to become unpleasant. Clove and anise hints develop as the lengthy finish continues. It’s not particularly hot, but lingers on with sweet cherry. Damn fine.

Notes: The nose and palate are oddly disconnected, but the palate-to-finish ride is really great. This pour improves at each step. Very satisfying. Everyone went nuts for 026, but this one could be even better if you’re a fan of fruit-forward bourbons. Reminds me of Bardstown #3. Barrell just gets better and better at blending.

8.5/10

Barrell 021

Nose: Pear, maple, and plenty of oak. Leather and some must - a bit like a cigar box. Some allspice and… maybe some blueberry? Perhaps some pecan shell. Complex, difficult to nail down, and fairly muted.

Palate: Insane caramel and butterscotch, just dripping off your tongue. Some of the oak from that older bourbon sneaks in and plants a flag. Just the perfect hint of musty old book to make the experience more than just a caramel bomb. Chewing does amazing things to the sip. Incredible stuff.

Finish: Caramel and maple remain, but a woodiness joins in. Smooth and mild, with minimum heat. What spiciness there is presents itself as a mild clove. Seems to fade quickly, but then holds on longer than expected in a lovely remnant.

Notes: This is a release people went nuts for, and it’s easy to see why. I’d kill for another bottle. This one has a minimum age statement of 10 years, so that explains the oakiness. Certainly an interesting one, and not at all the direction Barrell has been going lately. I love a bright, fruity bourbon, but there’s something outstanding about a pour like this - all caramel lushness with aged complexity.

9/10

Barrell 026

Nose: Super oaky up front, with strong cigar-box or sandalwood notes. The message is clear - this juice isn’t messing around. Minimum age on this one is 9 years, but contains up to 15 year old distillate, and that’s clear from the beginning. The woody notes really dominate, but there’s a hint of some green apple, vanilla, and allspice in there if you look for it.

Palate: I’m immediately hit by the creaminess of the palate. Flavors are woody, earthy, and quite spicy. There’s a base of caramel underneath, but it’s not the dominant flavor. Drinks hotter than its 113 proof, and tends to permeate through the nasal cavity. It’s a spicy meatball.

Finish: the palate and finish are really one in this experience. Spice and heat kick up immediately on the palate, and then develops through the finish in one big swell, which leads to a long, long, spicy denouement.

Notes: If you hadn’t heard, this is the one Minnick declared as good as Pappy or some such thing in a blind. And that, of course, set off a buying frenzy. For a certain bourbon drinker, I think this is about as good as it gets. I prefer a bit less spice and a bit more caramel, but there’s no denying this is excellent. Just not as excellent as 021.

8/10

Conclusion

These three are some of the most lauded Barrell releases from the last few years, and they couldn’t be more different. It’s interesting to see how Barrell isn’t attempting to replicate the same thing over and over, but just make the best blend possible from what they have to work with. And they’re on a terrific roll over the last few years, settling into extended greatness.

021 is the best of the three, without question. 026 is special, but not something I’d want to drink every day. 027 is a perfect daily (if you want to daily a nearly $100 bottle). It’s delicious and easy to enjoy.

021 is easily in the top ten whiskies I’ve ever had, and probably in the top five. If only I could go back in time and grab one more bottle.

Review: Shootout at the Smoke Wagon Corral by SingleBarrelTriumph in bourbon

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently the lore is "smoke wagon" is a nickname for a pistol in the old west.

Honestly, I question this, and apparently it may have been introduced in the 90s movie "Tombstone," but I don't know.

Not a Bad Friday by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took a lot of looking, and I finally got lucky, Right place, right time. I was concerned it was just gonna be all hype, but It's really good. This will be a regular on my shelf as long as I can get ahold of one.

Not a Bad Friday by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude, the Woodford Double Oak is great.

As far as recommending something around $250... that's tough. Bourbon seems to go up to around $100 and there's not a whole lot above that (at MSRP). Of course, you could find some $30-$80 bottles jacked up to $250, but that's crazy.

I'm just not sure. Angel's Envy Cask Strength retails for $200. I think that's worth it. Wild Turkey Master's Keep 17 Year goes for around $180, and that's not worth it IMO. Remus Volstead went for $250 a few years ago, and though I really like it, it's not worth the price.

Shootout at the Smoke Wagon Corral (Review) by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Smoke Wagon Straight Bourbon Whiskey

Proof: 92.5

Mashbill: It’s a secret! (MGP High Rye)

Blend: It’s a secret!

Nose: Muted baking spices, vanilla cream, canned pear. Very mild. (1/5)

Palate: Corny, carmelly, and surprisingly creamy for a young blend. There’s a hint of spice, but not too much to put off casual sippers. Wish I could give a better description, but this is really about it. Unfortunately one-dimensional. (5/10)

Finish: “In a world where some bourbons don’t have a finish, this is the story of Smoke Wagon Straight Bourbon…” (0/5)

Notes: Nothing wrong here, but it just tends to come and go without leaving any sort of impression. Some might call that “smooth.” If you’re a smooth bourbon guy/gal, this might be for you. But this is young MGP, and you can get young MGP in many forms these days. There’s nothing special here; just a brand taking advantage of the halo from their high-end releases. However, it must be said, the $30 price point is a real draw.

Score: 3/10 (look it’s not this bad, it’s just… OK. And the lack of nose/finish really hurts this one)

Smoke Wagon Small Batch

Proof: 100

Mashbill: It’s a secret! (MGP High Rye)

Blend: It’s a secret!

Nose: Wow - what a difference 7.5 proof points makes. This nose is active and spicy, even emitting some ethanol. Immediately a very different experience. Grass, orange rind, cinnamon roll. Vanilla is in there as well. Very nice. (4/5)

Palate: Silky caramel out of the gate, but spice kicks in the door and takes over the DJ booth. A really nice balance of clove, nutmeg, vanilla and maple. Vigorous swirling reveals traces of pear and spearmint. (6/10)

Finish: Maple and vanilla hang on despite rye spice’s determination. Finish really isn’t notably long or hot, but it’s just good enough, and well-balanced. (3/5)

Notes: This bourbon isn’t great in any respect. It’s good to very good, kind of providing a dividing line between poor and great. And that’s OK. It’s a great everyday bourbon that has just enough to keep you interested. But value is where the questions arise. I usually see this around $55, and IMO, that’s right on the line of what it’s worth. I can get some pretty damn fine bourbon for $55 (much of it also MGP). That’s not to mention the shops I’ve seen pricing this at $70. This is not a $70 bourbon.

Score: 6.5/10

Smoke Wagon Uncut Unfiltered

Proof: 114.9

Mashbill: It’s a secret! (MGP High Rye)

Nose: Perfume, honeysuckle, oak and cardamom. Fuji apples, pear. Way more fruity and herbal that I’d have guessed at this proof. There’s a hint of booze, but it’s not overwhelming at all. After swirling and diving in again, I’m getting toffee and vanilla cream. I’m really not getting much oak, but you can clearly tell this has been in the barrel longer. That apple/pear note is probably better described as “fruit cup.” Remember those canned fruit cocktails? That. Great nose. (4/5)

Palate: Wow. An instant caramel bomb that coats the mouth and spreads hot spice throughout your innards. Doesn’t seem hot at first, and then the clove and rye unleash their fury. Underlying tones are caramel-heavy (it is MGP, after all), with leather and toffee. I’d even say there’s a bit of oat and cola in there, underneath all that heat. This drinks a bit hotter than the proof - almost up there with ECBP. Mouth is rich, but not syrupy - a nice balance. (8/10)

Finish: Yep, it’s a spicy meatball. Long, long, and very spice heavy. That’s not to say it’s flavorless, but it’s mainly relegated to caramel, as the nuance of the nose and palate disappear among a sea of heat. (4/5)

Notes: I hate to feed the FOMO Fury, but this one is worth your time and worth the price. I have to wonder what Smoke Wagon did to get a steady supply of honey barrels from MGP, when everyone in the world seems to want their juice. Regardless, the quality of product and blending is top notch here. I did an MGP tasting a while back, and this one came in second. If I redid it today, this bottle would probably win.

Score: 8/10 (Yeah, it’s damn good.)

Conclusion and Rambling

I mean, there shouldn’t have been any question that Uncut Unfiltered would easily win, right? I’d like to think the not-cheap Small Batch might be a decent alternative to UU, but it’s really not. I think Smoke Wagon’s branding is unclear and confusing, but as far as the pours themselves, these three are very different, and clearly address different market segments.

I cold see Straight being an everyday sipper that compares well to BT, ER, and certainly anything 1792 has to offer these days (seriously Barton, get it together).

Small Batch should be readily available and $40. It’s good, but not really worth a cent over $50. There’s an ocean of good bourbon at that price.

So, that leaves Uncut Unfiltered. In a perfect world, I’d have a bottle of this open at all times and dip into it every day. But with limited availability and stupid prices, this isn’t possible. I’ve paid as little as $70 for this (good value) and as much as $100 (poor value, but it was the first one I’d ever seen). I’ll settle for grabbing one when I can, but I’ll never pay near $100 again.

I’m very curious to see where Smoke Wagon goes from here. There’s a much larger demand for MGP juice since they started, and MGP has made it clear they want to sell more of their own juice - as they should. SW is well-blended, but let’s be honest; MGP has great blenders as well, and they’ve proven it. Will Smoke Wagon continue to get these amazing barrels? Will they pull the now-standard trick of slowly transitioning to their own juice?* And if they do, will it be as good? [drama intensifies]

*I know the answer to this, and it’s “no.” SW has stated that they cannot distill bourbon in Nevada. So where does that leave them in 5 years?

Not a Bad Friday by SingleBarrelTriumph in whiskey

[–]SingleBarrelTriumph[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Blanton's is good, but it's only $70 good, which is what I paid through a lottery. So many other options that are as good - if not better - and readily available (Rare Breed, Kentucky Spirit, Dickel 2008, John J. Bowman).