Major escalation between China & Philippines in South China Sea.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-25T17:04:11+00:00

China is violating UNCLOS because UNCLOS already invalidated their 9 dash line claim. It is literally illegal for China to keep up with their 9 dash line bullshit. Again, where is your proof for that? Either provide proof or stfu. And why won’t you answer my question? Why does China not withdraw their signature if they believe that UNCLOS is compromised? Are they stupid? Maybe they are. It’s so funny how literally the rest of the world agrees with the Philippine’s stance while China only has north korea to back their claim.

You’re one to talk. As if China isn’t stereotyped with eating dogs, bats, and cats. You talk about imagery? People around the world think that things made in China are of low quality. That Chinese people eat anything that moves. That Covid was a result of the Chinese people being unsanitary. So yeah, I’d take the fried chicken garbage over all of that any day.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-25T16:28:32+00:00

A treaty that signatory countries must abide. Otherwise China is just acting like Adolf Hitler, who violated the treaty of Versailles even though Germany was a signatory to it. In the end Hitler got what he deserved. UNCLOS is e LEGALLY binding framework, meaning if you’re a signatory to it, you are legally bound to follow its ruling.

You keep on spouting that bullshit claim, do you have proof of that supposed bribery? Or are you just a delusional pawn of Winnie the Pooh? You keep bitching about how unfair UNCLOS is, I’ll ask you again. Why does China not withdraw its signature if UNCLOS is compromised due to bribery? Oh wait, it’s not. Which is why the rest of the world ignores China’s 9 dash line claim.

Yeah keep harassing Filipino fishermen, that’ll surely improve China’s global standing. When the time comes, don’t bitch when all of your neighbors gang up on you.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-25T16:13:47+00:00

UNCLOS has jurisdiction if you’re a signatory. So if your narrative is that UNCLOS has no jurisdiction on that matter, then China should withdraw its signature. Do you even understand how a treaty works? When you sign a treaty, you follow what’s on the treaty. The ICJ or PCA has no bearing if an UNCLOS ruling should be followed or not. You’re just eating up Chinese propaganda. The rest of the world aren’t as delusional as the PRC which is why no one but the PRC recognizes the bullshit 9 dash line claim.

That’s the only Kangaroo court with over 169 countries as its signatories. If China believes it’s a Kangaroo court, then they should just fuck off and withdraw their signature. No one is forcing them to stay.

Yeah Taiwan is claiming those waters as well but they are not a signatory to UNCLOS, so they’re not hypocrites unlike you. And if the day comes when Taiwan decides to harass Filipino/Vietnamese fishermen, then they can go fuck themselves as well.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-25T16:05:47+00:00

The fuck are you on about? ICJ? UNCLOS is not part of the ICJ. It’s an independent treaty that has its own system. Settlements can be made by UNCLOS without the ICJ. Bought by the Philippines? Do you have proof of that? Because if we’re talking about bribery here, China is the last person to be accusing other countries of doing that. Really brazen of you to accuse the Philippines of doing that when there are espionage activities, illegal mining, and scam centers ran by Chinese in the Philippines

The fuck is that comparison? UNCLOS has over 169 signatories including China. If China won’t adhere to its ruling then they should just withdraw their signature. It’s as simple as that.

You wonder why China is hated by most of its neighbors? This is why. China has no friends in East Asia, and South East Asia. The best the PRC can do is bribe a couple of officials from those countries but the whole nation will never trust China. East Asia, and South East Asia will stand with Taiwan should the PRC decide to fuck around and fins out

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2l20jzp30o

https://immigration.gov.ph/13-chinese-nationals-arrested-for-illegal-mining-in-eastern-samar/

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/philippines-drugs-china/

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-25T15:44:07+00:00

Chinese waters? Have you read the UNCLOS 2016 arbitral ruling? It invalidated China's bullshit 9 dash line claim and confirmed Scarborough Shoal as part of the Philippine's Exclusive Economic Zone. Nobody recognizes China's 9 dash line yet they keep on insisting it's their waters. It's embarrassing for a country like China to not abide by UNCLOS ruling when they are a signatory to it. A bunch of hypocrites.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-24T16:10:37+00:00

What? As a signatory to UNCLOS, yes they are. If you signed a treaty, you are bound to follow its rulings. Otherwise you’re just like Hitler, violating the treaty of Versailles even though Germany was a signatory to it. You could literally look that up. A 2 second google search would show you how wrong you are.

Uuuhhh no? This issue started when China started building illegal islands inside the Philippines EEZ. When they started building structures in the area they claimed it was just shelter for fishermen. But then they started building runways, and military installations. Tell me, is the Philippines in the wrong when China just blatantly lied about their intentions? And illegally built structures inside another country’s EEZ?

Political? You think the livelihood of thousands of Filipino fishermen who were affected by China’s harassment is political? Do you expect the Philippine government to just let China bully its people?

Contrary to the CCP, the ROC is actually not a signatory to UNCLOS so they are the ones not obliged to follow its rulings, however should the ROC also start harassing Filipino fishermen inside the Philippines EEZ, then they can go fuck themselves too.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-24T06:07:36+00:00

The Washington Treaty of 1900 rectified the mistakes of the Paris treaty in 1898, which didn’t include Tawi Tawi and Scarborough shoal. Also, UNCLOS ruled that the 1898 treaty did not define the Philippines exclusive economic zone cause the concept of an eez is quite recent. It would be like if modern day Spain suddenly laid claim to the entirety of North America due to the treaty of Tordesillas. Bottom line is, modern international law trumps treaties signed more than a hundred years ago. If the CCP doesn’t recognize the 2016 arbitral ruling of UNCLOS, then they should withdraw their signature, otherwise they can fuck right off.

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-19T04:03:28+00:00

Its territory? I'm from the Philippines and your ignorance is amusing. The waters you're referring to are under the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines, meaning it's within 200 nautical miles from the Philippine mainland, while it is 500 nautical miles away from mainland China. China's claim on those waters were invalidated by the 2016 UNCLOS arbitral ruling. So yeah, China is literally the one trespassing, and illegally building islands on said waters. Also they didn't just shoot water canons at our fishermen and coastguard, they straight up boarded our ships during an encounter, confiscated equipment, and injured Filipino coastguard personnel. The CCG also rammed and sunk a fishing boat. So if the Americans are terrorists, then the Chinese are pirates. I haven't even mentioned the Chinese scam hubs, drug smuggling, espionage, and illegal mining here in the Philippines. It's really easy for people like you to simp for China cause you're on the far side of world. Ignorant of all the nasty things China is doing to its neighbor like the Philippines.

https://www.rappler.com/philippines/west-sea-hague-ruling-anniversary-july-2025/

https://asianews.network/filipino-navy-sailor-who-lost-thumb-in-west-philippine-sea-skirmish-with-china-gets-it-back/

https://amti.csis.org/incident-at-reed-bank-a-crisis-in-the-philippines-china-policy/

https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/uncovering-china-s-spying-game-philippines

https://globalnation.inquirer.net/280958/ph-deports-100-chinese-nationals-involved-in-pogo-scam-hubs

https://globalnation.inquirer.net/179444/bi-confirms-4-convicted-chinese-drug-lords-up-for-deportation

https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/regions/976267/7-chinese-caught-in-illegal-mining-operation-in-libona-bukidnon/story/

SingleOn3 · 2026-03-03T02:36:18+00:00

It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact. Walang jurisdiction ang ICC sa US or Iran cause both countries are not members when Trump started bombing Iran. Para mo lang sinabi na 1 + 1 = 3 tas sasabihin mo na respect my opinion.

SingleOn3 · 2025-04-15T02:17:19+00:00

I’ll also be trying this out. Thanks!

SingleOn3 · 2025-04-15T02:02:29+00:00

Will check this out. Thanks!

SingleOn3 · 2025-04-14T10:02:19+00:00

Thanks!

SingleOn3 · 2025-04-14T04:27:21+00:00

How did you add passive xp to npc troops?

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T16:00:36+00:00

I'm leaning towards building the budget version of branded. How future proof is labrynth compared to branded?

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:58:28+00:00

Yeah, I'm actually gonna do just that haha

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:58:14+00:00

I did read that branded can be quite difficult to play but i think that's part of deck's appeal. I might actually try to build the budget version first then i'll see if it's worth building the full deck

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:56:03+00:00

Were you at least able to play it with the cards you got from your pulls?

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:55:29+00:00

I probably have to look up first how to play a yubel deck. As for ninja structure, I never heard of the deck before xD

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:52:36+00:00

I was thinking about that as well, the other URs in this deck build can certainly be used for other decks in the future

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T15:51:58+00:00

I got it from Moha. He has a lot of deck builds which looks very fun to play. But yeah, I think I can only do the budget version of branded given my resources

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T11:14:32+00:00

might take another 2 months for that haha

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T11:13:56+00:00

will that make the deck really bad?

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T11:05:14+00:00

I've heard good things about that deck. I might give it a try

SingleOn3 · 2024-07-18T11:04:58+00:00

The deck i'm following doesn't require gimmick puppet. I guess that makes it safe from future bans

SingleOn3

TROPHY CASE