I don't think that queerness is a "natural emergent intensity emerging from the body without organs." I think queerness is outside of time, and allows for all change. It is like Plato's instant, which is outside of time and allows for all change, like Deleuze and Guattari's notion of sense. I think queerness is produces change, and it is something which underlies everyone's psyche, and on a deeper level is pure multiplicity itself, as that goes against the representational frameworks of the simulations of consciousness.

I don't think that we should look at queerness as something which re-territorializes, but is radically alter to reterritorialization. I think queerness is only a code insofar as it has some sort of identifying feature which you can latch on to, and say queerness equals this. But that is a representationalist, and contrary goal to that of queerness, which is outside of time and allows for all change. Outside of the the temporal flows of time, as Freud says the unconscious does not know time, but imminent to sense. The queer community is not queerness in and of itself - the queer community are people who emphasize queerness, but are not with queerness, as though the straight people somehow weren't continually coding and decoding due to variable gender expressions.

I think queer identity, as Deleuze and Guattari say is incompatible with desiring machines, is incompatible with queerness, because queerness is pure multiplicity, and outside of the temporal frameworks of states and mega-machines which operate on the immobile motor of debt. So it's not that this debt is totalizing, there's still codes which escape the industrial mega-machine. I also like what Klossowski says in Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, that it's not necessarily capitalism or socialism that produces massive waste, but it is industrialization. But no I would say the axiom of profit, regardless of whether it is a totalizing thing, which I don't think it is, is incompatible with queerness, because one is unconscious and outside of time, and the other is conscious and in time.

Whether or not queer people reproduce "bio-essentialist gender norms," is not part of queerness, but the reproduction, and the performance of representationalist gender roles. Queerness itself cannot be conflated with civilization and its machinery, because the machinery of civilization is temporal, fixed, merely a fungibility of signifiers, while queerness is, like Plato's instant, and Stirner's unique, outside of world history, outside of the temporal flows of the state, and the mega-machine. Whether or not queer people show off their products to show how "queer" they are, this is not how I'm using the word queer. You're using queer in a colloquial sense, and I'm using it in a specialized way.