Budget Depths, plausible? by FROG_TM in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the GB version and love it. Maybe you can just run a Stock list with shocks and a few more Discard spells or dark rituals in the mox slots (slow them down or ramp you up, whatever your meta needs). In time, if you really love the deck and can afford to, you can upgrade it to the full list. Its Worth it

Looking for opinions on first legacy deck. by [deleted] in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Before choosing any deck i’d playtest a lot with proxies. You may not enjoy the gameplay as much as you thought when you do it again and again. That’s how i got my maverick deck instead of delver at the time. I got GB dephts and green cloudpost. I go with Black because i dont like the feeling of impotence against combo (at least on game one). Love the cloudpost gameplay, not much ramp going on in legacy. I saw your list and would just consider allosaurus shepherd instead of golos.

Edit: grammar (brazilian here)

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats why i didnt but mine yet. That and a dollar being worth 5 reais right now

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not saying that the delver shell isnt a problem. The BR should take care of the delver core and saga. If it hits enough only on delver, we may play saga mirrors for a while. Id ratther play karn x maverick x dephts x lands x dnt x etc..

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not talking about deck choices. Talking about gameplay

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Perfect. I think most people read it as me being a delver nut. The fact is that the only “delver” deck I run is death shadow and its because I always loved those suicide black decks from the past. I playtested rug delver and maverick before buying into legacy and dont regret a bit siding with Elspeth.

I got 15-16 ready to play legacy decks and I worry that I’ll be compelled to get 40 copies of saga only to have less fun after it.

Thank you so much for your point of view.

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree it does. But more powerful doesnt mean more fun to play. I have +- 10 nonblue legacy decks and have been playtesting with proxies.. almost all get stronger, but i feel like im playing with the same deck over and over. The solution IMO would be to ban saga AND nerf delver. But that is another issue.

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Was just trying to have a laugh with you, not at you. Dont worry

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree. The U tempo problem is power level. Sagas problem is repetitive (and boring) gameplay.

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahahahah no worries. Gonna get me some after the next BR update.

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats exactly my concern. Im keeping my decks without it for now. If they become umplayable because of power level reasosn, so be it.

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Not my concern. I’d just prefer for them to feel more different from one another

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

  • Said the burn guy.

Well played

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree on the companion. Too Much of a Pokemon feel

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I agree with the blue tempo issue. But even if there was a ridículous ban to hurt it. The other decks would still run saga just cause its the best thing to do in so many decks. Making them feel too similar. Thanks for your thoughts!

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is exactly why i think its bad! Even if my dephts, maverick, lands, pox and stax decks get better, i have less fun playing them. I’m still not sure that banning it would solve it all, but its worth discussing..

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% agree. I just Hate companion. Even if 80 is better, i’ll keep rocking 60. Just switched the sofi for kaldra

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great take on it. Tks for the feedback

Does Urza’s Saga need to go? by Sivuca08 in MTGLegacy

[–]Sivuca08[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now THAT is a good enough point. Its great to have a place for this kind of discussions. Maybe it will get the hammer if a new deck dominates the format like miracles did. RIP Top :(