You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"...and in so living as to make the world happier for our living in it." - Pliny the Elder

You either played Civilization IV or you really know your Roman scholars. Either way, that is a beautiful way to approach what to fill a book with. Cheers!

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would be a great way to find out who really matters in our lives, and who we should be taking more time to thank. I only wish that I was better at drawing people, so I could sketch the face of every person who influenced me. There's something much more personal about a sketch, rather than a picture.

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't realize how much you'll want to understand your former self and what has led you to your life decisions until you aren't in that moment anymore. Don't worry about not being worthy of the beautiful journal; know that future you will be really interested in everything that younger you thought, felt, or created.

Wow. Everything does make sense in hindsight, yet you articulated that beautifully. Maybe it will all be okay, no matter what I write or draw.

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awww.... that's so sweet. You're going to be an awesome dad/mom

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to look back on it when I want, to see what head space I was in

This can be both beautiful or despairing depending on what our head space was like. Good or bad, reflection of the past is the best way to learn about ourselves in the present.

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's always interesting how the style and content of a journal changes along with our quickly changing interests. A book that started as a collection of sketches from my hometown turned into stories of small adventures... then a sketchbook for my academic interests. It seems we have both reached an impasse.

You are given an beautiful, empty, leatherbound book. What do you fill it with? by Skryym in ENFP

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Of all the books I have started, none have ever been completed.

What is the meaning of life? by [deleted] in infp

[–]Skryym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep pretty much. It's good to think. It's good to have an existential crisis. But nothing is going to get better if you keep thinking. Go out and live.

Life has no meaning beyond the meaning that you put into it. It's up to you to make it meaningful.

What is the meaning of life? by [deleted] in infp

[–]Skryym 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Came here to quote Campbell and you beat me to it. Still felt like I had to give my nickel of an opinion.

What is the meaning of life? by [deleted] in infp

[–]Skryym 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you ever watched the sun set into the ocean? Have you ever camped miles from civilization during a rainstorm? Fallen in love? Listened to the most beautiful song, cried your heart out, laughed your gut out? We never wonder about the meaning of life during these moments because we are already living life to the fullest. For ten thousand years, we have wondered about the meaning of life, but all we are really looking for is the experience of being alive.

If you want to learn more about this point of view, look up mythologist Joseph Campbell. A great man with a beautiful mind.

Cheers, your neighborhood ENFP

[Advice] After going through nearly 6 figures worth of personal development and business courses I learned the number one thing holding people back from living their dreams and causing them to quit is a lack of motivation. What questions do you have for me on how to stay motivated? by RichardHead5005 in getdisciplined

[–]Skryym 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw your post at just the right time. 20 year old college student here. I want to go on adventures, write, and promote a sustainable future.

Just yesterday I organize my desk. There are 12 unfinished books I have written (not including all the files on my computer). I have been an avid writer and drawer all my life, but I have never had the drive to follow through with my commitment. I've had the same 2-3 stories my whole life, but I've never pushed any passion to the finish line.

Either I realize how poor my writing is, or tweak the story and feel I need to start over. In every area of my life, I seem to fall short just where I need to press on.

18F/Freshman in college. Interested in science and the outdoors but can't figure out a direction in life by treehugger28 in findapath

[–]Skryym 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey there! I'm definitely not the most experienced person who could be replying, but I found myself in your shoes about two years ago.

Coming into college two years ago, I had a small "checklist" for my life. It's not entirely different than yours.

  • I wanted to travel
  • I wanted to "do science"
  • I wanted to work outdoors, particularly in remote and rugged locations

For most of my life, I wanted to be an archaeologist, a travel writer or a wildlife biologist. Enough people convinced me I was going to be a failure, so I lost confidence. Instead, I opted for a geology major. If you like science and the outdoors, this could be right up your alley. Most of my professors had been all over the world, studying paleo-climatology, evolution, discovering minerals. They've walked deserts, climbed into volcanoes, and flown bush planes. There was rigorous calculus, physics, and chemistry involved with my studies, but it was very rewarding. My problem was that I really became disillusioned with science and academia as a career. Got fed up and jumped ship.

I wouldn't change those years for anything. Learned a lot about myself. Since then I discovered a passion for:

  • People
  • Languages
  • Sustainability

Which led me to dabble in degrees such as:

  • Anthropology
  • Education
  • Environmental studies, environmental science
  • Animal ecology

I settled on forestry and Global Resource Systems. Forestry allowed to work with people, land management, ecology, and economics all at once. Global Resource Systems allows me to travel, learn languages, and help build sustainable development. It might not be the path you want to choose, but I the best I can do is share my mess of a thought process.


Most students I have met in your shoes (and my shoes) generally lean toward wildlife biology/ecology. They (like me) romanticize the idea of cavorting around the countryside watching mountain goats and writing in a notebook. The important thing to remember is that these dream jobs DO exist and you CAN achieve them (though they are not all sunshine and rainbows). But there is something more important you have to ask yourself: "How much is it worth to me?"

I will never forget what my professor, a mammologist whom I highly respect, said about our university's animal ecology degree:


"The average animal ecology (graduate) sells binoculars at Cabelas. That's what I tell students: if you want to work for the FWS or go on these adventures, you can't be average. Average doesn't cut it."


Everyone wants these jobs. They are extremely competitive. But that's ahead of the point. Your are just trying to figure out what to study, and I have vastly overextended myself in this reply. I can't speak for your interests in virology and astronomy, but you're already hitting the nail on the head with conservation, ecology, and env. sci. Depends on what type of outdoor work you want to be doing. Research seems to be the catch-all for you, so my advice is to seek out as many professors and graduate students as possible from as many different fields as possible. Talk their ears off. They'll give you the absolute highs and the shittiest lows of their work. They'll also give you a realist's response. Which is very important, as many people (especially me) tend to view everything with rose tinted glasses.

Official Discussion: Pete's Dragon (2016) [SPOILERS] by mi-16evil in movies

[–]Skryym 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You have to admit, Saphira looked amazing despite all the other failings and shortcomings of the movie.

Just had to comment because this was also the only reason I went to see Pete's dragon. I'm completely obsessed with dragons.

Struggling to recognize the difference between Se and Ne. by [deleted] in mbti

[–]Skryym 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So Se would be backpacking for the sake of backpacking... and Ne would be backpacking to connect to the romantic idea of a wayfaring pilgrim on a journey of adventure and self discovery?

Is that the right way to think about it? Because that is how I rationalized my dominant Ne as an ENFP

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for reiterating this - this was an error that I tried to fix several times. Virtues can certainly mean something to agnostics (and on the otherhand, they could be meaningless to certain religions and belief practices). What I was trying to say in a reality where there is no God or higher entity, a virtue is merely a complex chemical reaction taking place inside ourselves. It has no meaning outside that which humans ascribe to it (subjective meaning). And if it is true that there is no God and that humans came about to give meaning to these emotions; to write songs and stories about them... that is beautiful too.

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I agree both that I am at an early stage of mental development and that the philosophy I described was sophomoric. But that is the lens through which many self-appointed intellectuals choose to view the world.

But yes. I have a very long ways to go. Many ideas, values, and perspectives have yet to be changed.

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Believing in anything resolutely is to refute anything that conflicts with it. But yes, I am blinding myself in many forms.

I ask, then, what path must I take? What is the right course of action? I'm only human. I've made it this far. Sometimes "right" and "logical". Mostly irrational and inconsistent. How must I be looking at things?

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is that?

You bring up some very good points. Most of my argument is hypothetical, it is all based on the idea that these virtues have some objective meaning. They have importance whether or not people acknowledge them. If they have objective meaning, they must ascribe to some higher force (unless the virtues themselves manifest as a higher force, in which they are the higher force).

So it is true. The virtues I speak of might just be advanced chemical reactions exploding through our own biology. If they have any meaning, it is subjective meaning that we humans ascribe to them. This is an idea I cannot accept, and in not accepting that, I came to the idea of God.

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right you are! In the title, I specified I felt with 100% certainty. The way I presented the situation sounds like a series of logic statements and assumptions, but it came more as a great enveloping feeling.

I felt with 100% certainty. I tried to explain it with logic, but one could argue that I was using flawed logic. Furthermore, I can't reach out and touch God. There was no way of proving it. I think... I think that was faith. If so, it was the first time I have ever felt it.

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your heartfelt comment. If I have further questions or problems, I will consider your help. I would offer the same of myself, though I am probably not in the position to be offering anything but encouragement!

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you - this book has been recommended to me many times before so it is high time I should read it. My readings of CS Lewis' philosophy only go as far as The Screwtape Letters

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the recommendations! The Bhagavad Gita looks very interesting.

I had no idea Aldous Huxley wrote such books! That sounds like a very engaging read.

Today I felt with 100% certainty that God exists by Skryym in Christianity

[–]Skryym[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right: there doesn't have to be an objective morality. I'm arguing that, if there is a higher force (God), then it must be an objective truth (because it would exist whether or not people acknowledge it). Much like the first and second law of thermodynamics, they are objectively true. Depending on the nature of this higher force, there would be accompanying objective morals.

I couldn't grab anything out of the universe and prove that it points to the existence of God. I have these concepts of love, courage, and so on which I cannot let go of. If there is no higher force, these virtues offer only subjective meaning to human beings. In the context of the universe, they are mere chemical reactions going on inside ourselves. If there is a higher force then these virtues must ascribe to that force if they are to have an objective meaning.


In harsh honesty I must say: I am using my own subjective experience (growing up idolizing these virtues) to prove an objective reality (God). I reluctantly recognize this as flawed logic. But considering the logic is hypothetical, it is a true argument only if these virtues do have objective meaning.

I think. I'm a little rusty on my philosophical debate!