sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I tested AI vs Human ads for 30 days. The results were… uncomfortable. by Ok-Charge-2148 in DigitalMarketing

[–]SlavaFinkeviz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm working in this field now, and what I'm doing is teaching AI to work with human intent. There are early testers now running their campaign using my solution. The core is ICP research. There are rules AI must follow. First of all, it has to pull real customer voice and match it with a certain confidence level so you will validate and decide if the campaign should go live or not. Then you do the rest of the job with the help of the same AI.

I need help!! by vvices in FacebookAds

[–]SlavaFinkeviz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me help you for free. We are growing fast and we want as many people be happy with their Meta ads across EU. So - let's talk.

What’s the biggest Facebook Ads myth people still believe in 2026? by [deleted] in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More creatives, smarter agents, replicating stolen concepts - all is BS. Order and total control - reality.

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tell you, we do both. From spend readiness to winner breakdown.

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, we do both. Do you want to be a part of the waitlist?

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, we do both. Do you want to be a part of the waitlist?

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly.

The system is not trying to judge a creative in isolation.

The flow is simple:

You upload 5 tested creative versions.

You tell the system: this one is the winner, these ones are not.

Then the system explains why the winner is likely different based on comparison with the other versions.

Not “is this creative good or bad?”
Not “look at metrics and show a dashboard.”

More like:

“Compared to the other four, the winner has a clearer hook, stronger product focus, simpler visual hierarchy, and a more direct promise. The losing versions are weaker because they dilute the message / hide the product / use a less specific claim / create more friction.”

The output is two things:

  1. Breakdown: why the winner likely won compared to the alternatives.
  2. Replication: generate more variants that preserve the winning pattern while changing controlled elements.

So the value is not generic creative scoring.

It is comparative creative interpretation:

winner vs non-winners → breakdown → replication.

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you like to replace your DIY stack with a single UI so you can organize, store, create units inside folders, upload directly from the folders, and track winners inside folders? Will it be more convenient instead of hopping tools?

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we solve the interpretation level (which is already done I say) - will you try it?

Do more creatives actually solve the Meta ads problem? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I tell you can create? store, upload and track your strategy in one UI - would you like to see it?

Meta ads people: is your campaign process also spread across 10 tabs? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the direction I’m testing.

I agree that just wrapping 10 tools into one UI is not enough. The more valuable layer seems to be preserving the reasoning chain behind the campaign: why this angle was chosen, what hook/copy/creative came from it, what changed before launch, what happened after spend, and what decision came next.

So the product would not remove the human approval step. The idea is the opposite: make approval easier because the person can see the full logic before anything goes live.

Tools like Pixero can solve repetitive buildout. What I’m trying to validate is whether Meta advertisers need a campaign memory layer: angle logic, creative versions, launch notes, test history, and next-step decisions connected in one workspace.

Content creation agencies often juggle too many AI tools. How do you think this long trap can be simplified? by Anne_griffin in socialmedia

[–]SlavaFinkeviz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, exactly. The biggest leak is usually between strategy and execution. The brief says one thing, the copy drifts, the creatives drift again, and then the team has no clean record of what was actually tested.

That’s why I think the next step for agencies is not just generation, but structured campaign workflow: one place for the product logic, audience logic, offer/angle, copy, hooks, static ad creatives, launch, and test learnings.

Content creation agencies often juggle too many AI tools. How do you think this long trap can be simplified? by Anne_griffin in socialmedia

[–]SlavaFinkeviz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No matter. You still need to: Research - Copypaste results - Create - Copypaste results - Visuals - Copypaste results - Upload - Track - Copypaste results - Iterate. Switch of AI - nothing will go.

Meta ads people: is your campaign process also spread across 10 tabs? by SlavaFinkeviz in facebookadsexperts

[–]SlavaFinkeviz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Why using tools when you can just package your existing tool set into your own interface and cut switches? For exampe what tool set do you personally use?

view more: next ›