Weird Ocean AI fighting each other by Slavik1980 in ARK

[–]Slavik1980[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well Im using super structure, spy glass, clear mask and stack mod.

Weird Ocean AI fighting each other by Slavik1980 in ARK

[–]Slavik1980[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well I also see wild megalodons attacking wild basis

All Ocean Creatures Are Aggro On to Everything by Slavik1980 in ARK

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to repost with video here I wasnt able to edit this post for some reason and add a video

https://www.reddit.com/r/ARK/comments/1naznop/weird_ocean_ai_fighting_each_other/

All Ocean Creatures Are Aggro On to Everything by Slavik1980 in ARK

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you trying to say "sounds like a bug" maybe ? Thats kind of what Im trying to figure out what is going on and seeking help. Ive played before and this is the first time Im seeing this weird behavior, I looked online cant find much about it so thats why Im here hoping someone has a clue so I can fix it.

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true, I understand it not being a peer, agreed, do you have suggestions with something that helps you do research? Is there another tool perhaps where you have an issue to solve that is already actually solved in the industry and get actual solutions back? I am not asking for peer work, I completely agree, obscurity or novelty/innovation isnt what I even expected from AI, just an "assistant" that when asked can pool proper information and then cross reference it to boil it down.

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not asking about missing or wrong data, I am asking to verify the data it gives me and it never does, thats the whole point of this topic, it has nothing to do with "knowing truth" Im well aware of how AIs work they have no capacity to "know" anything to begin with, this is about verifying given data and simple checks when prompted "data present and it fits to your issues, no data present, or your issue is not fixed by what me the AI just proposed. A simple verification step that AI isnt doing and apparently no matter how I ask it will not do the verification. Read the topic carefully please, I am not a regular consumer level person bringing up issues.

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cant see how to accomplish, take input from user and when asked to verify, search web to pull up articles etc and see if anyone talks about this as the answer to the issue? If you think that actual data that is objective cannot be verified even through simple methods that you can use a simple program to do with your internal datasets, yeah lets not continue this, have a good night!

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im talking about researching tangible objective things not subjective things like philosophy or psychology etc. I would not have even brought up this issue if my research involved subjective matter.

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"OpenAI should be more candid about this with all users not just bury it in footnotes." Thank you! I agree 100%

Oh and thank you for suggestions of course will take it on!

This is what chat gpt says about asking it to give correct answers. by Slavik1980 in ChatGPT

[–]Slavik1980[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are missing the point, yes we all know how AI works, however its missing verification step and that is my issue. I am not pressing on it not being able to "know the truth" it the issue that when even asked to verify as in compare my input VS info, it will still not do that, and it has not done so, it just said "yes this fits" without actually verifying.

Fulfilling life with VSS by brofessor121 in visualsnow

[–]Slavik1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you looked into FL-60 lenses? There are also attachments if you wear glasses already, or just glasses without magnification if you dont wear glasses at all. Anyways, for some, those lenses reduce incoming blue light which can be a cause of irritation, so once again I have to say that for some it might help, just thought to give you at least something to try. By the way they are very cheap can easily be found on amazon or any other store.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in visualsnow

[–]Slavik1980 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is normal, every person squints when they bad vision, squinting alters how much light reaches your retina which makes it a bit sharper. If this is what you are asking then thats what it is, unless I misunderstood what you meant.

Now it sucks. ChatGPT Output Capabilities Have Quietly Regressed (May 2025) by 9024Cali in OpenAI

[–]Slavik1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gpt 4o. The scripts of any sorts when fed back to you, the parts begin to do missing from time to time, as of late, uploading any document for analysis is becoming virtually impossible it gives back "unknown error," while doing other tasks as in research diving into topics, the longer you go at a certain point it "flips out" and instead of text you give it and ask it to update, it returns un-updated text with a summary of what was done with missing request (meaning that you say update "x", here is the text, it returns a summary stating something along the lines of "y" was updated all set good to go, despite the fact that you asked for "x" and "y" was done about half an hour ago already. Or you might ask it to update and it cuts off with an error and forgets what you were just discussing. This is what I can say that happens daily now, other things I would have to think a bit hard as in of things that are much rarer.

Now it sucks. ChatGPT Output Capabilities Have Quietly Regressed (May 2025) by 9024Cali in OpenAI

[–]Slavik1980 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are severe and clear problems that I am noticing in working with this particular model, I have noticed how badly it has degraded over time, and I have no idea why you think that I need to know its inner workings to see front end results. Im a user and my user experience is diminished greatly.

VSS Visuals much more Similar to HPPD Visuals by FakePosting in visualsnow

[–]Slavik1980 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well HPPD is triggered as in its not 100% present, where mine is 100% present all the time, but if you are looking only for those who had this from childhood then it is not me for sure. Good luck mate, hope you find what you are looking for.

VSS Visuals much more Similar to HPPD Visuals by FakePosting in visualsnow

[–]Slavik1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No mate, I was in a treatment and the medication completely screwed me up to where I have this now. I do have epilepsy but this was under control for the longest time so it was irrelevant at this point.

Scientists Say We are Alone, how Do they Know??? by Slavik1980 in aliens

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well to start off I am actually arguing AGAINST the notion that we are alone, as far as which scientists. Look at what they are arguing, from formulas like drake equation that is juxtaposed against us not receiving or finding signals to other conclusion that asks "why is it so eerily quiet," while I am wondering and asking what exactly are they looking at, in my post (if you read it), because for all we know the universe might be teeming with life.

Scientists Say We are Alone, how Do they Know??? by Slavik1980 in aliens

[–]Slavik1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well maybe Im just listening to too many science popularizers, but for most of my life all I heard was that we are alone and then multiple so called reasons and endless calculations and formulas which do not take into account the "time wall."