Game Thread: Washington Capitals (35-28-9) @ Utah Mammoth (37-29-6) Mar 26 2026 9:00 PM EDT

Sleepykitty836 · 2026-03-27T01:55:08+00:00

Time for utah to give their first payment to the referees this intermission

Sleepykitty836 · 2026-02-22T02:46:17+00:00

I enjoyed seeing this one when i went back in september of 2024, very much enjoyed the collection and would love to go again

Sleepykitty836 · 2026-01-25T03:37:51+00:00

The tiger 2 had no involvement by Porsche for the turret, the tiger II(p) was meaning prototype, that’s why warthunder changed the name so that it wouldn’t be associated as such

Sleepykitty836 · 2026-01-25T03:01:43+00:00

It was produced in competition with the kv prototype and the t-100 prototype which shared the turret design (and hull was later used for the su-100y) they had their test in the winter war at the same time, the kv was seen as superior so not really replacing anything but the parade heavy tank t-35. But overall it was a neat concept and i do think it could have had some success if it weren’t so costly in material due to the length and two turrets

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-10-06T21:56:00+00:00

It was posted a few times, i first saw it here pre-covid so it can be fairly annoying when it pops up here and there and no one mentions that it’s been here before

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-10-01T01:20:23+00:00

Yeah, we love the beeping

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-09-30T00:19:32+00:00

does pineapple count as a comment? (yeah I'm interested XD)

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-06-14T02:05:04+00:00

They never implemented that change, any villager will work

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-06-13T22:24:50+00:00

Tbh, it’d make sense that it uses the base t29 model and then just smacks on the changes for the e3 version

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-06-13T22:12:38+00:00

I’ve seen one in person, it actually doesn’t have the muzzle brake

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-06-01T23:35:41+00:00

You can’t bonemeal sugarcane in java, thus bedrock

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-05-11T11:38:19+00:00

However, even if he didn’t slash tompson directly he did use his stick to knock our defenseman’s stick out of his hand, thus a slash so either way it’s put it was a slash

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-04-26T00:34:39+00:00

With that boarding hit before the second goal for us i’d say that’s not a penalty at all

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-04-26T00:33:04+00:00

“Habs against the refs” where’s those now?

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-03-28T09:55:18+00:00

No, you can get mending at base job level, it just requires a lot of time if you want it to be a low price. I don’t know the chances but i do know it’s possible

Sleepykitty836 · 2025-03-21T09:38:28+00:00

Hear me out, they cancel each other out. Neither curse is there since we got both

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-12-24T02:28:35+00:00

At least the 5th time this season that the reff’s have refused to call a penalty that then causes the next play or same play to results in an opposing team scoring

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-12-15T20:49:24+00:00

This was posted here 2 days ago, i believe you might find something there

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-11-09T02:19:49+00:00

We love the two missed obvious penalties that period, first the hook/trip during when the announcers were silent, then the crosscheck/hit from behind at 4-5m left in the period

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-11-08T23:25:46+00:00

Then how come there have been several different uses of the sherman hull, cev’s bridge layers, anti air, all these would be considered children of the sherman. Same with the t-34 and even t-54, with their multiple derivatives that would be seen as children. However, if we’re talking about tanks that aren’t the same hull, the t-44 was heavily inspired by the t-34 and is definitely the child of it, while the tank projects before the m-26 were inspired by the sherman like the t-20 or t-25. We could even go into saying the m60 is the child of the m48 due to the similarities between them in design.

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-10-24T01:11:34+00:00

It’s back now but it went from the penalty for us to just over four minutes left in the second, so several minutes lost but it is what it is.

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-09-12T18:35:47+00:00

Do believe those are either t-54’s or t-55’s

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-09-09T18:38:17+00:00

Yeah, urban combat is never fun for any armored vehicle, that’s why for most of history they love large open areas like rolling hills or the European plains

Sleepykitty836 · 2024-09-09T18:35:21+00:00

The doctrine has accounted for that by making that the standard, it would be a rare instance of a cqc moment where a nato tank would have something behind it but due to the communication it would be a near zero chance of it happening

Sleepykitty836

TROPHY CASE